From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-26 ec02c73: Update process filter example (Bug#35044) Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 21:33:47 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20190501005253.12791.10999@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20190501005255.2DF9B2042B@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="134784"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: Emacs developers To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 10 03:34:57 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hOuR6-000Yy3-QS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 03:34:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35116 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hOuR5-0006hN-LF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 May 2019 21:34:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60637) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hOuQC-000695-1M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 May 2019 21:34:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hOuQB-0000F6-0Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 May 2019 21:33:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ot1-x32b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::32b]:37825) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hOuQA-0000Eh-PQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 May 2019 21:33:58 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ot1-x32b.google.com with SMTP id r10so3412525otd.4 for ; Thu, 09 May 2019 18:33:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=PUTLqacxonIcT8pM+Vb0gSwsQuuL878tBLvttB/WRRc=; b=KwEms+LXkBS7vGVk6e8BF7BQQjvZPwV6TB4JPDKWBDFcQ/pWwfjVgVWlJ9e6Dn6Co4 qiPgOtDgBWWjMwacXZzwH9xzH1ZyPgQxWzrgs8qlbOwul/RFeU3RJ94ZyN/KLtpYR0Z1 ne+xmtUPUkAdCDl77O4iDF9TfQZqgWKZUKMeg77VQRxRO7borZoY7exnllpzoDpdSY9X cvbEGZmmApPE9qF4mBIfrBG9nM7tDi1AYnv8L+dOmIclUpauD7m6uImexSYlK2D7WWBO Gx7v4Hj+p+M2JGQg6WUp2f4TcIZEUDzUBfb9P5sn9bUyEeYzvka3wiQf138sHCFJo+pi YLHA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PUTLqacxonIcT8pM+Vb0gSwsQuuL878tBLvttB/WRRc=; b=f1h9/3lCPrssZku3+5oUCnP88lmsEJRlpCtz2qTutQQHCihhbrkirREqpwpesdNR42 kZxae0p4MrbToUIM7/DYh6Kn26/+k8jZRNMNiMqJUVXI8zAImak+d1QZksroz6UvSJ+w 8P54hlplDUT/CIyJlzN9YXG5mhvIHj8bVk7dNCUgpIvcAlt1Yj8Wp8QpPnCMz/NfLlAN E3SmP5mfHr4lr8n4FdNl6XaunO3SlTgmnCYXhQMuwix/pMFzCyV17PPnk7ajAm/+2QY8 +H7QVWqzkF4NhysbZam3ulLqUzN7vft0jxBunXTvycvserZxMZUb1DHj5UzAHJbmEmMF HnmQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUZcxTEJ90fuCfghKDhxUstUmFfB7W+MduU2Bf956puB5ZVbz3F tYif2J+YrN/LdvtaWFUhTHeVlvWlM2jiQZT1Jaw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzIt56Wzr8/wbnNXFSy4KeDGiKSsDJxZLTRlpc/5DOqdjMHsg3L2zsJV2wmNrn4ihj+zDnFinb52wjdaxQXqfI= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4e97:: with SMTP id v23mr5016365otk.148.1557452037942; Thu, 09 May 2019 18:33:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::32b X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:236350 Archived-At: On Tue, 7 May 2019 at 08:43, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > > I just don't see how we can say it's almost always much better to use > > `insert', and then use `insert-before-markers' by default. > > Very easy: historical accident (and the lack of > window-point-insertion-type before Emacs-23). > > > "Do as we say, not as we do". > > More like: "don't do the same mistake we did". I guess I can live with that, though I kind of still have the urge to change it and see what breaks... Anyone else have opinions on this?