From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Brand <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: org-table-copy-down incrementor
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 18:26:52 +0200
Message-ID: <CALn3zojfEj-5CXiWGDX24F6qWu0Desh_M_PGVgyHmCWotJnhKg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <26CB62FB-01B3-49F6-A3E2-61FC25825493@oracle.com>
	<87ioq8ym8g.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
	<CALn3zoi5LWVNV__76XcTG7dO7oK3CM9758pPfNaY+zzmEmSg6A@mail.gmail.com>
	<87k39gilps.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47421)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com>) id 1WmmsT-0005wQ-Fc
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 May 2014 12:26:58 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com>) id 1WmmsS-0001wK-KY
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 May 2014 12:26:57 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87k39gilps.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Cc: Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Stacey Marshall <stacey.marshall@oracle.com>

Hi Bastien

On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> wrote:
> Michael Brand <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com> writes:
>> For me it would be already enough and preferred when the increment
>> would be the same as in the two fields above point.
>
> I pushed a change in master for this --

Thank you for implementing this.

> can you please check it works as expected for you?

Yes it does: SHIFT-RET on the last row of the tables
    | 2 |
    | 5 |
and
    | 2 |
and
    | [2014-04-30 Wed] |
    | [2014-05-07 Wed] |
and
    | [2014-04-30 Wed] |
increment as expected.

As I see only now the use case
    |  1.1 |
    | -0.5 |
does not seem easy to increment by -1.6 due to the formatting of the
result, so I don't expect it to be implemented. (number-to-string is
not enough because of the inaccuracy of the fraction.)

> (const :tag "Don't increment the value when copying a field" t)))

Wasn't the t meant to be nil?

Michael