From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38992: 27.0.60; when enabled, fido-mode seems to break vc-git-grep Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 14:27:47 +0000 Message-ID: References: <288610218.111246.1578330546916@office.mailbox.org> <944631362.128066.1578605073103@office.mailbox.org> <98df50d8-44fb-448e-e893-f20601f1ca54@yandex.ru> <51d12435-274b-be14-95b8-f790804f1a61@yandex.ru> <157c6af1-c900-188d-490c-4f48ea17da3d@yandex.ru> <5dc9535d-9b2f-56f1-2e63-b75ff3aaaf55@yandex.ru> <9da3ee1b-7315-41d2-192b-9db470d50ba4@yandex.ru> <83blqik9wv.fsf@gnu.org> <838slhglog.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008fdafb059dd4f624" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="118251"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 38992@debbugs.gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov , Stefan Monnier , waah@yellowfrog.io To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 05 15:29:12 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1izLfz-000UgV-OH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 15:29:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48200 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1izLfy-0008IC-LT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 09:29:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53116) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1izLfr-0008Hu-Lv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 09:29:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1izLfq-00059e-Ja for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 09:29:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39276) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1izLfq-000591-GM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 09:29:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1izLfq-0002pm-AQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 09:29:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 14:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38992 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 38992-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38992.158091288710829 (code B ref 38992); Wed, 05 Feb 2020 14:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38992) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2020 14:28:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45249 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1izLew-0002ob-Nb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 09:28:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-io1-f50.google.com ([209.85.166.50]:39019) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1izLeu-0002oH-Jl for 38992@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 09:28:05 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-io1-f50.google.com with SMTP id c16so2314772ioh.6 for <38992@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 06:28:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XS9M9WxgCsfoU5XV03zjkAoKTbrTOqr4PCoXrc2X/OY=; b=dpFSoORhqevMKFuKI75FOwoC3oAqyVu2bWwA3ZVIeTRJJqyx2oVrt4ri76pRIaBYO/ 12EdBZeH/bHGTkd44hlsntg00iYAgbDKDxrLkUMx4tRPNjmqV78EoHEMNyPjRkxDxnPF ShL1pVcKVF5NBOtRUcCy4XcYD+MgwQTVvMQNYrg+8wpTWsrL1aNvs/Yl5Xj4Rugs0VrZ GcqV1y7FTst+jEyLziky1GcTuFc/6qLY1rSu/aXNgNyOQ4r+YFwUCNztTBhmE5cN9poo l3vMDH0lIo1hw4VcG5tGE16ZbMjfULzpfLTXyWkmAe07CfTZwb+N+s4KzmIKQzZ5PLjU vjFA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XS9M9WxgCsfoU5XV03zjkAoKTbrTOqr4PCoXrc2X/OY=; b=iUld8b1cwxNw7hPg9KZi/paUoavRYYtexPp2h8gWgSMA2PBAQKTMIcbFsHOWncrdpw VnWjTizMPDqtQgGDrMlzt5ClCtO40hHpry7ovrN6AdIfmYtfJmQZef1UYyEVF1jpch/O AQvknpoFG/dUmx9KbGnqwGQyfxachulAUvQsaRS45CvRC85UgUW824vW5gdayT9GLnld miEyYaQ5/3RhI9dBw+pG1+PPMU5b1xMvhoxBIs6WgIRDOi9BNsKP9ZHu2F4shEdaBMCc 8OwWCWXtHf7TZZ0Of3p+DbWZms7qSAb6p9f2gMro8kyH3lDH9AYJpO66YSH25NSCVLOc iRbQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVIoDFMfnpd9+dZiyh/q+kmhzzzjtwYwQi+P8aTI/Iun6VxC1xl +d/Ms0EhjT5tsIqoLMfmkeSbI9z57BugbEpdAbg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyd1VdguMZD4EXXGgZt+/pHZBgBFJvnwlSNpKVM7duo+X9ebBMYo8xk+zKl7cHaDsFMn/ppujaSFj7xzYJTUHg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:72c:: with SMTP id j12mr29768321jad.136.1580912878801; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 06:27:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <838slhglog.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:175696 Archived-At: --0000000000008fdafb059dd4f624 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 2:21 PM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Is the problem this attempts to fix really serious? Or is it just a > minor inconvenience? It isn't the original one that started the bug > report, right? > If I can shed some light on this: you're right, it's not. With the original problem fixed, Dmitry came to what can be seen as a UI deficiency in fido-mode. After analysing this with Stefan, we arrived at the conclusion that it was actually a problem in some longstanding minibuffer.el workings. At some point, a new variable was proposed, but I think Dmitry and Stefan then agreed that co-opting an existing variable wouldn't have a great impact. Maybe, Dmitry, we could revert to the earlier proposal with the new variable and somehow deprecate/discourage use of the one you're trying to change? That should be safe and bring all the benefits of your change, right? Jo=C3=A3o --=20 Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora --0000000000008fdafb059dd4f624 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 2:21 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
Is the problem this attempts to fix really serious?=C2=A0 Or is it just a minor inconvenience?=C2=A0 It isn't the original one that started the b= ug
report, right?

If I can shed some light= on this: you're right, it's not.

With the= original problem fixed, Dmitry came to what can be seen as a
UI deficiency in fido-mode.=C2=A0 After analysing this with Stefan, we ar= rived
at the conclusion that it was actually a problem in some lo= ngstanding
minibuffer.el workings.=C2=A0 At some point, a new= variable was proposed,
but I think Dmitry and Stefan then agreed= that co-opting an existing
variable wouldn't have a gre= at impact.

Maybe, Dmitry, we could revert to the e= arlier proposal with the new
variable and somehow deprecate/disco= urage use of the one you're
trying to change?=C2=A0 That= should be safe and bring all the benefits of
your change, right?=

Jo=C3=A3o


=


--
Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora
--0000000000008fdafb059dd4f624--