From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#29165: 26.0.90; can't use some code byte-compiled under emacs 24 Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 14:16:47 -0500 Message-ID: References: <6eh8u7x5be.fsf@just-testing.permabit.com> <87375r7f0g.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <9f1e7a1f-bfc0-43a4-9acb-cf69b85587be@default> <5C8038D7-FF85-4C42-A728-F3F85CDAC85C@permabit.com> <87efpb46sp.fsf@linux-m68k.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1509995837 18924 195.159.176.226 (6 Nov 2017 19:17:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 19:17:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andreas Schwab , Philipp Stephani , 29165@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ken Raeburn Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 06 20:17:07 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eBmtP-0004d5-D3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 20:17:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49923 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eBmtW-0004Vy-IN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 14:17:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55861) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eBmtN-0004Sc-Os for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 14:17:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eBmtK-00070l-Hh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 14:17:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45878) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eBmtK-00070X-Dh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 14:17:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eBmtJ-0002eZ-Vx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 14:17:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 19:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 29165 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 29165-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B29165.150999581510030 (code B ref 29165); Mon, 06 Nov 2017 19:17:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 29165) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2017 19:16:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54559 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eBmtD-0002ba-0w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 14:16:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:52891) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eBmtB-0002WX-DB for 29165@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 14:16:53 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f53.google.com with SMTP id t139so16459214wmt.1 for <29165@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 11:16:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZYiFbs3MepvIs3RKzBNQQmwh/nFwlEXXX/Bvs7xlrgM=; b=V0vR5r2L2oLGdbXmjNqE7xAjEhwmZ2hfU0yskEzFSS/lxrZIThIbwsxwLxXJgYI63e iXkDoCS4ZAmaM6PA+EgmeR5muiaWmq+XyeFDe8qKvQnYvH4Ir9GWL7EI+nt29z9ft+LE qGR4sEzq9h6LirrlRmQadjzC5d8eJkArYiA6d4aRwsYvhH6JjIjoUf8XH8HinO3tjki5 JE+Z7PQcnf8lOGekM//wIbMtQq6qHl/adcAmqX4KADvY2zhHWnr7/vlSycdgGsd6OCgO kXj42jcZrgk3OT+KupGFTDjroIdm24g1eMkgnUqao/mRaEmnMU+K/fOtFASRFBwBuMmO F5Rg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZYiFbs3MepvIs3RKzBNQQmwh/nFwlEXXX/Bvs7xlrgM=; b=WLBdntOWl0WdxVUR6WNU5mF+lU/sIrdrJEZEK4Fyu2j4qWyLPdbWPhwafMoL6PUwL3 mFHW2xYnP48uFoJBYRC4YyLSjXqfHePBH2d3ns3k0o2o8o/leL4M4X15Fe0fMSDc8skU 9CXLLz3ryvyBSMQxGvds4pTu2JMICfEATJBk4T8SfpyV4z6JkZaW5w/fyDfU31k+v9VJ jdYMThhxaHSu/qzHgyW/HGKsaXA1NURXyokHhdJQgShOTk9XMP8q2LIrn3XSSmM5MDmO xzTbHbd5h+Z0RBzlaGc21UFK+Odri/LYKB5OXaaHj1bBT9PR2nONwaxnx5on1jD9viQc utvg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX4hZGCtn1p8xVzzK4Rk4IjPQAETVIDrai76e3f5ptU41m9fof62 CPNODOcMmaImj2CxoTj0d61fttGNfjO0v0yeAYQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+TgotJkk515MXolLILtRfK1XJ5ZMACmAceR8r4/dGG6mZ/b7rHHo2klnL26HOQFQJ+0p6AbvXrjQzSXBc+ScGo= X-Received: by 10.28.213.143 with SMTP id m137mr5461941wmg.67.1509995807778; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 11:16:47 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.223.146.227 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 11:16:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: NIad8GPCiJHZSukosFSmi_VzhdM X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:139515 Archived-At: On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Ken Raeburn wrote: > It appears that the emacs-26 version of defun* is happy with it (the > original Lisp code I posted, using &optional &key) as well, as long as I > provide the source, or a byte-compiled file from Emacs 25 or 26; it=E2=80= =99s the > .elc file generated by the older Emacs that=E2=80=99s causing me a proble= m. The > (new?) checks are incompatible with the the old compiled file, even thoug= h > the Lisp code itself *appears* to be acceptable still. It looks like the cl-defun in newer Emacs throws away the &optional for you in this case.