From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5923: 23.1.95; minibuffer-message discards input events Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 09:11:57 -0400 Message-ID: References: <6ED90800C89F408BB0C3F86660BB4C10@us.oracle.com> <7C90907943E64115BA7CFABFB144BD24@us.oracle.com> <497D764814894831A571BD283D21B9DA@us.oracle.com> <45AB7455D0FD4FCC9ED735A11D8CCEF0@us.oracle.com> <0CFCF01B9DFA4AEF9648A708DF097A91@us.oracle.com> <87shvod8zn.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1467810803 31076 80.91.229.3 (6 Jul 2016 13:13:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 13:13:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 5923@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 06 15:13:14 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bKmdd-0003p3-23 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2016 15:13:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33511 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bKmdc-00042l-7E for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2016 09:13:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47059) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bKmdW-00042b-FI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2016 09:13:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bKmdS-0007mh-Ig for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2016 09:13:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54833) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bKmdS-0007mb-FH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2016 09:13:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bKmdS-00074d-8t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2016 09:13:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 13:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 5923 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 5923-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B5923.146781072627125 (code B ref 5923); Wed, 06 Jul 2016 13:13:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5923) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jul 2016 13:12:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38937 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bKmcX-00073R-NF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2016 09:12:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-f46.google.com ([209.85.218.46]:36863) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bKmcW-00072x-2A for 5923@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2016 09:12:04 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-f46.google.com with SMTP id f189so269804264oig.3 for <5923@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 06 Jul 2016 06:12:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=Y0jOCiPVXLWNstdceLeC4o38TmHt3yhFLdvimfMdIGY=; b=CqwH+wbbbaoEskWHW8BEmJ/lrb4J1Ci1VWam0s7ZAfFrhbkq1s9NAtpkq4Dcb/F9Ee /EhRYocJHn+fx31vnNbMtof1HVKy94PoQboEjodlE/Jmy3kgCH4KkWX+BJpxFEJRzTNh f8i8Cug/CUEBsmCNfZp/K/0cBbDIknZzEOfgcy8VRkkAsuCRgXbI36Fd+rJpuSWVh34d R+EmM8wbzEMEOr5460Qye9Y/Wp+WZxNiff6UAEQAyYKklo7PxvA+pR5RXDg7+W45mfVr bGoOSlztMPAtrn/TEbo/ppPHHNLvn48/0PJjY0RmDsd5qXWk80qd74R27NUaNxKas+oI zDgQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Y0jOCiPVXLWNstdceLeC4o38TmHt3yhFLdvimfMdIGY=; b=feYaeNaHrhD+FqXZb/7SWCJjJb7+FbsdT8fFox4vxM4MRPvLYLHT1F4L/6nZzdSRrI CIc48qnFCMLYK1krqI5w4vDgN6z1sNvw4qx+WJgwLALLhgni/sddpE4MvKny6YrRfHzM WzQ2nrvST+YSss45xPQyvpcK5BR1tXHQMk7jO/KTaupXhmRgMwZCxb/j3d7wDWboaR/H mPP/HXCIJFOZJt9WiMFzst83v3gwkxVQsHsgLGOf+o+HiQldIsx9iGakVJOOsL41YDO4 taYnaIv34DH2XQFFhUE/nI959qGFvWjyMzkBEmhKPy3XkDef4NPvwYfz3yxrjmSkHmRM 9/hg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKE1vvcsfh+KXTjZJj7whlCYgDKu2Umb8NPnbY0krP2wLmHzqXv1O48c0xooogGBF3y3V6iba7AnwwGDA== X-Received: by 10.157.38.246 with SMTP id i51mr4313180otd.112.1467810718462; Wed, 06 Jul 2016 06:11:58 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.157.4.197 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 06:11:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0ZdNIKV_ID-2QpmWLltzZ1-KVbY X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:120484 Archived-At: On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Drew Adams wrote: > I don't know if it is fixed, and I don't have the time to dig into > this again. (What you quoted was by no means the last part of this > bug thread, BTW.) I would _not_ assume that this bug has been fixed. > I think someone would need to dig into this, to debug it. > > I provided a self-contained repro recipe based on the code at > the time, but it is no longer sufficient because variable > `overriding-map-is-bound' no longer exists, and the underlying > code has changed. It looks like the examples are reductions from icicles code. Do you still have problems with this in icicles? A repro recipe along the lines of "load icicles-foo.el and icicles-bar.el then M-x C-u ..." would be useful. Otherwise I would propose to close the bug as unreproducible. PS Removing bug #3938 from cc list, as it seems to cause duplicated emails (I hadn't noticed that I had sent my previous message to both merged bugs, seems to be a misfeature of gnus' ephemeral bug groups)