From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should `ido-everywhere` override `completing-read-function`? Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 22:45:50 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1492829164 19527 195.159.176.226 (22 Apr 2017 02:46:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 02:46:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: Tianxiang Xiong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 22 04:45:56 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d1l3b-0004rZ-HJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 04:45:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33911 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1l3f-00073u-TB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 22:45:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43653) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1l3Z-0006vZ-2N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 22:45:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1l3Y-0001Tw-9h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 22:45:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::230]:33279) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1l3Y-0001Tk-4H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 22:45:52 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-x230.google.com with SMTP id y11so84904779oie.0 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 19:45:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=ZXL259yKvLnveqmXVM+5UayWrXVmJkK6p2Hjcnf8kaA=; b=YtS4TjRPv3Hss0Kzr6rd3FdZ8CZdzFw0sW8WG6yTUosK0UbnBo5YM0p+Cb6wMnyE4T ZpWtX4UqVQpmkz98rAeO0F9DBRDHCNAPV0VMlnPGlFCuKhSqw/AZTIjA85YvTH4bsX6Y VjSpspvmGWttHPlDFI5W35/WMhgEQeCG2ozVJDye9ZUER25lWh2oL1j6obZP38HDNheD kEzx/g2U+I3/KxrnamUaIls/dw0TBjWHWY+TvfopL9KLPZ+mufwCe1O+xEdYyfYbBiIu PJO/4e/0dcYiUYa8mvCx7RcEqNFXn6gg8YA3B1ARYpsEs6Y0EUeR9W8YtC4o6ud4sxjq UisA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZXL259yKvLnveqmXVM+5UayWrXVmJkK6p2Hjcnf8kaA=; b=imhleFpcltoydKEdRheQEY0ksLFaiyePo0UQlsASGUMe5Ty9MfHUti/nNQ8zFdNA4I nX+qTVIwChRk7kwGHl67Yi0tD80YlNuRSTJN+FbJ1dM8+6oJkeBcs95M6pKM07CkWiBB Qs1YEcwA4xGThyndIcmNUwXrjHnRDw0Xmm49CtUSGA8Yicj+L86BuzvWgERVKrwcaAjf Yt64n+WUPNdPAlSKzT/U4PtDvmz/FMIhtqBBbWEIW6xcHKB1fitaiaRwrpZG66LvRtp8 TmKNGBlrg/WpipncSYYBCVawLjP2xeJwoTwkc4Up7EeLhLIj0qKSInbMqw/bMdbmfG5Q ggCw== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/7/2NMZhScOR/TDTwGPWtlXc3qtUcuXYhg5ean6WRwX8q5Vgi2L OEKCrz4jIdTh0yro/K+DrIbGT1T2IA== X-Received: by 10.157.36.4 with SMTP id p4mr10427923ota.267.1492829151312; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 19:45:51 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.157.9.178 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 19:45:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: H0-QBuELE2_p8Aqo5DkODKuF8wA X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c06::230 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:214203 Archived-At: On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 9:23 PM, Tianxiang Xiong wrote: > In `ido.el`, the `ido-everywhere` minor mode overrides > `read-file-name-function` and `read-buffer-function`. However, it does not > override `completing-read-function` with `ido-completing-read`. > > Should it? This is what Helm does, and it is convenient for the user. ido-completing-read currently does not entirely replace completing-read, see https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=15430 https://github.com/DarwinAwardWinner/ido-ubiquitous