From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Towards a cleaner build Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 07:22:12 -0400 Message-ID: References: <831s0xd3z1.fsf@gnu.org> <83pnohbhny.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="124684"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier , Emacs developers To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 28 13:40:15 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hVaSj-000W0S-8s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 May 2019 13:40:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32812 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hVaBq-0005GE-UY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 May 2019 07:22:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38984) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hVaBi-0005G8-R4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 May 2019 07:22:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hVaBg-0002CP-VO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 May 2019 07:22:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi1-x232.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::232]:34970) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hVaBa-0002Ac-49; Tue, 28 May 2019 07:22:31 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi1-x232.google.com with SMTP id a132so13955392oib.2; Tue, 28 May 2019 04:22:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=y8RkTOqFAfVGkozjV5jXFpGCblvbcHk6mZtGdUy9j+M=; b=ltWpRNIL9fjqOxgP33p9VYYhjy6Uv/lz+FxbQdJu2P7osJDOJjCEKUkLywyZvTl7A7 YeVqY8fMAv32oBnoo90eyPZp4jbSDezcaZ74BHjNzpn752cIMovoQ6g2kXD+hrbmPsNl pwgLKOp+dXgcBvQZ7pDrJqWi+JTV4b4OJWdC4IwrTRsLSgdDAHpXgvd6Qb6+0ceiGHxn JPsnLuxNBKk+yTZCaaTeufANkKlOzpi+24UkieNoiwFbQkqESC7DIDQwq2CN8VTEvUj1 K40Wh77/Vg1wEDHlVgh4YLItZzG6hB88GYftJmLBTMF5LJdwS/12q5QRLxRkYzHyqXt2 FrVw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=y8RkTOqFAfVGkozjV5jXFpGCblvbcHk6mZtGdUy9j+M=; b=D9KcwVaFw1HQrQuGmmh+zAan/xFJemc7xX08s0W/MxmhD55DQA3PX4REjm7zIULCZ6 mynRMP+M4ZvOY19HW6Onr09vuPD4+/k3kGvCp54PnP7V9evFg2VEmCjmP7M2rlSn/TFM D5MEnQ1f2ML1V6yze/GpwjlhpEwkL84gRkmJe4XaqRhHAXI6ZjSlVO/6n94hB86mXFDt l9iTgmoBCDI9n8na1rlBek8mkFX5OxueGtrLVSYzL0KHragOQGtMB2/R0WwjjE4VlAA8 T6ZPuFmyUkohvjTsPGvEB0lLv2a/juQr7z0lktb4h6NkfqoFXr1LJqxoXsBSSZQ5z2XC Y/gw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXJK7LGKgexoEkvR8LPX0siOeCarQ6flbW0Nbm4u3nFcSnPw/gD ypjmcNaPx/PZxX+L5byJtid9nWPpT/slpMZoo8k= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwR6UcqVo2q0WnfMpigonOm5RAH8HE33/O/ZjQlhY5b/+3pkwJT0BDWOM0xr2ClS0mMEbIYt2jV7mh/2QVahcA= X-Received: by 2002:aca:4d0c:: with SMTP id a12mr2346897oib.23.1559042548979; Tue, 28 May 2019 04:22:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::232 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:237085 Archived-At: On Tue, 28 May 2019 at 05:49, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > > Noam Postavsky writes: > > > I think this could have the unwanted side-effect of "polluting" the > > Emacs session which runs the compiler with the obsolete function info > > from the files it's compiling. > > That's true, but does it matter? Not sure, but after spending time on preventing defsetf from defining things in the compiler's Emacs session[1], I would feel bad about letting this one through ;) [1]: https://debbugs.gnu.org/27016 > (defun foo () > (with-suppressed-warnings (obsolete foo) > ...)) > > That seems like a rather drastic way of doing it, I think? Why do you say that?