From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Code for cond* Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 14:47:25 +0000 Message-ID: References: <874jf3rkzx.fsf@yahoo.com> <87le8ehqew.fsf@localhost> <87zfwurjv4.fsf@yahoo.com> <87cytqhn35.fsf@localhost> <87r0i6rfjg.fsf@yahoo.com> <874jf2hkxo.fsf@localhost> <87frymre9b.fsf@yahoo.com> <871qa6hjtq.fsf@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1812"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Po Lu , Stefan Kangas , rms@gnu.org, acorallo@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, eliz@gnu.org To: Ihor Radchenko Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 24 15:48:18 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rSeY6-0000Do-Ed for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:48:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rSeXg-0000Cw-29; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 09:47:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rSeXW-0000AE-L8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 09:47:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lf1-x133.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::133]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rSeXU-0007QU-TL; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 09:47:42 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-x133.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-5100cb238bcso2213207e87.3; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 06:47:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1706107657; x=1706712457; darn=gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=RtWfLB2elnbbzPIjLmtMZOFEOqG3WI9wmnHZHuS2d9g=; b=G0SSoezBvupeMlGbYP7aSqWJn5B5F1JBzX9FNzu3e3t+piv3Kb6z2bhhMby7aA+RZF fnSQMh13CddtqIPXh5Z7hMFpHzUG30MeO89WOF9CC4QbIMGhPNMqMwCflqVq5LKh647y p1W/wPYykKWIvywe4gLcGMyjEDncVJ1WTSjcl52XV01mSfHQUEuC6ChdU5fYmO8CACRm hEuB+Em7cu4TRPzuy0XGjxGgQkyODHul1rmDuMpJgb9JACsplsCT4OSx4Mlegd0trCJS 75THaPeOLCvXdZ4BtPvqtwQkOYzFyBYzT8ItgvSKf0eWcDzVnIRF98D9d8sEEK/moGUE vkwQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1706107657; x=1706712457; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=RtWfLB2elnbbzPIjLmtMZOFEOqG3WI9wmnHZHuS2d9g=; b=CsI2O5ZnPKqU/lh3Nl/0BQFjJHLX+mbATuGxKFFUqrp7//WCSrCO6de5NnYtEFXdlz TdyVwR8XskDL3HH4NrULONOSCP2IBDGCwHwI3mNVo7TnunXGpPgdMDddLfhf1LBFgWSr TQJAe8E0iGTwBlJRQwMDYrrKWEhQR+/706XiaTv2zqdFQlkmeOU5HoZKyzW904Q0dd7d 9FUPV0BlzIA8z+qKBTK0vnUd6xCEQJAI3kJHziX9O99FaF5ngZ0Ync5IhN4c7NzCQxhA jJcGGzcnD3RNKg93m+X5rNA8XTfy1rFMhtzfCE9fl95VCD7z0D5ietgjI71JB+e+MwZU ks0w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy4bxYhYkCWhektD0ByPFTCKrx51DQRUf2xwYZED1r6PNcwzEZ7 1qJqJXiI5nVPTauTwZbsUon0sZJ4izajMA9iuqYaXGs+mSiOSXzG9Ax6JTSHGQHHD3nw3JnjMuD ay6imzb9/VgoWJAoVPV2mK1jSJrw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE13RbOztCNvy1PVinSu2O15ov7jYxxL1rp/u+oNHYNYUx5pEDeXjMINwWQT4EP+vlPBtu2T7ZCYR6GVT84MgY= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:318d:b0:50f:4ff:6cc5 with SMTP id i13-20020a056512318d00b0050f04ff6cc5mr3943680lfe.130.1706107657350; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 06:47:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <871qa6hjtq.fsf@localhost> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::133; envelope-from=joaotavora@gmail.com; helo=mail-lf1-x133.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:315310 Archived-At: On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 2:41=E2=80=AFPM Ihor Radchenko wrote: > > Po Lu writes: > > > Ihor Radchenko writes: > > > >> FYI, I cannot understand the argument you are making. > > > > It was not addressed specifically to you. My point is that the same > > crowd who were defending cl-lib and pcase as though their life was at > > stake are now pushing for the exclusion of an alternative, which > > everyone can see the irony in. > > I am not sure if pointing this out is constructive. Coming from the same > crowd or not, the useful arguments should be considered. +1. Also, it's incredible how that "irony" doesn't apply to the "crowd" complaining that Elisp is too complex introducing yet another complex way to do much the same. Jo=C3=A3o