On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 1:19 PM Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:

> Yes, it is. <SOME KEY SEQUENCE> is, of course, TAB. Here is a patch
> for people to try out which I will push in a few days time if there are
> no objections. Cc-ing completion-style specialist Stefan.

Implementing it as a completion style seems wrong.

What is "it"? "It" === "Eli's suggestion"?

Why not just tweak the completion table?

What tweak do you suggest? The explicit point in this patch

was _not_ to list shorthands as completions, for the reasons

that I gave many times already and that led to Eli's suggestion.

If you can implement that without a completion style that's fine

(but it seems it's the nicest way).

João