From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#40573: 27.0.90; flymake-mode broken in scratch buffer Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2020 18:50:43 +0100 Message-ID: References: <835ze4lsr1.fsf@gnu.org> <831roslq62.fsf@gnu.org> <83v9m4k4id.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009dc2f105a31b9bb2" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="73473"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 40573@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , Dmitry Gutov To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 12 19:52:18 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jNgmI-000J0K-NK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 19:52:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35668 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jNgmH-0000DY-Mb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 13:52:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51351) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jNgm9-0000DJ-PX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 13:52:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jNgm6-0007BI-GW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 13:52:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47267) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jNgm1-00076r-NI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 13:52:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jNgm1-0006xM-Mm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 13:52:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2020 17:52:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40573 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 40573-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40573.158671386126659 (code B ref 40573); Sun, 12 Apr 2020 17:52:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 40573) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Apr 2020 17:51:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58813 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jNgl3-0006vr-6w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 13:51:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-il1-f177.google.com ([209.85.166.177]:42840) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jNgl1-0006vY-CN for 40573@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 13:50:59 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-il1-f177.google.com with SMTP id f16so6672496ilj.9 for <40573@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 10:50:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Wqe60YDcjtLSFEN2JaztqzYB6vaR/dDjLMuNW9aux34=; b=jrLjJFgyTWmcFuKKU5YTxal4zgalqjcIXTTLsBMP4zFV1PjEefAi5QSFyZ2FlBPga+ iUa3eO4Scies13SLCrHv0iov5ZzUtBS0OHubEmSs3zyEMW/QUW/gzvaYRutAWbLjSPJw bN6DxEprVUZ8FcmMpVr1RTg+WactuycwsSEYYV0Yw09kv31XGy0kURrE+baU8PdGGMxj ZcmBZ/LCd2baJGSSt9L+OdJlJKXvPUoOByfvRiYrdH13ifG/z577GPzEKJadsriFnDqV l41tlQhHzhVGk7Vz8o9iEI1eqSj8kA/JmpkGxZkARXNXLe+KoDT2SdjMRnpXL3x0EA4V Iu7w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Wqe60YDcjtLSFEN2JaztqzYB6vaR/dDjLMuNW9aux34=; b=O2InTmBj5q+Tbs18y5u/LXR0H/25/K8krkEgb5huD5o5/US+oxeNswTSgEsOEgZ5RI MPClwk/pyQ97Kp+N10nVl4O76NhI4UVFCpMQGcbdA/nhYhptPE6Qg5w4QVkjHqL2AwFI +78wGCmUgq5fSEK6uyvCrC8B7dX4syt2gi4d/x88WptCH7lwXwlmQq7bvK9zLV0C/qxv fbNOIypxvajRZwv4klqP5RwJV4+by6MqKVVc+0o8cSfzQPhX0FXfwakqd9UruiXbMqNa VtU66ecAq5+cohamHmKoAFZd+gG4nB3KNaac8e/SBZuzh21u69Y0jFE53sXzSQPYOA1B ETwg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubcKVD1OPs4+aPZqUMfTe/zs5/5P1oTn3XrCtIFrVXiWQHjhh/i K6yEfK6BBJmi2chSsHWDcsrzAyt+4DCriPo/2Uc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLjqz3GrgWBOXq0Sx88ABrEMy3a/GRthztQda5EBb2kFEjhM+p3Pe+dUzsr81h5LWq2ATvML2REDrn89fgiwm0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:6c1:: with SMTP id p1mr14328856ils.137.1586713853803; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 10:50:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83v9m4k4id.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:178271 Archived-At: --0000000000009dc2f105a31b9bb2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 6:17 PM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora > > Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2020 18:02:31 +0100 > > Cc: 40573@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , > > Dmitry Gutov > > > > Why isn't this the right fix? > > > > Because the right fix is not to have the condition at > > the end of emacs-lisp-mode at all, as I explained > > in the previous email. I.e handicapping a mode depending > > on the buffer file name the mode applies to is wrong. IMO. > > So you want to restart all that old dispute from last October? My > opinion didn't change. > I believe I was answering your question. Jo=C3=A3o --0000000000009dc2f105a31b9bb2 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 6:17 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> From: Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora <joaotavora@gmail.com><= br> > Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2020 18:02:31 +0100
> Cc: 40573@d= ebbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>,
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
>
>=C2=A0 Why isn't this the right fix?
>
> Because the right fix is not to have the condition at
> the end of emacs-lisp-mode at all, as I explained
> in the previous email.=C2=A0 I.e handicapping a mode depending
> on the buffer file name the mode applies to is wrong. IMO.

So you want to restart all that old dispute from last October?=C2=A0 My
opinion didn't change.

I believe I = was answering your question.

Jo=C3=A3o
--0000000000009dc2f105a31b9bb2--