From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34394: 27.0.50; Emacs segfaults with SLY, company and C-g Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2019 15:37:23 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87va1tye42.fsf@gmail.com> <83wom9o0hu.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2chxpli.fsf@gmail.com> <83k1i9nugh.fsf@gnu.org> <87mun5xko7.fsf@gmail.com> <83h8ddnouf.fsf@gnu.org> <83ftsxnnug.fsf@gnu.org> <87bm3lxgr4.fsf@gmail.com> <83ef8hnm38.fsf@gnu.org> <877ee9xfid.fsf@gmail.com> <83bm3lnkfh.fsf@gnu.org> <8736oxxdsg.fsf@gmail.com> <87va1tvz54.fsf@gmail.com> <87r2chvylb.fsf@gmail.com> <831s4hng19.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="78686"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 34394@debbugs.gnu.org, Andreas Schwab To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 09 16:38:12 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gsUhm-000KKt-V8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 16:38:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46852 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gsUhm-00045B-0E for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 10:38:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34458) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gsUhf-00044u-7r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 10:38:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gsUhe-0001Hy-IO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 10:38:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42158) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gsUhe-0001Hn-EW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 10:38:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gsUhe-0004Ub-8B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 10:38:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2019 15:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34394 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34394-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34394.154972666617248 (code B ref 34394); Sat, 09 Feb 2019 15:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34394) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2019 15:37:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41439 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gsUhM-0004U5-UK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 10:37:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qt1-f169.google.com ([209.85.160.169]:41610) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gsUhK-0004Ts-8O for 34394@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 10:37:42 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-qt1-f169.google.com with SMTP id b15so7356742qto.8 for <34394@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 07:37:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QMqghTYMcEJqmfSg4F48bxcmI3mR8L5NHkSc4/uRFTU=; b=UR3mXDc8tyoIKSuGxiTcJwY4bJ2UEeeW8PSEjAhyNR91zpN/TczY83MksjVYg3JeWP o2CDuPSPrKdsblMcmbT60gIP4F5HYhHWxybhnB4N9U+VK3d+0Lc9X3FEFBql2nSxHles mFyyoJ3cgBa9Xb8yQSL+6k3+IVNE1VydXMepN06EDGseRmlxNmbeGIuep7czT+NJpN7i cHACZT9EPn8nPGJTu0TXg8sDdpVaaU2f2yocolTUfpDbgRr+tSh1uXMgLprS+C43VkW9 orH/EO2c67ULY1bwLCRxq8mf7nxk3Ru9889kECWEcQL6PFS8DbSwowCNOiY4G6VJDvos ml+w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QMqghTYMcEJqmfSg4F48bxcmI3mR8L5NHkSc4/uRFTU=; b=iIFB3YhbsaxpHL9BUnRdhEpOcm4VwC9kszQW56HBmKeCEG2zOJbgTbrvEiu+S+AKlN 1PSPTZa6gj8MPemRrc1kyoK/TXlg01Nx61zJE9/LFNhM5MXBOh5yexyHZQcXUVrulEze nvk2VUTPeHI7Ezo3EZGzFsv7/c9TQ9UAn98bu9FdNdt6gN20G5axeoO8kCsKx+txrvrY u3BHUrD2uZ9iBpTtMJO9t4rWGyN7JPZmWLeDNVz0A7mj403MNEr4nrF8hwFg02A12pzX rEKY9BKAwliOjC1K2lrfF7nnVMcf9ljGEqNA3l/dAQNVFrIWHJyS1xMrm782PHwXKK3V sMCw== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAubqgt1Q6iU5TZCTNnWxyQ6jM/39gJfUc7/S6p7PwYk5Wih1Jynd 2iz5rpZXEaucfkSHYEQPe/Ff0QrkuZydrOgqtKk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IYKnIrPgYfNBC7qnkfsvUBb/XIvnwleO7m3Y6v7u8X2HFhRYHX7wGydShXYzhrT7m476rarsSHktI8/4ZfHXlY= X-Received: by 2002:a0c:d0b6:: with SMTP id z51mr1239060qvg.20.1549726655498; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 07:37:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <831s4hng19.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:155317 Archived-At: On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 3:22 PM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > From: Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora > > Cc: 34394@debbugs.gnu.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org > > Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2019 14:13:52 +0000 > > > > So I disabled SIGINT for gdb and let it go to Emacs for keyboard-quit. > > I reproduced with -nw, here's the backtrace. > > Is it possible that somehow sit_for is called recursively in this > scenario? If you put a breakpoint in sit_for, does it break when bt > shows another instance of sit_for up the call-stack? > > We need to establish who clobbers the jump_buf being used to implement > quitting by C-g. The problem is that if I place a breakpoint there I can't work with company at all. So I can't reproduce the problem. Or maybe I misunderstood. --=20 Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora