From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: sendmail.el Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 18:05:37 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1472335556 24002 195.159.176.226 (27 Aug 2016 22:05:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 22:05:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 28 00:05:53 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bdljc-0005k8-6E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 00:05:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37326 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bdljY-0001YP-L8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 18:05:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49355) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bdljT-0001Y8-97 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 18:05:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bdljR-0004YM-Ck for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 18:05:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22e]:36619) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bdljO-0004Wq-Kw; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 18:05:38 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id f189so153837752oig.3; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 15:05:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=sCSKdGCED1czI3ysqZAvSDTBOoSrjwS24gwfBUrJdrE=; b=RXHSekykQiQ07gz7pibnClyzB7wbD4uctiHBUBnieWClai653E9YN22RCK1e0yoPe+ h5IMN8EYcCnkMKNpQjildK4SYDd/ZUuI15B+TjNTlQlZqRLljLiulgFlX5zKOC69F9Kt yGNqb1cOBs2tABGdMVBjyVcC/J5X2Tp9AZJH+zDQAc2akYZR4mwxrLvhsiVprQofH3VG 2VEujElzca3mLaTdeNjEJAV1kR3YTGhRgg5ujwXu4rAcfO99gCWe7Jw+SxyhtPS7As2C /jS3teVFXotiocvNx5wpl4wJUPlFGN32RMKIS4+hXjquIEwBN0eR00hMc2pOe50kpOsA ms8w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sCSKdGCED1czI3ysqZAvSDTBOoSrjwS24gwfBUrJdrE=; b=ji07l7ngp3cBeZWpmPTMy0pqiGrUqK/RL38GZQpZAn/HtX6IF9UMB9UwXWYBjdEJW7 xNNXtc2pgRUghOVQynnX6pNxvheCzjk1f8+HOBMX3GktVb7UQKyCc6AXefJnF6gKzC2/ 8QxgZMS9CWrzyuRY+4FGTEyF++OUtEQUfvNfu8suV/t7sKTK5NklesrLi50y87khMESj vo6w0UGOp3l9eibe154I5yE44uoT/J//c+qwJU7ovLffF7i2Mw/x+AA2u0wvqrkbUxMf dhMgvz/NAwrHq711/LD1pcR0akpPoPIeLbpxsQ+1U7HgdAlTgTb+xsUEfht6pGUk67DH L9fA== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwMaO0a2HTAoJZJwT3EQe109A+k+7NFdGDujrG1s9loS+1YeD9viRFDsIVqLenyr09HfXkeqkXqXZ59oQA== X-Received: by 10.202.245.88 with SMTP id t85mr6639827oih.202.1472335537897; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 15:05:37 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.157.11.125 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 15:05:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: V1oOl5_V6iF6jvDTEkuBZWX0MXQ X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:206840 Archived-At: On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Richard Stallman wrote: > This patch may be needed in Emacs 25. Would someone please check? The function `mail-combine-fields' hasn't changed since you introduced it in 79a16968 Wed Aug 12 11:25:26 2015 "Offer to combine multiple To or CC fields[...]". So the bug is present on both emacs-25 and master branches. But I guess it's too late to fix for 25.1 by now.