From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62606: [PATCH] function to align mode-line elements to right Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2024 10:39:51 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83jzvdijbb.fsf@gnu.org> <86pm4usb45.fsf_-_@mail.linkov.net> <86351m8lqu.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83fryrs1l8.fsf@gnu.org> <87edebjcku.fsf@gmail.com> <835xznro5i.fsf@gnu.org> <831qabrnfh.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2822"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: hugo@heagren.com, 62606@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 21 11:41:19 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rRVGR-0000Sl-A5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 11:41:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRVGC-00009g-62; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 05:41:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRVG7-00009I-4J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 05:41:00 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRVG6-0006d9-LD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 05:40:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rRVG9-0002D5-Uy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 05:41:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2024 10:41:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62606 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 62606-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62606.17058336138428 (code B ref 62606); Sun, 21 Jan 2024 10:41:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62606) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jan 2024 10:40:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36679 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rRVFN-0002Bs-5x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 05:40:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lj1-x22e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::22e]:50393) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rRVFJ-0002Ba-KX for 62606@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 05:40:11 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lj1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2ccb4adbffbso23705291fa.0 for <62606@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 02:40:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1705833600; x=1706438400; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=UXV8Iuf/bn53z4aDa6FfxjakgcgwPxXG1I8xr5aFhQ4=; b=ba/RHxNAAcmsx+KfwejLnNs+K+oXRMTWOk9CyGk9UFDFh5N+VPF2m5b2QP7uBF57di vwrBmyn8CRW8OMCuM+hp1EQBXiG3RCmEaCcCjLFGhBlNTag1CScFAN5rGHiipeb3Trjs oyttVJCsOohuOBYfFOup8pECR3RD6WKUkQjb3xF+MeLxiDGkIAWK/4Rr8aSltzcdwPjZ qQLlCAHvY5RsrwXyCMZVuzuiCWAfK/6gRQ2YuRTz+GvoqIZ4yGVer+fH2AsbekuFNOZN Pp/CAlVwAae166PGUDf/QDEYHPeQ9AI6gD7PKMvU/o/zcBU43rUf0ZTI9qXmBpSjVYRX JhCg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1705833600; x=1706438400; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=UXV8Iuf/bn53z4aDa6FfxjakgcgwPxXG1I8xr5aFhQ4=; b=bQ4KUiGxMi1IidT4Q7c48QwBPNeJsEd46pfixBqUSSBbUYh/2CJHswHDEXMR+dS22Q RP3jrbrBlZAyAsBoFMIxhOjXJtwa8u7f7Pp+VXMI87Af2qe1MTk21Ri7UfW4Ympy2afV 3YrqomsCWRYB6ukGbzZ9SP0W2JwFVWBhNI+CPDPa/JauPo7gWkHM1z4SUvxILWMTcsL5 P2/oje7Y++k2PUGr4UiULFm/Fh4/J2K86vYvyJ9a0TFpvKOIMBk+X9CBWCEvB3NKrgqP H63FL8oPzu/2myavYpJcWulayF5/jYEAMkh9atCFvFq+AdGzdcK7gwrKP7C2QNUCfDKW kUHw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxNfTRH9ybGFV3+sGPpxtxMjHC77WvkPN3VCSO7aHurj4Ep1FD4 RjIBaOLOe0Xdm9GYANMITKOJu3TFdnl9IWSjDMQICT3wx7k/ZmYNLB6MRH9gkiZyxbqMcngjU0Y /qcvIkjriE7c/H1EQnViBmuQbHzotsGHU X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGMIhjJN4ebrxFG4r2GzkP51/9SNtitl5obpbeJjneRX9curXbXLrZEcZcjhy70qpEAOy08C5dTi74KzxSXkoY= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9884:0:b0:2cc:69f5:de89 with SMTP id b4-20020a2e9884000000b002cc69f5de89mr858112ljj.37.1705833600081; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 02:40:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <831qabrnfh.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:278669 Archived-At: On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 10:28=E2=80=AFAM Eli Zaretskii wrote= : > > > From: Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora > > Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2024 10:20:46 +0000 > > Cc: juri@linkov.net, hugo@heagren.com, 62606@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 10:12=E2=80=AFAM Eli Zaretskii w= rote: > > > > > Thanks, but I don't want to expose the tail of the mode-line to Lisp, > > > let alone do it on every iteration through mode-line-format. > > > > Why? > > Because I have more than enough gray hair from debugging and fixing > problems related to this stuff, including the > mode-line-format-right-align itself and the issues it causes. I was > (mildly) against installing this feature, for the same reason, and I > certainly won't agree to let this particular tail to wag the dog any > more than it already has. It's bad enough to have a non-trivial > display feature that is not maintained by anyone; adding more features > to it is really too much. Right. But any technical arguments? What's the difference between solving this in Lisp, which you would accept, and solving this in C+Lisp? It's a two line change like a zillion others just one of the lines happens to be a single assignment in C. I can offer to maintain this feature, or the whole display_mode_element & friends. Any other grey-hair inducing outstanding bugs (apart from this one I've found). Jo=C3=A3o