From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: pcase: Semantics of atom QPATS Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2018 09:42:40 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87tvqbjwyf.fsf@web.de> <87k1r3qro3.fsf@web.de> <87vaaj9y4b.fsf@web.de> <83d0wr1ami.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhzvtced.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1529156447 15579 195.159.176.226 (16 Jun 2018 13:40:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2018 13:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier , Emacs developers To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 16 15:40:43 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fUBRY-0003rl-7x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2018 15:40:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51616 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fUBTf-0003Zz-6J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2018 09:42:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48902) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fUBTY-0003Zi-Tt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2018 09:42:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fUBTY-0007x8-Aa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2018 09:42:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ot0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::235]:43381) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fUBTX-0007vE-4y; Sat, 16 Jun 2018 09:42:43 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ot0-x235.google.com with SMTP id i19-v6so13956904otk.10; Sat, 16 Jun 2018 06:42:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=z7XYq2Ls1Y27yuh4AwxxCA1Qyru4VI5Y55iMJ+RPWh4=; b=YmuEsKqLJOOWzFJqaoRR7GQ2qx7i57O21KKzt4pf8s18OIBIe/53CTz+pYOFcyWMbM dux46GiVKbX7HHBELX4N/1zWuVUKwIJ13vSlHyO/UKkyjeBXKQmmUojlbCwupdeq7vQF YddFdJF1uoHRvTLPhVAQBL+HTbiz8RYAW7KsOxjhXqJnMvBT0wXtKeWwNEOBy/ec3v1i RYK8tvfsgCY9FshiR8hByAq97x21s2kTL/+6jOQsKXcXKbqotAAyRp9hhx+D2MYgQgx1 Fedzb+/uFaX8nAVTD+SybmRt5bC2XRyT2XtQumHyX6Z0zDk4B4GfC9k4yJphwY+wS/qv dwLA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=z7XYq2Ls1Y27yuh4AwxxCA1Qyru4VI5Y55iMJ+RPWh4=; b=Ccf9MWvi88G9lFirPIJCEVovJnH3oDaqFxj4wm9bI08MkOdQZoFw1UytccmBJSYKk/ JbwysrmY6bZ3tlTjiFHbTJ/uoRcV48+Px6iopBgHnYBg+s163xqgbWKkqm86mjpDe6Ln ahY9T1KLO28sq0H3nlQ+7H+UiTRJ7GovzwCrT0qb9IZjMsiDxeh+EZL7RPb7ExsjYuZl wZsR/JpedKyU16nX+vK0SNA/EwA3fAKGPtp4FECog4roIQUpf8tBPL0njqlpZdV/+W+Z 2AphXZF0qGKFKVtgRGU26s0ihbFiyqtZlbP4ZmxlDYkN6aHlJRjZesEO5tscNVyXzzqQ wSKA== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E1aV+aYKrBuqnWeOVQlfLIB+4hlwGcR7Pe0ddtZGwFokWYaqxD/ uT1hWMpuPz53t65WZjwUh3JyvrUHvY0rvkv9wk4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKJR5ck2/qAq7737gy2Asc7YvE1ET+4+FlE/ZrLPui+xwRnH/HWVceGSG9FrafI6ppTVtTbJytaIqvydQXIWH7w= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:577d:: with SMTP id x58-v6mr3743009oti.196.1529156561032; Sat, 16 Jun 2018 06:42:41 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 2002:a4a:3b84:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Jun 2018 06:42:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87zhzvtced.fsf@web.de> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::235 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:226359 Archived-At: On 16 June 2018 at 03:32, Michael Heerdegen wrote: >> > - ((or (stringp qpat) (integerp qpat) (symbolp qpat)) `',qpat) >> > + ((or (stringp qpat) (numberp qpat) (symbolp qpat)) `',qpat) >> >> Any reasons to use numberp and not number-or-marker-p? > > Is it likely that someone constructs a pcase pattern with a literal > marker in it? Note this is about the pattern, not about the matched > value. It would be pretty difficult to do that since markers don't have a read syntax. It's possible using a macro which expands to a pcase form, if you can handle the nested backquotes...