From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 21:08:32 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87a5zj2vfo.fsf@gmail.com> <87wn2modrm.fsf@posteo.net> <87ile6o2ov.fsf@posteo.net> <87y1mz38rl.fsf@posteo.net> <87ile2n0kn.fsf@gmail.com> <83v8i2abqi.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn2ilgx7.fsf@gmail.com> <83a5ze9uc1.fsf@gnu.org> <831qkq9rpy.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000eaeb9605f9150ea8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40513"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 62720@debbugs.gnu.org, "Philip K." , Stefan Monnier To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 11 22:09:16 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pmKIl-000AIH-Pd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 22:09:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmKIa-00014g-0e; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 16:09:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmKIY-00013b-SC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 16:09:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmKIY-000082-JO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 16:09:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmKIY-0008Sg-2V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 16:09:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 20:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62720 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62720-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62720.168124373232505 (code B ref 62720); Tue, 11 Apr 2023 20:09:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62720) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Apr 2023 20:08:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38352 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmKIN-0008SC-Me for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 16:08:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ot1-f50.google.com ([209.85.210.50]:33534) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmKIL-0008Ru-2U for 62720@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 16:08:50 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ot1-f50.google.com with SMTP id i15-20020a9d610f000000b006a11f365d13so3720942otj.0 for <62720@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 13:08:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1681243723; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=mufq+HY4bI6rVEvYbH7jJwFKBlognjT+37l2OADxltg=; b=mtUc8wVmMD6gocccyGX068GQpM4SRF+a13nFllJUVRlO7lVOrlzjggDKEdc3DJlCTa 0k96Q3AI3JT2/Z2zfT6awf17GvO1S5tUPuLe85nL95fWYB6Oipatpw4I9iqgXxXy9g/w phSHQcXg32/ufiB3h8Yhw7A10FieQngcB+BA47KK0YbxjEEdS5eofRmmRN8f0eBNOSQZ mHSRVEXR86AdVpwitdT6/lZpCX0jInp56Od7xIoe958IF5e1quaN1Is/SOqzyWha3IN0 /Ot11dfK3k4XHEWQGEG+a9XY6o3anMuLJdNiVGnp6hebUNgzyQ9oxscIp879uRa/KuIZ 4LsQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1681243723; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=mufq+HY4bI6rVEvYbH7jJwFKBlognjT+37l2OADxltg=; b=V7l2KsRNDYwkFXBF1T7NQkN796aAD35o1H+uJdAAqRCFX9fC4r9ky+Nziy8F+thepv yV31ZsAIv8zvJdWGdecT/N6kMf3nxwZMpbkORwKXdRt/vGrqF72WE/mrzGGfwxwxuT4u +u/j1SfpgpZ7h2XoiTfCAGyLgVQuqux376+NUXSuixVxpmwf2KhCT40JhkQnT6YMCkGp fSr5wBH2jrrfjHgu7NQ0x7V59JzdexQLpmxd+G9+X2ViFK7BBmeibuAibI4O3HR+FA66 qbFHqgkLT2JdgtuYQN6OU66tWYNAHJXDpx7Yyei0Y/xtSyRMHUCmHDcaoKFiNS7VVJq/ 28MQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9fc5kGauimLnaaKFbWp+o2oa/dGuQC54AVtaIa93dXeMqWf+rYu h092NRt3dRTPzNPI7gGPdnH1sYS3auSODTpRBl8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350ZGQWOUpwDFaZWM8dRsnNbP+7a6xsuTYUVDgIQ2bcZ9uG1h1z+as0sPCFGIbCKF/R5POe7SNTf6zgS/NaeceWs= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6a04:0:b0:6a4:1459:d393 with SMTP id g4-20020a9d6a04000000b006a41459d393mr83010otn.4.1681243723458; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 13:08:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <831qkq9rpy.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:259676 Archived-At: --000000000000eaeb9605f9150ea8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 11, 2023, 19:51 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora > > Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 19:31:09 +0100 > > Cc: philipk@posteo.net, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 62720@debbugs.gnu.org= , > > > larsi@gnus.org > > > > > See above. Given the problems I mentioned, I'm allowed to doubt that > > > you yourself understand the changes well enough to vouch for them. > > > And even if you did vouch, my gray hair won't believe you. So I > > > prefer to go for much safer, if slightly less clean, changes. I hope > > > one of the two alternatives I suggested will be acceptable. > > > > If this change can't go into emacs-29, I think it's better to add > > an M-x eglot-update to eglot.el. > > That's the worst of all worlds. > Why? It's the safest option. Absolutely no package.el regression possible, and doesn't solve a problem where you don't think I've exists. > > What is the problem with the two possible solutions I suggested? > They are incongruent and not very user friendly IMO. Jo=C3=A3o > --000000000000eaeb9605f9150ea8 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023, 19:51 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> From: Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora <joaotavora@gmail.com>= ;
> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 19:31:09 +0100
> Cc: philipk@posteo.net, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 627= 20@debbugs.gnu.org,
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0larsi@gnus.org
>
> > See above.=C2=A0 Given the problems I mentioned, I'm allowed = to doubt that
> > you yourself understand the changes well enough to vouch for them= .
> > And even if you did vouch, my gray hair won't believe you.=C2= =A0 So I
> > prefer to go for much safer, if slightly less clean, changes.=C2= =A0 I hope
> > one of the two alternatives I suggested will be acceptable.
>
> If this change can't go into emacs-29, I think it's better to = add
> an M-x eglot-update to eglot.el.

That's the worst of all worlds.

Why? It's the safest option. Absolut= ely no package.el regression possible, and doesn't solve a problem wher= e you don't think I've exists.

What is the problem with the two possible solutions I suggested?

They are in= congruent and not very user friendly IMO.

=
Jo=C3=A3o
--000000000000eaeb9605f9150ea8--