From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#67150: eglot with typescript language server >= 4.1.0 Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 12:19:15 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87edgt7uyl.fsf@hm.sivalik.com> <87msvh4nbw.fsf@hm.sivalik.com> <87cywd4mlu.fsf@hm.sivalik.com> <83cywctu6u.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38773"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 67150@debbugs.gnu.org, contact@sivalik.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 14 13:21:12 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1r2sPn-0009rw-J3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 13:21:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r2sP0-0008Ct-Gy; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 07:20:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r2sOy-0008CO-7g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 07:20:20 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r2sOx-0005bq-VL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 07:20:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1r2sPe-0008Mi-1U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 07:21:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 12:21:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 67150 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 67150-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B67150.169996441732091 (code B ref 67150); Tue, 14 Nov 2023 12:21:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 67150) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Nov 2023 12:20:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60225 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1r2sOu-0008LX-KG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 07:20:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lf1-x133.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::133]:59495) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1r2sOt-0008LK-Cn for 67150@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 07:20:15 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-x133.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-507cee17b00so7388022e87.2 for <67150@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 04:19:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1699964367; x=1700569167; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Vc10QyR1OjoI4fLm2KK4K/z8KELtdi2pVql8XOSiZvU=; b=VUAPdPBcFvOLcATLA6ib/Rl8APx/1KUcekgkmpd6PCB9ZwmjOaLpK2P7qT++k2PVrj 3ZL9NrI4tJtbUZoY33pp8qUmR86vT3nFl34NA799TteH+lN5TXrjsG06tb69WFRzXTHM acRCfLug+eq42ScqxsV5LHUpTAcW5umTdRdYju/bL+oqJlJ0OETelcA2Lti94mUGyaBV Oh9E9fkBf/zvNPfzU3D4rOftMfHfg71z5s+O5Y1DeDuW4fCk/L07GvZYniyeFY8UzvWg jvf4bnFlTUK3MYNu8LmDgfZg1rrpq6M5FcNS9+Yttmu55VgZuzKUyibjiji6hDkwquvS e5gw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1699964367; x=1700569167; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Vc10QyR1OjoI4fLm2KK4K/z8KELtdi2pVql8XOSiZvU=; b=H5EhOITFTXsfueA1ye8vlcmaEzjc8jrWvsRgJgidPMoPq6e0gUpIc7QK+SUGbgvnQA 61xMLuYs1AeE0o/q6z8xDKXSt1mT5WkPgpbHoKTmd+C3WlJPrC4des0krf1wlOQ+2L+h fHzjvDUCo7Yk47dttt/JSYXs1ZNPXiATQPEa2/1d4/LpIJ6JUvumGWssEMAr7lm1Gh8K Ghu+bOFjicdwtWeKh5H6RHVzfbVBIrJCXyB0BE73S2lktNLIC8WJixYvhPrHs51689Qr 4dLoJJrFbMEFkiCKuHFcjMxhO/TjYbwjivzlLyF+cbiZsuHkXxzI7a6xkTLB0gcPIFIq regg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxrosPv0RIpVUdbsO8X0OOpC6ZQZJm62NfUY7DzSRhW3R3b3gDY wYI5Pot4keIXcL/kalCIpGl1RgXGGX4fLYLR7Qc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGOcozrNbgVB3LsGrebE8DgyGhvMSLGZqbLY+HZyuE5aT1BtXyXYcwtO2+1P/TrVaZG+ukU5QBOGbK8aJ1BFFg= X-Received: by 2002:a19:5e19:0:b0:500:b42f:1830 with SMTP id s25-20020a195e19000000b00500b42f1830mr6361401lfb.63.1699964367074; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 04:19:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83cywctu6u.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:274306 Archived-At: On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 12:07=E2=80=AFPM Eli Zaretskii wrote= : > > > Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org > > From: Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora > > Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 00:12:24 +0000 > > > > Thanks. In the meantime I asked the server author some questions and > > it seems the change has been rolled back, with the server accepting > > the old language-ids again. But I've pushed the change to eglot.el > > anyway. I think this bug can be closed, but let me know if you > > disagree. > > Any reasons not to backport this to the emacs-29 branch? No, go right ahead, though this isn't really a bug, people will probably want to update Eglot from ELPA, and the language server author has reverted the breaking change as well. Anyway I forget the emacs-29 is still a thing. Are bugfixes _always_ to go release branch N-1 if they are applicable there (where N is whatever master is going to become). Was it always so? Jo=C3=A3o