From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PL support (was: Drop the Copyright Assignment requirement for Emacs) Date: Sat, 9 May 2020 17:02:20 +0100 Message-ID: References: <9mmFgzvrBwjt_n_VJyaJdXINraNi5HsGpwq-0MLeKiJA7kG2BQA4uywrzjyz7lpRS0OZDpjEi8lspOKYUA7P_QsODsDew_8nbH960G55fmY=@protonmail.com> <87d07xamrg.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <878silajdl.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87tv18pyh4.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83zhaih0oz.fsf@gnu.org> <83pnbegsvm.fsf@gnu.org> <83imh5hby1.fsf@gnu.org> <2e4e8ce9-d857-f3e3-31cf-a40dee67bd25@yandex.ru> <83y2q1dsvh.fsf@gnu.org> <2432C664-3EEB-41F4-B8D0-B5358189957E@icloud.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="100829"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Dmitry Gutov , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel To: =?UTF-8?B?7KGw7ISx67mI?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 09 18:04:02 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jXRxJ-000Q71-EJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 09 May 2020 18:04:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44444 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXRxH-0002Hx-S8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 09 May 2020 12:03:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48864) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXRvv-0007vH-2L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 May 2020 12:02:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-io1-xd35.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::d35]:34778) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXRvt-00013t-Gh; Sat, 09 May 2020 12:02:34 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-io1-xd35.google.com with SMTP id f3so4940387ioj.1; Sat, 09 May 2020 09:02:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zHQpA0BUSQoksDp14RUo22O6tmpVLNZkLVEOX1lODmQ=; b=dfjTnlEuDYVMN7Ch0uAPCKNq/Y49cv2L1BYtUJfWtwfa9ISUI/m0AaOoEIqFiUE/T2 SsNfB69aRPYGvTC8R9W7s330QrCHjaJ3Kh4vX5FBewI3f74u7PaJrH/Gl/VNDvtGTedW lIgTQYUglh/Zi+JCVS2JIwniWhNXoMkDDqHp3PR9pxCFSAMhHVvJFrXHsx8rQpbVYxJy wtd3xwq5n62tOpeY1yC35Angfnn12TFnSBXrNCWq7lHjPzRDcFctKFNwZ/rBFtkaZEKO XVR8wyhSJ3w1xhrxJhyvPB60u7R8O9967f5tVFfV6v0g20sIydhpau+WQNf1UxfuW9Tc LCkw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zHQpA0BUSQoksDp14RUo22O6tmpVLNZkLVEOX1lODmQ=; b=uB2zrbBDn/4ZviLRR3GYqCmXfOWmmgAZNTKRWoK5Y2cTpi3uLZpKP0OkVdLC5aj+SP Lm0PXLxlCGdDjKp3jTFQiroUIX9TuRso7VA9YzjR/NX7bLeUHfH8c7Q2ITDNXP7maB9i eBrenzPbtqKraRHkUrYXw6Gk523KXY288JyhoMd0f4rKFQlyhOjAtymIjmfUwKkpdYOt eo1NtWEKHFMtCfzZ2AJ91ggxlIOq0CMgdxjnhh7dllN7uF5B/tYiLrhZusfoei6sV/1+ Q7vvKU/hpnI6i+Guv7wSnNYIq6xmqQDIEVvlsvK/Vr/y1saoqLeCpNznWnZHQiYja6xn w1tg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubVSxT7TpWX97ykS/zd+4BKIbVL9mRbRDinGN2qFi7nPmxBUV/3 iGRDo3OFyDHSguHQEBdxyXxZBaHQ0RzLThgm1mA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIzfmK68FjOL1Sw7XFyQY0CsvLmJFw4kBTVWZ3eOaG/82twwE0AZ70HR1gBFhux3MnqIgZkLL5XCNc2RMqF7KQ= X-Received: by 2002:a02:969a:: with SMTP id w26mr5533752jai.71.1589040151879; Sat, 09 May 2020 09:02:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2432C664-3EEB-41F4-B8D0-B5358189957E@icloud.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::d35; envelope-from=joaotavora@gmail.com; helo=mail-io1-xd35.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -10 X-Spam_score: -1.1 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:249489 Archived-At: t's is On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 4:55 PM =EC=A1=B0=EC=84=B1=EB=B9=88 wrote: > Eli Zaretskii =EC=9E=91=EC=84=B1: > I thought Jo=C3=A3o wrote eglot which is in ELPA for this? Yes, you're correct. This is the goal from the start. > (FWIW I don=E2=80=99t use it personally because I found it didn=E2=80=99t= work with > the servers I use, but when I used it shortly it was pretty great, a > pretty smooth process. I was impressed.) Maybe it works now. Its goal is to work with any server that speaks LSP protocol. > And it=E2=80=99s definitely much better than before, Emacs now works with= a lot of > =E2=80=98modern=E2=80=99 languages. Unfortunately, LSP doesn=E2=80=99t pr= ovide support for syntax > highlighting, but I thought tree-sitter is being worked on for that? Are you sure about this and LSP? I mean tree-sitter is fantastic, but I'm pretty sure LSP has some of this at least outlined: https://github.com/microsoft/language-server-protocol/issues/18 It's bound to be pretty VS Code centric though, but that's another discussion. Having "full" LSP in Emacs would certain give us better arguments to lobby for a less VSCode-centric specification. Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora