From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Quang Kien Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MPS: Win64 testers? Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 16:44:09 -0700 Message-ID: References: <86h6bxq3p3.fsf@gnu.org> <86sevho61y.fsf@gnu.org> <86ed70o90k.fsf@gnu.org> <86le17murx.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12807"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, pipcet@protonmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 09 07:14:59 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1scHxq-0003EU-EO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2024 07:14:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1scHx7-0003Fp-7M; Fri, 09 Aug 2024 01:14:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1scCny-0001e0-Hx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2024 19:44:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ej1-x62f.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::62f]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1scCnx-0001Kv-3W; Thu, 08 Aug 2024 19:44:26 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a7aada2358fso404995666b.0; Thu, 08 Aug 2024 16:44:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1723160661; x=1723765461; darn=gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=NkP9NU/3om7Vfg7z11cxfsswPTXHiDS4GN+58nWmPX8=; b=AWL3BVZ6fMYWDAXLnWV/Racsn9wSjttOWZp0vaCdegF6RuKQCYHM8LqiBG0P6XiBI7 xlMXFt6zendz2peX7CfxRsePus494Kf9kP8xk6MTXt5ffh+0TR/j1cO2PBNn55D/4maJ xLDSOG/vqdSZBEGGHOLg3p9DRPyvWGrXtK95NqSmTZ7B/4PE8C3GtpbVB/ip2CAxf3XZ ROi440JLE90kMf29sMqqmknDacQsY751GxsF88sSc9i0YexVzzY0C9huSeKCrUY2pPCm Xd1uZkw0AnFGoY4cdpt1IePhBLu7FhcLykHr5SeZZQz4cJH8cjIw32iaYh1HYI7i+A6R 6TxA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1723160661; x=1723765461; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=NkP9NU/3om7Vfg7z11cxfsswPTXHiDS4GN+58nWmPX8=; b=TiGb9QzpwrzShrOhO33zBNK5dL2lPvHgdK2XhXl86wD54U0IaemB0efJ8aQRhz254k pf+8hF76i8vEbFQzLr7GPVQc08dhQ4JwQ0JfreU4nZ3W/vBLCoZx1XfI7e4z63UKIv/k 7iwq9iqtDbV0ZwOupBa2UVSrPnWUSToQP/0ta8SyFH94E+FNqg/IVaj1hZwpknkv2ZQH 8bJcDIiOeq/PkSA0P50aU5DbZj+6zcMRyhbCpf004x7uWGlgspMJqGTDA0r4FutU4H1d rkACr5Qq1ep5VYJ31y25Q7YwlznJUXSUIGiT0OJyq+fwuYVqkr4n3hDOqQ7jr79392AK FHmg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz7d0scfZOeA2tWzwIUYJ2FCa0D4zRBnUufa3SdGrsgtuqMdERj WkZdSu86Xd1e2V5zQ0+EvLC+5ANaycgtWfdo0QbRjW8zQh+A/47tbsxVL3m38gl2w71lLaVhKWC eE8S7MRTN5mHfxHVY/L8GzTIqZxBax46c X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEKmOsIAj9VY60I3B44Vk5YQ0YWYdqhO6D2hLGrw7xy2xIcLhcfEBRlWHPe/4QYQ02xU3mdRp1hzl+iaV4Y/yM= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:368c:b0:a7a:8dcd:ffb4 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a8091f1998dmr275449366b.17.1723160661364; Thu, 08 Aug 2024 16:44:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86le17murx.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::62f; envelope-from=kien.n.quang@gmail.com; helo=mail-ej1-x62f.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 09 Aug 2024 01:14:11 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:322545 Archived-At: > What ProcExp64 shows is a good sign, but I'd prefer to test also some > redirection like above, with Emacs and the sub-process both writing to > the same stdout/stderr stream, which would allow to verify positively > that they write to different places. Okay, I have tested with this lisp exp: (print 10 #'external-debugging-output) 10 is printed in the stdout/stderr on the console. Then try again with (start-process-shell-command "test" nil "emacs -Q --batch --eval \"(print 123123 #'external-debugging-output)\"") The child emacs process is spinned up but nothing is spewed to the current console output. Does that correct and prove that they don't share the handle? ---- Kien