From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Matthew Persico Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37390: 26.3; ediff-buffers appears to have a focus issue Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 08:19:15 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1ddaf25a-e1c8-4fd2-1350-6ca8e33f31cb@gmx.at> <68193418-d3e6-fca2-4b86-d6d117768584@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003fb27f0592bebbf7" Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="92889"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 37390@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 17 14:23:41 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iACWC-000O3u-9V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 14:23:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45494 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iACWB-0004dn-7D for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 08:23:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34573) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iACSh-0002Iu-Si for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 08:20:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iACSg-00047z-F7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 08:20:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42949) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iACSg-00047t-90 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 08:20:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iACSf-0005c5-Vs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 08:20:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Matthew Persico Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:20:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37390 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 37390-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37390.156872277421537 (code B ref 37390); Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:20:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37390) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Sep 2019 12:19:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51770 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iACSD-0005bJ-Or for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 08:19:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-vs1-f42.google.com ([209.85.217.42]:45689) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iACSC-0005b3-BN for 37390@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 08:19:32 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-vs1-f42.google.com with SMTP id d204so1852984vsc.12 for <37390@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 05:19:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=z7ztMUBpeCBiTZ61jUjD/b+22o0OW8I8uSD5geRNx1E=; b=iLH0H073REluQhiWOgGL8yxp5RmaKwQL3x5N8b0mLoCwbAwzuvXWbP2H8p+fs/6PS9 0CqSGuEjuJOmszQPOANCJ3FI+BuaPkI2w5AEPrwZ9+NakQHJLO+fYytmIXngRx/7gDKU eQlxL4XZ5JQXEnWqFYbuuGz6zk8/h+NNS8Unk0H//wFbAG84GKYA2W5OpfpU7eQXNaA/ +eSUrkSzxgrhWU/ExAN/sZ2NktcbNnxNjyrkYr9uMVh90OZMP+oX5EJCU3mLd8NnzTBw TLPY8Y9lU/oL1PcBoeEg31FfXvTRCz8B/78P1gdrlb2Zb3PlRdgwx/raNjNJNa2REbrf ahuQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=z7ztMUBpeCBiTZ61jUjD/b+22o0OW8I8uSD5geRNx1E=; b=HaqqcsChmVxodQaLaVFxBAc5Fsnyo8JWbKloYKuittvBHDN/UDrK4OQWqez/aoCmFZ VAVdEk9l3tpSKPlxgNeegXFV+JwvbpiJLakF67BGdd3VP0jVUFOqFCChKUOROBgTAENF WCBvDtaldr9m5XY4JVMya7Sk0xNpvgvzhwP1Iuxq0HTfYpXxXx2reePZwnzRYk3fprq9 0D1AAv1d1kTBQOVV1NAvS+K/lBuwxkdMJ8sjKlQ9dz/rfq+CLJWLzzjNxs57rJKPcYgl lfkpyGuaeqx5NiOZ/xTXEthsZQxEfmDmUIYr00Ph/5xIlLuxG4p9YXthOQ801vqr0PF+ 2d6g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVBwakIVgzTZ/6lVgERDu0IrD4tTEOlidJCCgkBttFD2ems8vJ1 kbPiqzeJq5d3tZVxoB+h9mkAsOehQ7EbDbuyejY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx5AIBbZJRAvcHhdyFI1jPkwOUvfO4F2wzB5cfunbPMFVNc6QfJAYjNa5Fl5tllSZFQBWOT8J/0zkjBPoYbzPQ= X-Received: by 2002:a67:7087:: with SMTP id l129mr1629605vsc.83.1568722766507; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 05:19:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:166635 Archived-At: --0000000000003fb27f0592bebbf7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Split window horizontally? Oh man I have to try that! On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 4:56 AM martin rudalics wrote: > > For YEARS I've been using a separate frame for control. I'll just toggle > > that off. No issues with that in 26.2. I will try in 26.3. And now that > I > > see it, why the heck would you want a separate frame? To have multiple > > diffs going at the same time? > > 'ediff-window-setup-function' has a misguided default value. Luckily > you can change it - the speedbar, for example, doesn't allow to do > that. I'm using 'ediff-setup-windows-plain' ever since together with > 'ediff-split-window-function' set to 'split-window-horizontally'. > > martin > -- Matthew O. Persico --0000000000003fb27f0592bebbf7 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Split window horizontally? Oh man I have to try that= !

On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 4:56 AM martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at> wrote:
=C2=A0> For YEARS I've been using a separate fra= me for control. I'll just toggle
=C2=A0> that off. No issues with that in 26.2. I will try in 26.3. And n= ow that I
=C2=A0> see it, why the heck would you want a separate frame? To have mu= ltiple
=C2=A0> diffs going at the same time?

'ediff-window-setup-function' has a misguided default value.=C2=A0 = Luckily
you can change it - the speedbar, for example, doesn't allow to do
that.=C2=A0 I'm using 'ediff-setup-windows-plain' ever since to= gether with
'ediff-split-window-function' set to 'split-window-horizontally= '.

martin
--
Matthew O. Persico
--0000000000003fb27f0592bebbf7--