From: "João Távora" <joaotavora@gmail.com>
To: Augusto Stoffel <arstoffel@gmail.com>
Cc: 61726@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: bug#61726: [PATCH] Eglot: Support positionEncoding capability
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 10:20:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALDnm51x7gCpN3kUP4NXrC+BJ970=wTiJFqCNW5u+Wvvx8D=qw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87356vbf0b.fsf@gmail.com>
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 9:15 AM Augusto Stoffel <arstoffel@gmail.com> wrote:
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^
> > This last part shouldn't be necessary: we should move by characters,
> > not by columns. Why is it necessary?
>
> Maybe João can clarify, but I'm pretty sure this is there to support the
> UTF-16 way of counting offsets, so this ideally should move to
> eglot-move-to-lsp-abiding-column.
I have to be brutally honest here: I don't like this patch. I
appreciate the effort, I really do, and thank for guiding us its
the motions, but there are two main things I really don't like
about it, and 1 that I'm on the fence about.
The first thing I don't like is likely the reason that Eli is
confused here. The late binding of column-counting strategies
is confusing. I wrote these functions so that each one has
a separate well-defined, readable-inasmuch-as-possible,
vc-region-history-traceable, performant column-counting
strategy. The "lsp-abiding" naming might be off, I admit, but
only since LSP started supporting more than one strategy.
The second thing I don't like is also due to the late-binding idea.
This is a hotspot in Eglot, some of these functions are called
many many times, for each LSP server interaction depending
on how many document positions are exchanged (and they can
be a lot). I do remember benchmarking strategies at the time
and seeing a perceptible difference. Plus, this late-binding is
really useless as a server will guaranteedly _not_ change its
column-counting standard during the LSP session.
The third thing that I'm not crazy with but I don't mind is
the necessity to support the "utf-8" strategy. If "utf-16"
is mandatory, and we already support "utf-32" anyway, why should
we be adding this additional complexity. But, if it can be
hidden behind a new pair of functions and Eli accepts it,
I'm OK with it.
Finally, here's a patch that doesn't use late-binding, doesn't
introduce new strategies and supports "utf-32" and "utf-16"
today. As you can see, the patch is nearly trivial.
diff --git a/lisp/progmodes/eglot.el b/lisp/progmodes/eglot.el
index eea8be6d1aa..ae8afa69651 100644
--- a/lisp/progmodes/eglot.el
+++ b/lisp/progmodes/eglot.el
@@ -807,6 +807,7 @@ eglot-client-capabilities
:rangeFormatting `(:dynamicRegistration :json-false)
:rename `(:dynamicRegistration :json-false)
:inlayHint `(:dynamicRegistration :json-false)
+ :general `(:positionEncodings ["utf-32" "utf-16"])
:publishDiagnostics (list :relatedInformation :json-false
;; TODO: We can support
:codeDescription after
;; adding an appropriate UI to
@@ -1789,6 +1790,9 @@ eglot--managed-mode
(add-hook 'eldoc-documentation-functions #'eglot-signature-eldoc-function
nil t)
(eldoc-mode 1))
+ (when (eq (eglot--server-capable :positionEncoding) "utf-16")
+ (eglot--setq-saving eglot-move-to-column-function #'eglot-move-to-column)
+ (eglot--setq-saving eglot-current-column-function
#'eglot-current-column))
(cl-pushnew (current-buffer) (eglot--managed-buffers
(eglot-current-server))))
(t
(remove-hook 'after-change-functions 'eglot--after-change t)
As I said, enhancing this patch with a new pair of "current/move-to"
functions that add in utf-8 support is acceptable.
João
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-24 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-23 8:05 bug#61726: [PATCH] Eglot: Support positionEncoding capability Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-23 10:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-23 11:32 ` João Távora
2023-02-23 12:04 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-23 12:24 ` João Távora
2023-02-23 11:46 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-23 12:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-23 13:31 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-23 15:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-23 18:52 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-23 19:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-23 19:28 ` João Távora
2023-02-23 19:52 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-24 6:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-24 7:18 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-24 8:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-24 9:15 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-24 10:20 ` João Távora [this message]
2023-02-24 11:01 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-24 11:18 ` João Távora
2023-02-24 11:47 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-24 12:05 ` João Távora
2023-02-24 12:14 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-24 11:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-24 11:55 ` João Távora
2023-02-24 11:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-24 11:43 ` João Távora
2023-02-24 11:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-24 12:09 ` João Távora
2023-02-24 12:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-24 12:31 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-24 12:01 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-24 12:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-24 12:35 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-24 12:55 ` João Távora
2023-02-24 13:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-24 13:45 ` João Távora
2023-02-24 13:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-24 14:45 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-24 15:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-24 15:52 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-24 16:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-24 16:39 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-24 17:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-24 18:08 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-24 18:55 ` João Távora
2023-02-25 10:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-03-05 10:26 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-25 10:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-25 11:29 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-25 13:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-25 14:14 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-25 16:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-25 18:10 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-25 22:15 ` João Távora
2023-02-25 22:13 ` João Távora
2023-02-25 22:34 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-25 23:16 ` João Távora
2023-02-25 23:57 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-26 6:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-26 10:33 ` João Távora
2023-02-26 13:13 ` João Távora
2023-02-26 13:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-26 13:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-26 14:17 ` João Távora
2023-02-26 14:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-26 15:15 ` João Távora
2023-02-26 15:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-27 11:15 ` João Távora
2023-02-26 5:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-26 10:38 ` João Távora
2023-02-24 14:54 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-24 15:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-24 15:56 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-24 17:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-24 16:34 ` João Távora
2023-02-24 17:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-23 11:37 ` João Távora
2023-02-23 17:01 ` Felician Nemeth
2023-02-23 17:11 ` João Távora
2023-02-23 18:42 ` Augusto Stoffel
2023-02-27 10:11 ` Felician Nemeth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CALDnm51x7gCpN3kUP4NXrC+BJ970=wTiJFqCNW5u+Wvvx8D=qw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=joaotavora@gmail.com \
--cc=61726@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=arstoffel@gmail.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.