From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sam Halliday Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19983: 24.4; exit-emacs regression in 24.4? Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 19:42:24 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87pp8rc9e5.fsf@gmail.com> <83egp6qef7.fsf@gnu.org> <87k2yrvea4.fsf@gmail.com> <83d24jlb52.fsf@gnu.org> <83bnk3lacu.fsf@gnu.org> <87a8znumft.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f96be9e18e30510f459e6 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1426016600 20042 80.91.229.3 (10 Mar 2015 19:43:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 19:43:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19983@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 10 20:43:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YVQ3b-00067H-EX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 20:43:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51124 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVQ3a-0000OQ-Kn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 15:43:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55046) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVQ3W-0000Nl-Me for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 15:43:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVQ3S-0000iQ-Oj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 15:43:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43374) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVQ3S-0000iI-Ig for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 15:43:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YVQ3S-0000fQ-5N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 15:43:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Sam Halliday Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 19:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19983 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 19983-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19983.14260165542518 (code B ref 19983); Tue, 10 Mar 2015 19:43:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19983) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Mar 2015 19:42:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41942 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YVQ2z-0000eX-SE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 15:42:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ig0-f171.google.com ([209.85.213.171]:41663) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YVQ2x-0000eH-2i for 19983@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 15:42:31 -0400 Original-Received: by igal13 with SMTP id l13so6897451iga.0 for <19983@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 12:42:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=861FrjBcWX0N+mOHI1a7f6212KqTV1s8XV3ZacjC3xw=; b=vggutQ2cckvT8ZMV9t5qS7MtvgZrUgCEPDHZDii2ESmDyX+aq0fPbtwMXa6+9yd1Rz hDrWneeiWPxIS0xbEOOVlfNo6OeCOmwRAfzlIalFRYk1Z6cItYT+7lkgXuYatfNDPSw2 NBgqhQrei5lxepHscYPXYlhiVWESKF0qFxYD+sjkUHA7AtjMS3p6t/qkKX0a/wVS4prJ NFy7hMmKq0OGNKOnisvVFlV7U+QmYaIAxdk6klvC8ahiB3znSiPD0su2fD5tRz4HaIC5 S4YbKLNpz8GDSGFOVmhtTVmQVA67eV0kWkXCMCAXrQ1RHbl4+U0/cQYzEQ3NhkrjgHb5 Ox2g== X-Received: by 10.107.129.141 with SMTP id l13mr50787723ioi.91.1426016545147; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 12:42:25 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.36.39.203 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 12:42:24 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.36.39.203 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 12:42:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:100358 Archived-At: --001a113f96be9e18e30510f459e6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Yeah it's weird. I asked git to stay between 24.4 (bad) and 24.3 (good). I tried it again with return 155 but again it jumped outside the bound. I'll have to read up on cut biscect. It's not behaving as expected. A minimal reproducible case would certainly get the thanks of my ludicrously overheated CPUs right about now! :-P On 10 Mar 2015 19:30, "Glenn Morris" wrote: > Sam Halliday wrote: > > > 5f53d2441abf6eafe8e14f29d73e14afe8bec35f is the first bad commit > > This commit first appeared in Emacs 23.4. > > This makes no sense, since you previously said that the issue (whatever > it actually is) was not present in 24.1, 24.2, or 24.3. So why are you > even bisecting over such old revisions? You might want to repeat your > bisection but only over the range corresponding to the 24.3 and 24.4 > releases. > > (Personally I think this report is suffering from a lack of a minimal > reproducible example.) > --001a113f96be9e18e30510f459e6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Yeah it's weird. I asked git to stay between 24.4 (bad) = and 24.3 (good). I tried it again with return 155 but again it jumped outsi= de the bound.

I'll have to read up on cut biscect. It's not behavi= ng as expected.

A minimal reproducible case would certainly get the thanks o= f my ludicrously overheated CPUs right about now! :-P

On 10 Mar 2015 19:30, "Glenn Morris" &= lt;rgm@gnu.org> wrote:
Sam Halliday wrote:

> 5f53d2441abf6eafe8e14f29d73e14afe8bec35f is the first bad commit

This commit first appeared in Emacs 23.4.

This makes no sense, since you previously said that the issue (whatever
it actually is) was not present in 24.1, 24.2, or 24.3. So why are you
even bisecting over such old revisions? You might want to repeat your
bisection but only over the range corresponding to the 24.3 and 24.4
releases.

(Personally I think this report is suffering from a lack of a minimal
reproducible example.)
--001a113f96be9e18e30510f459e6--