From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: eglot-test-diagnostic-tags-unnecessary-code fails with certain clangd versions Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 16:26:14 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87edq7ztks.fsf.ref@yahoo.com> <87y1nzv18a.fsf@gmail.com> <87ilf27tt1.fsf@yahoo.com> <87jzziuzba.fsf@gmail.com> <87pm9a5n14.fsf@yahoo.com> <87bkkuulp5.fsf@gmail.com> <87wn3h4gld.fsf@yahoo.com> <87o7oru7i1.fsf@gmail.com> <87ttyj3i3u.fsf@yahoo.com> <87a6071xxt.fsf@yahoo.com> <87bkknr7io.fsf@gmail.com> <87355zqzbh.fsf@gmail.com> <87pm92pmtn.fsf@gmail.com> <87lejqp7zc.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <87h6uep63a.fsf@gmail.com> <87fs9yqhk4.fsf@gmx.de> <87355yqfsb.fsf@gmx.de> <87y1nqp09x.fsf@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6505"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Robert Pluim , Po Lu , emacs-devel To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 21 17:27:24 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1peepY-0001az-J6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 17:27:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1peeog-0003UO-K3; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 12:26:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1peeoe-0003TX-QZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 12:26:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oa1-x29.google.com ([2001:4860:4864:20::29]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1peeod-0005Sw-8E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 12:26:28 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oa1-x29.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-17671fb717cso16767465fac.8 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 09:26:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1679415986; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=8o8sRrNvdibA/wWR2C8+mtkIKzJ5UBKWEgkaNfkb75g=; b=JLQ3+NZSh5dNsCqNXD7OMluiHcoDqsgVNkw32eEK/ekd/lodMt1dq9izMsA9/rMCmU Iu2fXwjVyeKFzDVfmp7TCI676lJVKXPex2IJ3Y9EZl6A6RTdpdondq60CAJWygd5Gu4B xUTTMm/eZp2fPUlcQXQJ1GTPUQ8knigP7azahjkHcJtPaswsQQDWy/5CLlfHtaOWCRbV +yc3D00O/Q94BrxzDuos84xFaf+n8THbE3ymB4ZOXIh6ER2EBVOhmfWspx2r9+8fEf5J 3oxr5xfvI/s+I/DTCv7U7eJPavc88DvKvDMv2vuDIyzQdg/ePTZo+57TGl4k9lYy0gYj 5mYg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1679415986; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=8o8sRrNvdibA/wWR2C8+mtkIKzJ5UBKWEgkaNfkb75g=; b=pAloEaqM7GGNmv+6fbjmZHFWkLA5zP+IrjHSkBcNmQycV/sIi4Kw9wb/Vo2JzYjMGi C3Dr55Riv+mOrT5c9SwlviQzhr96whrrg/2PGVd9d8/nyi+vb8BOQokfmWwj2zTBWnxX HQE3301jCwqny73l+LeZEhlu9vSzxE+oFfmZgKzIHj3ADAVZ5Jv0F1/ROvAhueE2ABca j4NoL9kcP2qv1WbF0AZ5gybfZ9yTMEYBAWLQBhSU7qHpp7MGyw9CGbyuPCoWSdyWATMh tDGBMB+qpjl8EKINLrTVu0WHCHEpAH5nLqjsDVwd1JJpPbLrGAn7Qtc/S3vrWbO8rR8r Tdgw== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKX9vzpQGtnmney44/dU3koowfAY1MSdm8jZdq1IhWV4o+Y2Fr+2 kLKt3etCX3eXO/2QB+7lIepkOSn0Xky5agrKfO0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+pkUcSZcQNML4fzmC9ftoQxDDrnGWINyMy1FNMkCa176syXuwCkBLpNqB7THkf+RnfktRjrJXCfeDfyU/jqXA= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6871:4d15:b0:17a:df9b:6b1b with SMTP id ug21-20020a0568714d1500b0017adf9b6b1bmr893093oab.5.1679415985976; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 09:26:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87y1nqp09x.fsf@gmx.de> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:4860:4864:20::29; envelope-from=joaotavora@gmail.com; helo=mail-oa1-x29.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:304669 Archived-At: On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 3:55=E2=80=AFPM Michael Albinus wrote: > > Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora writes: > > Hi Jo=C3=A3o, > > >> Even the recent upgrade from Debian stretch to Debian bullseye on EMBA > >> has caused trouble, see for example bug#62210 or bug#62211. > > > > I'm not suggesting a full system upgrade. > > Perhaps we can move eglot-tests to a different (Debian) environment, say > in the platform-images and platforms stages, or so. Don't know, I'm just > thinking randomly :-) I don't understand the EMBA structure at all. I thought it would be basically "make check", but there are all kinds of subjobs/stages/pipelines forming a CI/CD model I'm not familiar with. I can't really figure out what is passing as it should or failing as it shouldn't. I don't think the test should be marked unstable, as it is not really that: it's pretty stable. So let's install Robert's upcoming patch (using version<=3D and a helper) and considering upgrading clangd soon via one of those methods. It's not very useful to have a version of clangd in EMBA that doesn't represent very well what people are using. Jo=C3=A3o