From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38992: 27.0.60; when enabled, fido-mode seems to break vc-git-grep Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 16:41:03 +0000 Message-ID: References: <288610218.111246.1578330546916@office.mailbox.org> <7293f6ca-b11d-3d2a-ad71-831135434e75@yandex.ru> <780526337.114357.1578556168662@office.mailbox.org> <944631362.128066.1578605073103@office.mailbox.org> <98df50d8-44fb-448e-e893-f20601f1ca54@yandex.ru> <51d12435-274b-be14-95b8-f790804f1a61@yandex.ru> <157c6af1-c900-188d-490c-4f48ea17da3d@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="72391"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 38992@debbugs.gnu.org, waah@yellowfrog.io, Dmitry Gutov To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 21 17:43:34 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1itwco-000Idq-5x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:43:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58000 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1itwcm-0002iy-Mm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 11:43:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39373) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1itwbN-0001I1-Jo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 11:42:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1itwbJ-00041d-V0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 11:42:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42360) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1itwbJ-00041Z-Rc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 11:42:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1itwbJ-0006RG-Oz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 11:42:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 16:42:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38992 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 38992-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38992.157962488924697 (code B ref 38992); Tue, 21 Jan 2020 16:42:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38992) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jan 2020 16:41:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48328 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1itwaj-0006QD-4A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 11:41:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qv1-f54.google.com ([209.85.219.54]:39603) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1itwae-0006Px-Ca for 38992@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 11:41:24 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-qv1-f54.google.com with SMTP id y8so1739027qvk.6 for <38992@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 08:41:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+A6+X1WzO+SZd2eB0I8hO+nUNknZkE79MjNM/oxGbYo=; b=Lm1A35PLc5grk1A38iSmjVTLrOJlr5B8gg9bxZzcVPavrqYhxJGLBmKjMJeYCDVlBT /zlhNwXOTRoB3ggU0ECE3/iFA04MSDpRvYLXTTgi2lzkQlBkJLANrT52bapNeyNdjXlU tB5vnmOokLpcdq3bmt8U80UUPoKGEGupKKREEsZCT2lij+tlTiJIYi8DHBbpBrpzp8Xr ykJqQ7DnU6lTrqsYBjhOw0/qBTquZPz5DrjTmBZMOEYJ8HDhCYpK4DM+lfmkjxGG4n3P 1i+/n+t9GQVUvtp8t8ZTBeBz33hQDgjo3NHIWlP5fHUnKYdIg+U4A7PYWj6CcCoGblNn eE4g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+A6+X1WzO+SZd2eB0I8hO+nUNknZkE79MjNM/oxGbYo=; b=m2kjbivxpBXJtXxEPkQnxzWeT7ZX0sMUoa/5GnuCF+tF1Ykg7O14QCWn5D+oKB9plz glixk4r0tbvSDFgAh457qmd6+GgwNMhg86NcYUuDI8e7wwRTlaPqTcGLVbyIGFDKcbTT L5WtZRfEjZYbHm2e4MpoE8ONGFGgzhU7xYGF15L3R1CiQglPHaGNz2idS59OyAdb4m2I gvyVbYmB+7+MU7S5Nush2qD7muHCguysp24iTMyu7vuozFqa9Tsi3X3nAzCdzOvTMpm0 /W0IgFDmdnlBlWI48ly7rLrzewdiTUlokgVGPW77Pzbu00Oj5ww+2X7XXwAJreO5bTva X2+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW4IboS3b+li/ncT6z7vika/qn1i/F3D5sWGoiL5q1GVO/5n+Kk VB1Cuy0bMowpocZ7vYiJDDljNqwwhl9xBSFnKiw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwZShEbZ/yOiWhVZ+nWkanGp7OjlosRohJ7HDzyy+tFllZHbGRm7aoDbQqzfRSWdxpgc7rFvOH2ZRb3bG/SsPw= X-Received: by 2002:ad4:514d:: with SMTP id g13mr5514554qvq.190.1579624874860; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 08:41:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:175008 Archived-At: On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 4:32 PM Stefan Monnier w= rote: > In any case I was just pointing out that adding the default to the head > of the "completion candidates" increases the cases where the current > problem shows up. Can anyone comment, or restate, for my benefit, what exactly the "current problem" is? Is it statable in the form "currently I can't use RET to , as I do in "? I've been using `fido-mode` pretty stable for the last month or so and don'= t notice any "obvious" improvements _to its intented interface_. Obviously, I am _all_ for refactorings and cleanups, but am also against any _regressions_ ;-), so if there are no very clearly defined improvements to the interface (this is a new feature, after all) , I would suggest that this work is done on master, not on emacs-27. Jo=C3=A3o