From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tests involving post-command-hook Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 19:50:14 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87bmangip8.fsf@gmx.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1533080900 25773 195.159.176.226 (31 Jul 2018 23:48:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 23:48:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: Stephen Berman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 01 01:48:16 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fkeND-0006Yg-Pb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2018 01:48:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32776 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fkePK-0002P9-EJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 19:50:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54958) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fkePB-0002Or-1e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 19:50:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fkePA-0001oE-CW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 19:50:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::235]:33471) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fkeP9-0001nr-VA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 19:50:16 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-x235.google.com with SMTP id 8-v6so7052486oip.0 for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 16:50:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=rHzqWT0DnpedRIEe6mY0YkcH2Ytr1K7YkOsrh7pUmMY=; b=PeWqEpMGxnPT072Q1h7n1eFl1LnixhHVWZLpy0cNsUP6D6ZE9J6qUqs7h1r1ge3Jc/ DR60xePDSRP4ugTZ6uzRRTh2SSEr5vNrSyiv6iAypKTJWVO1xP7FkZ504bP82DwvfYRi sqqdphiF8SAyn1nXjksgugp8jVgAx1d88TMlGzRpcPAcfAjECnyzYNq2/HCLwb2ag9oq XnVmFIrqvaQrv41nfJsIVxCYaXlVHfE2PglhT1a/jBL8ecv7JWkfZtfPmCXfJbfApI9h CEsGrF32VtZfoH4OyxhIu3cyTpHsD4G9b0jnnXC/Y0bf1mgoSnJ/M1m1c8U1Ql+esxRX g5ug== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rHzqWT0DnpedRIEe6mY0YkcH2Ytr1K7YkOsrh7pUmMY=; b=RRPSlwlr6QNWeCt8leeh/FluiTvStRFj2ASonQ4dY6dM2eabuNe+MJB+FcppQHxxwo aMENVLb+84+IaX7jSMxFWxTxbkfPbFDXuGR/q/ILH1Yk9jCXcAW/TAbCU9o/RQZYlGyI 9FTb0BT/fXeIu6B/pA+jYyq4rgpD38jB4EoFbQhsd/EHxHAQ8DxHxRdtjQV0Er66r+jv UMKZKHNs+Ge8XNXzxa7HnKGkDWhE4FQY8pXuQivgOQ4+QmY07nVJObUN6NVXuYNHnqSx aiX+Vx16MkpofQ/xWwLZZVLtvLbmXn0AjllXFvTYVB49a0NbA7XPuoo2Q4/N0BcB6VPW WHgA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlFcvxv4i3LzCMSjRFBQ7DunueTkmgsGrX06wRz6VYlNaJIttBpU NFFgoolje56fK7APAnKpf55ECDA/Mkj6dHugoyc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpeXb984hfXAq7cJu8kz/krWgAqcJHS8WZfjZlXraoud2RglXg6peU8FbkfM1kVS+um2gGlXsrJwgzz01WMbA2M= X-Received: by 2002:aca:100f:: with SMTP id 15-v6mr1227231oiq.110.1533081014956; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 16:50:14 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 2002:a9d:3495:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 16:50:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87bmangip8.fsf@gmx.net> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c06::235 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:228068 Archived-At: On 31 July 2018 at 18:10, Stephen Berman wrote: > Is this behavior of post-command-hook expected and if so, is using > run-hooks in ERT valid, i.e. is it still really testing hl-line-mode > behavior? Asking whether it's "really" testing seems in danger of getting philosophical, but you might also want to look at ert-simulate-command which runs those hooks (it doesn't perfectly simulate everything though).