From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 15:14:11 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87a5zj2vfo.fsf@gmail.com> <87y1mz38rl.fsf@posteo.net> <87ile2n0kn.fsf@gmail.com> <83v8i2abqi.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn2ilgx7.fsf@gmail.com> <83a5ze9uc1.fsf@gnu.org> <831qkq9rpy.fsf@gnu.org> <83pm898xb9.fsf@gnu.org> <87h6tlleg0.fsf@gmail.com> <8335558qc7.fsf@gnu.org> <83sfd5761f.fsf@gnu.org> <87zg7djrgr.fsf@gmail.com> <83o7nt73za.fsf@gnu.org> <83mt3d73c2.fsf@gnu.org> <87r0sptinq.fsf@posteo.net> <83jzyh706c.fsf@gnu.org> <875ya1tdwf.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29168"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 62720@debbugs.gnu.org, Philip Kaludercic , Eli Zaretskii To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 12 16:15:21 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pmbFp-0007Js-1M for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 16:15:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmbFZ-0007jl-IN; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:15:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmbFX-0007ig-4l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:15:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmbFW-0004xC-Rq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:15:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmbFW-0002Qz-Lc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:15:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 14:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62720 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62720-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62720.16813088719291 (code B ref 62720); Wed, 12 Apr 2023 14:15:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62720) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Apr 2023 14:14:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40548 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmbF0-0002Pn-VZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:14:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi1-f175.google.com ([209.85.167.175]:37638) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmbEz-0002PW-3c for 62720@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:14:30 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi1-f175.google.com with SMTP id bm45so2061726oib.4 for <62720@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 07:14:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1681308863; x=1683900863; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=CdPDb+UPASKPbjGsn7EwlwlumcZZXA6fVygqvRiXzl0=; b=BipLAPIZ2deYyy4YvlkmuPpRD13e4HBXoyTNlATj7k1z+2m0dyvgDzQF532MvL8aZJ kcPf99fbrHxWeth1b1ZX/fCcO5TTSeFt4QEUFN6ZnfUt0HCl1j8fLgWQIQkPmQCG/Z1f T0YkAH7CJ9rh31Pb9HtMCLwzP0UNOtYvb0HlkRwDn6dBHy84dwJ5JpHTlYY5jN3p+T88 w5s7dzsY5y8LzGxtiNNyTld7THZ+7atneHB6jOGpkeKPfkY03wuJ0ub6Tcc6XxJ/6IeN tI2Mutl0S8uYoQcNbtS84DRmK/SIqtTfq8ZLlXwzwWKk2GL7FDk5SMFJkTcw6yxdX01Y rxOQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1681308863; x=1683900863; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=CdPDb+UPASKPbjGsn7EwlwlumcZZXA6fVygqvRiXzl0=; b=Q8sQN2aGtL2aJcDQwiOo7ptQLFs6O5+THy7XRwodmn+h4PDdZEFTr/72ATpXR7hII3 ch9OfvwccpsHqeIHo7hhk2QJJawCSYpcBTswI08chZqXiLVqs8XClycRM82eVQNVzRV5 5i77hdAfFDK1HG4atJU4DxddnX4edS0S0wLvK731LjXHBzYtNyCRhZjqeWTxBqL9rmUQ XyVOj6pL+ZB23ylfL8KjTOxHcSVllXnLCFaJkHyip+RqBVAmBOfCyf+Sq6qXNzSUFX2D 5jqShFbJpg1IcSnRZKTDSa7Q927szZwJdHpDp1d67VKOVP8XjaP2nAn6Rkfg99Es6ek+ qEBg== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9fun3JxaLgX9de75clbS3F7EOBP36co0NiUdhl+48CuxwM999eV sLrK5ParG6ennSQcu/wMI0egpKTBMXk5HmNxViE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350b5RZNvOXFWWY77IRV5xLycI2vz+mvlmqHQFWFywKtnctV+GwoR5tnJcls8O3yw2mMzuUZ0PCWY++N5/CWkgCY= X-Received: by 2002:aca:2404:0:b0:38b:fed6:2771 with SMTP id n4-20020aca2404000000b0038bfed62771mr356723oic.5.1681308863260; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 07:14:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:259748 Archived-At: On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 3:11=E2=80=AFPM Stefan Monnier wrote: > > >>> +(defun package-core-p (package) > >>> + "Return non-nil the built-in version of PACKAGE is loaded." > >> > >> Didn't you say the "core" terminology was confusing people? > > > > TBH I am not really satisfied with the name (so any other suggestion is > > just as fine for me), and as Joao said it would be better to make the > > predicate as internal so that users are not expected to deal with it. > > Beside "core" and "built-in" (with or without dash), another name that's > been used over the years is "bundled". I don't have a strong preference > between those. Isn't "bundled" better left for when non-core, non-builtin ELPA packages are somehow thrown together with the Emacs release tarball or the platform-specific builds we make of them? Jo=C3=A3o