[Thanks for the ping. Without it, i would probably not be aware of the message

which was primarily intented for me, since I'm not (at the present) following the

bug tracker list.  Next time, you can add me to the special X-Debbugs-CC: header]

To your patch, I think it is quite acceptable.  I've pushed it to emacs-29.

I'll keep the bug open, since there is also the second problem which I still don't

quite understand, but it looks like a bug, too.  But I think I have enough information

to investigate on my own for now.

João