From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24401: python-shell-completion-native-try returns incorrect results with python 3.5.2 Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 19:30:34 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1d47cad6-227f-280a-2645-d97b45bbda44@live.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1473463886 12171 195.159.176.226 (9 Sep 2016 23:31:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 23:31:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 24401@debbugs.gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 10 01:31:23 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1biVGN-0001sF-7a for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 01:31:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60668 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1biVGL-0001Gb-4J for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2016 19:31:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56247) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1biVGF-0001GS-RL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2016 19:31:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1biVGA-0008Lr-Qy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2016 19:31:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57284) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1biVGA-0008Ln-NR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2016 19:31:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1biVGA-0006fU-Ah for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2016 19:31:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 23:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24401 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24401-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24401.147346384325603 (code B ref 24401); Fri, 09 Sep 2016 23:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24401) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Sep 2016 23:30:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54996 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1biVFr-0006et-BH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2016 19:30:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-f49.google.com ([209.85.218.49]:36434) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1biVFo-0006eg-OC for 24401@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2016 19:30:41 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-f49.google.com with SMTP id q188so58399417oia.3 for <24401@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 09 Sep 2016 16:30:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Vrw5vXq5vpS+mCG/Y830OLTit4ibvFwNpNCG1wc3gXc=; b=UhfCyxhekiUnN7dcLqb0NX6eOjGSzCleHtPjIVTuFtj9cvWbaxwZAuFPuY3k95D0Gx malC4NBJzfDUU7bFMDJKW5If7DBdF2WwGc3eYiWRJQZOm/jdNE2w5aiaEDFZQT7QUR5y FjU6tktwqE1A6afwnabQxOwJxakqEriOQ0N4Zsnl5wp41fvRjgga0FtcvIOiCWoaTJuv 7tGIqDjNSOZe9h27HfOS1ht66Y/wewMwXosdVuISi7Gi3rKUqursq4z7yGI2wgCM7dRA HcNgrAiFV6ulMmRvnM+bDCgy0PEU+PT6Mq0bkRga/nNNZLlk0jSqA4ECvbTtxcwqpTp6 o1kg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Vrw5vXq5vpS+mCG/Y830OLTit4ibvFwNpNCG1wc3gXc=; b=XlFLx61Mhi2Q0Zhx0P6C5xIVMv9y63+MxhhyucJGQn6x6UV21B2WVsF2hSYG2hlyhu +zWzZ2ma5Le/zs6S2dh53N8zLxNW78H8FQrQsIUyJ2vUaZazxTkHIxiI8x08ZDZCx97s 2h916tghMG/IreIu4MiaSeeEW5+iE2bANnxRBpKzCxM1ShswEJzNWMf3ahHvVOn+g339 uaLUC90wqlDEYOrUkLPLdmdSQ0yFeA5rVMtI/BrA2WSzg+Sph4tUwGv5tYQuyWz7vU8f 7u3siOek4io7pAmUDMGc5lAqV4TbQgFUhLDGK5Z7G1Tdb3Cymzvqd8ypEgccAnsa7hK7 Trwg== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPN1APVfH0ifXMiEIo0+1QFWNm1fq6yBmmpqVCIZ0dfbLw6+c4LRQCNKmXLmx0TRW2n7t74Qgq1mcYT8A== X-Received: by 10.157.43.109 with SMTP id f42mr7806049otd.77.1473463834980; Fri, 09 Sep 2016 16:30:34 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.157.41.144 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 16:30:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1d47cad6-227f-280a-2645-d97b45bbda44@live.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: x0h5oQUeuV5CnuGVEEHuCJHd5tg X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:123130 Archived-At: On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 7:07 PM, Cl=C3=A9ment Pit--Claudel wrote: > Hi all, > > Calling =E2=80=98run-python=E2=80=99 in =E2=80=98emacs -Q=E2=80=99 with = =E2=80=98python-shell-interpreter=E2=80=99 set to "python3", I get the foll= owing warning: > > Warning (python): Your =E2=80=98python-shell-interpreter=E2=80=99 doe= sn=E2=80=99t seem to support > readline, yet =E2=80=98python-shell-completion-native=E2=80=99 was t = and "python3" is not > part of the =E2=80=98python-shell-completion-native-disabled-interpre= ters=E2=80=99 list. > Native completions have been disabled locally. > > This warning is specific to Python 3 (it doesn't happen with Python 2.7).= Additionally, the warning is spurious; native completion works fine. This= whole feature is new in Emacs 25. I'm not familiar enough with Python tooling to say much about this, but it seems similar (maybe identical) to #22897?