From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: generator documentation improvement Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:06:28 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1489007198 3981 195.159.176.226 (8 Mar 2017 21:06:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 21:06:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: Paul Pogonyshev Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 08 22:06:33 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1clin3-0000Wa-6a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 22:06:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58452 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1clin9-0001P8-2S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 16:06:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47243) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1clin2-0001P3-C7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 16:06:33 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1clin1-0008UW-1T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 16:06:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22a]:35329) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1clin0-0008To-T5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 16:06:30 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id 62so26856871oih.2 for ; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 13:06:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=/ZGDNYI40dlHPkUkyLJdOC3Xj7yS3YiHiBGZWN3kcEI=; b=X2sjq2dfPsYODecOxT9ybs5wE6JkxawJDxK+nvzIejjvzf/MPKgRwCup5CE0+RvcNP ovp01RIUWb+ttifM3BB3sSgWWk7rsDIL5HMJcfbdIML7LjjKf+fZhKSyNYd7yPf/4orP kTIfuHVq+4TLIFBI19J+FX8cBNH3n/AMvBfHKgj8LSWUaVTV1OJ/Rg5nF6BwQAah+8mH 18a6usPrnoc8QXktkX4+/6vua192qcOpgKxogIywtTPAlznetYw9flfqg9Vx7PAGk0BA HvzI7cSDzFCRUBgGjo7vE818XJT7SMYcRh3QQdaiHzRtCw43yWXLjpff083I5pyMY4S8 +p1w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/ZGDNYI40dlHPkUkyLJdOC3Xj7yS3YiHiBGZWN3kcEI=; b=gPWha33tXwp6Oki03pvprZ8oqKp62hG5QJLTmnVEWYk+tZkhe+y8ypFTflOipwM037 yEWARfAQ+Q3KdGV9AYzfHEN7D0k3HcFtzzM8a8MC+Qe3UTDtv5LhYgtJFvaS98eiv+9K bmN+Vc3lK2ZPp7cZ3+zg0LUEyQSSRypis8pDCd7YH0N+9d7+Ws/fXfZJxSZiePm/0ntK 1mrHtQW+gyoQDJshRy0BVt1jDzSWomHLEHBcy8wonQQfjnVSA5UVCy25GAYA6yqs+LyS axOFerI9EKfgVICANu8EwZyZfLOsu3/4fwJJJaRiWQV+HQRqGGdwFEy2HmUloDfwDg14 dsZQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39l5qzjdeS78r5nH8MUi7Zlb/ZGSDKecuHeI8tVzTv3C0SUnjGKh5luzeSdRsWi8MXs9h/mBd5lU+3qhew== X-Received: by 10.202.244.10 with SMTP id s10mr5295864oih.187.1489007188422; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 13:06:28 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.157.80.172 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 13:06:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: GUa7WrA5caEMiXVFakfrAoN_d74 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22a X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:212848 Archived-At: On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Paul Pogonyshev wrote: > > If you evaluate the last form, you'll see "B" and "C" printed twice > because `let' for dynamic variable is internally implemented with > something similar to `unwind-protect'. However, when documentation > doesn't mention it, that's very hard to pinpoint. Is this Bug#25965 "iter-lambda may evaluate certain forms twice"? https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25965