From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Refactoring flymake.el Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 14:52:58 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87378q2r62.fsf@lolita> <6b4255cf-76c8-c6f3-15e4-b8fc97d4d2d2@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1503082463 29630 195.159.176.226 (18 Aug 2017 18:54:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 18:54:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: Sam Steingold Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 18 20:54:19 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dimPO-0007BD-St for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 20:54:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50045 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dimPT-0006Bo-NG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 14:54:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33025) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dimOE-00069w-JM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 14:53:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dimOE-0003Y7-06 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 14:53:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::234]:32804) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dimOC-0003XP-QX; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 14:53:00 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-x234.google.com with SMTP id f11so105349413oic.0; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 11:52:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=9R0pavS3JWcbXn1XszPzyDUHlyM5vZuHUsT/rY0JTsI=; b=Sz+L+UtjeyepyPAPpFlOulDzWXqvybpXViVtIrp/q/rcGswMcdJ674MjctVzrxQg0K UwH26Nd26sXpMnCHTpKxdoeGRaUjT6tgD2Fe689m4nQM3gEdEtAfdWP2B3e0lWR4CdF5 0XS0g77t9V92ah7d929uGlUHXMJHx1VfsQxHGlW4ybpEH38E1/Olf559xWgEYzucdt0V KK2xxILsVRNjAb4jGGnYK7P2mI+w901kx0QNbipVJLsCJLD2ffXyQG6gDKPAu/mw/eJb BuH1dmlsMhOfz9eESPGwz24zYNyCx+2x+wn8ejOfG0gpwbsqMRm3KC2SDFSSymB2ozpL bwFg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9R0pavS3JWcbXn1XszPzyDUHlyM5vZuHUsT/rY0JTsI=; b=sVgzuixNg2e8J/NAHOwIO9eB4QiRMZf520Z+i9ll2Gf0q+Od1a5RW5HTVwkQDz62UD h3z85MjSCVPKs0B9ZVIwKhcbZ0CeRZwmyqVVFRvriz6FXoUbQcqSEgg4k63IkoSExZki diwBvZK56OeXcHBQ81Kclxx4EpUKlBrQ1jZsVH72QNBbmpgFAGb0j01Qc+8/EjhTUrJ2 kHZEVElU1Q4jhfrq+gNOp6lUT0bcp3aFgNoyef41P7jPR3CGyfkzepQvNrfUZcCMyT53 23veYdNDMLuKPgU96aTGqD28NaiWBbPjaEKVi9sCsBUpNzMAS5piyKXuFFBAtXyeqMic c1ew== X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5hgHIZ5ASyGAbjukoU7byB4DR1nSNTj/pBzyA9je7n1lkKRtEEY VzUVbwgIZ2eM2T6DWUpARUuew2fDOA== X-Received: by 10.202.181.130 with SMTP id e124mr11613877oif.96.1503082378483; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 11:52:58 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.74.18.129 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 11:52:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: Vb5H-t1KRrv0k5bC4bIiRMyZ1ho X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c06::234 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:217617 Archived-At: On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Sam Steingold wrote: > > PS. Do people really hate the `flymake-disallowed-file-name-regexp' patch? > Why? I don't see that anybody "hates" it, but rather there are questions about existing alternatives, because we want to avoid adding yet-another-option that might turn out to be redundant. Speaking of, it looks to me that (push (list "scratch[.]py\\'" nil) flymake-allowed-file-name-masks) would give the effect you want?