From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62750: 29.0.50; Commands 'package-update' and 'package-update-all' should be called '*-upgrade' Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 15:36:52 +0100 Message-ID: References: <2726a957-a2a8-3b89-8930-2d620d83491e@alphapapa.net> <83sfd7c1v1.fsf@gnu.org> <875ya3euof.fsf@posteo.net> <87fs95a6y3.fsf@posteo.net> <87y1mxrz90.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34938"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 62750@debbugs.gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov , Stefan Monnier , Adam Porter , Eli Zaretskii , Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 12 16:38:24 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pmbc6-0008ua-Rk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 16:38:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmbbo-00072L-JT; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:38:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmbbm-00071u-H2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmbbm-0002ba-80 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmbbl-00032g-VO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:38:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 14:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62750 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62750-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62750.168131023111622 (code B ref 62750); Wed, 12 Apr 2023 14:38:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62750) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Apr 2023 14:37:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40582 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmbax-00031O-1Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:37:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oa1-f48.google.com ([209.85.160.48]:44748) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmbau-00031A-O9 for 62750@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:37:10 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oa1-f48.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-1842f69fe1fso13873869fac.11 for <62750@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 07:37:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1681310223; x=1683902223; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=67jWtl/MZHWG+S16H8szE0s8PJaEGdDY6/js9F0qF0U=; b=iqECsxYy+pE3J7cjEG1Q0Nq02dkD4BmevDoexjkZcXYfgAi4yF7rzbRmmC0CICJMft 3wqOpJiGTdmBaRkmL/RDZ/LjQdQfmRR+/WrBQWvHeHEs5EJ8DYXIQqOXbKiJyURsrfgK B+MbiWUqYhu6653ue2MupDv5wT7Hu1u0NTQDqiNaAdHIy1ZNQmWL7fBUUZ/QtzZXcIEm UlZyDymHW3ZO7t9w8ya9/jzYeyeDhkkYUX3WOO3oPDYO4w2AJ/Ts1CO5lhz/qx/S9qkS zLHqrtca5iQGcrOr5HVgGLKM8xhfeS0n732oic8rSRUU/SeBPAVpXf+Ok6MqfzHEhoIV NWgg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1681310223; x=1683902223; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=67jWtl/MZHWG+S16H8szE0s8PJaEGdDY6/js9F0qF0U=; b=FGMOBUcuiQB9rlGw8LYr8r+z1mlIDmKFYLJM5LMJyy9Ony4YY+AQLW79fuM5e4T3uG FCew7OqEwFyCpX/a3MXRy3cnY+orEygXirssnlFiaspPqc9yQF2kyHnVrfLfs8Vyt+uy cydsDqL421CX3QfFWH24wmxh2LzGF6qlf7WYLzBF+svXlgiYRhbvbtOVFjJzHeOlJyeC dgbvHtLoZLdenpxVIk53Z9qdJFxAxz5AGJlCvkTaX1wG21+0YlT90/2aD5Faj/kGKIW7 rY3B7mx0J2uUsChS3uxawoh25/UL1uzsVFIwwjtnqnpjy+68Igy3IYugw2NoUZrOc7Kl 6z3Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9figglfrQ8mRvrtPjAsAgSywruMoAeaFjxeAfoABUIq38EHxlNm UXCp9f32WUwuayQp/tvMIpF7u3E0ipvAGIoeAqU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350ad56Wjx7aFROlPq9Rt33zKfmWiSRSkHmECHiC1iyMhidnNWnRUPUQ5ozA+wVQNXob1U/jkVy9kSYyE65vl1VU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:e24c:b0:184:2097:e64f with SMTP id d12-20020a056870e24c00b001842097e64fmr3028808oac.5.1681310223011; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 07:37:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87y1mxrz90.fsf@posteo.net> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:259753 Archived-At: On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 2:45=E2=80=AFPM Philip Kaludercic wrote: > > Stefan Monnier writes: > > >>> It's annoyingly late to rename, but if we rename without compatibilit= y > >>> aliases (which seems to be an option since these are new in Emacs-29)= , > >>> then I'd be in favor. > >> > >> What are compatibility aliases? I must have missed something? > > > > I thought we'd rename `package-update` to `package-upgrade` by adding > > the new name and marking the old name as an obsolete alias (a > > "compatibility alias"). > > > > I hadn't realized that `package-update` hasn't been in a release yet, s= o > > we don't need such a compatibility alias. > > If this were to happen, I'd like to also be able to rename the analogous > package-vc commands to upgrade as well. > > (On a related topic I have been wondering if package-update should > handle package-vc packages at all, or if that was a mistake?) Also, in the off-chance that no-one has noticed yet the new package-update-*commands and the older package-menu*upgrade commands use entirely different logic to discover what _can_ be updated. Only by sheer skill or luck will this logic match exactly. Jo=C3=A3o