From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5989: 23.1.96; bug 4209 not completely fixed (regression in re-search-forward) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2016 12:51:07 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4BCDF029.9040106@cjmweb.net> <83eg8dudzd.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1465059148 15817 80.91.229.3 (4 Jun 2016 16:52:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2016 16:52:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cjm@cjmweb.net To: 5989@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 04 18:52:17 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b9Eo3-0001Nm-6B for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2016 18:52:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33421 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9Eo2-0006BW-7A for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2016 12:52:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39956) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9Ent-000685-K0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2016 12:52:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9Enq-0007uy-IJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2016 12:52:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42232) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9Enq-0007us-F4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2016 12:52:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b9Enq-0001AR-9g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2016 12:52:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2016 16:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 5989 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 5989-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B5989.14650590774426 (code B ref 5989); Sat, 04 Jun 2016 16:52:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5989) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jun 2016 16:51:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54567 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b9En6-00019J-Rz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2016 12:51:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-f44.google.com ([209.85.218.44]:36110) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b9En3-00018y-Uo for 5989@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2016 12:51:14 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-f44.google.com with SMTP id j1so170515813oih.3 for <5989@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 04 Jun 2016 09:51:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=ep2HaJ4LjZkLOpOd1Cup1ITajHiNcM1EfORs35x4/XA=; b=YoR9CVnT8pU204kKnM3Zf/Tj5jXyXjW83/yUio6aPDN60z3NwiY0usj18VGDGHPEpj dd44ASe57BEcCO+iVwY4PN6YnBVsk2nhDqA1REi/Jw1IeqrWe07X6VtyvnfWAB8OFojR E8y74eZhAlY9kTPpP42cRNkfX8jZ9qW5fYa/DROhv1jV8GRkG02NmQx4UDzwAAPEYKJa OLs7dR3smfQcLp10theiDJ/a9WiNaCXxpTyOpAmEAgeZzqMKObX5NJvI1uYOfJlNdgdg 3hkXduXucmICzdnbPxLGNMTSSbQMldyJnqVZyqB6UkWeQipYXohBOpig7gAgQfTzo8Ne +8Rg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ep2HaJ4LjZkLOpOd1Cup1ITajHiNcM1EfORs35x4/XA=; b=JM35rtPfxrcabQfeAOnQD4sPG5UdnrgeyPc03Vzqhlz0GKt8jf/06UqBCEUhOWFcNq 9YmBY6jf7Jla0wZQY7WPPotNZTYrk4HYz1cOHWGqAiHs+4c5V28MNF/XQSBeDsVuBn1B hthbu/otIuN7OU0WihnDAlhqg1sMQmnsc4sH/X8d5S6O1dz7cNvh9EJWvdCV7h1hgrti HfMU88wf8Iyv5J7X/gJHeYACYA9T7tQbBv/IGyY7kmsRR7FVOPPj5lMEJ2RdpBibkGZJ 2gJ1uJPM6JrKgPMl/5mJk3Cmvesgy6sivgywV53YVWdT0Wg4CQMz6CjbRPagoU95wJYg 0kGA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLFMv8NbM8bPzwwaMdntoHWbpWeYi0Z6umVuPEozw89rInJRVWLqoCM2wfLZoGOQXdoJozHvAjSW5KWsw== X-Received: by 10.157.29.10 with SMTP id m10mr5197499otm.196.1465059068342; Sat, 04 Jun 2016 09:51:08 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.157.5.168 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Jun 2016 09:51:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83eg8dudzd.fsf@gnu.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: z6U9Z5ca8gjC7xmPhvSBnnOCbEw X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:119067 Archived-At: tag 5989 + notabug quit On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > If you don't make the buffer unibyte, everything works as expected. > Using multibyte buffers even for raw bytes is what we recommend. So I > see no problem here that we should work on: unibyte buffers are not > meant to process text. Makes sense. (adding OP back on CC; still getting used to debbugs, so I had dropped them in my previous message)