João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:
> Unless I'm mistaken there are NO macros whose name starts 'def' for
> which we DON'T want to indent their uses like a `defun`.
As I've said repeatedly, you are mistaken. There's
`define-thing-chars', for instance.
Ok. Finally an example. It's that a macro? If so, it's the first time you provide an example. This is why I asked you for data earlier.
Then i'd day say to add a debug spec to define-thing-chars. Probably you already did.
Doesn't change my point. Even ifyou're holding on to a bunch more of these examples (are you?), there's still the fact that you're breaking indentation of out-of-tree code.
João