From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Ola Nilsson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28605: 26.0.60; Part of leftmost character hidden Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 15:11:50 +0200 Message-ID: References: <59CE05F2.1010202@gmx.at> <59CE8E74.5010308@gmx.at> <59D35549.6030905@gmx.at> <87wp4c750c.fsf@gmail.com> <59D4A45F.5010606@gmx.at> <87tvzfjfcp.fsf@gmail.com> <59D5E8F6.8080002@gmx.at> <87efqikk0x.fsf@gmail.com> <87a815lq3w.fsf@gmail.com> <59D73C6F.3020907@gmx.at> <87o9pk65ae.fsf@gmail.com> <59D74E49.2000605@gmx.at> <87a8145wcr.fsf@gmail.com> <59DCCA92.8090501@gmx.at> <59DDD72B.3040003@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1507727563 23233 195.159.176.226 (11 Oct 2017 13:12:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 13:12:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Robert Pluim , Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , 28605@debbugs.gnu.org, Kaushal To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 11 15:12:31 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e2GoD-0003gl-Ua for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 15:12:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41006 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e2GoG-0006d6-3Y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 09:12:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51974) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e2Gnu-0006UO-Ry for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 09:12:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e2Gnq-0005jK-23 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 09:12:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:52727) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e2Gnp-0005jF-Uh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 09:12:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e2Gnp-0004uP-Pa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 09:12:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ola Nilsson Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 13:12:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28605 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 28605-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28605.150772752018859 (code B ref 28605); Wed, 11 Oct 2017 13:12:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28605) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Oct 2017 13:12:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33175 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e2Gnn-0004u7-UG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 09:12:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-f53.google.com ([209.85.218.53]:43723) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e2Gnl-0004tq-Dq for 28605@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 09:11:57 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-f53.google.com with SMTP id c77so2908641oig.0 for <28605@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 06:11:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=lUsXWHT+GibTbjVhNQrXCBFApSfd6KclMVfgZv7qqo0=; b=Hh/hraRBKTzTp6MHXAxJZse+mb9qP3L28nUwpdd/KYDDN2Oap4d4tCPRLwi2zBbASb I39XETz0skVJGKoa0lckaVHFMKDTv6guNto1Ci+wDAZiZaXqlXxRyniJeeCaIENSAowm G+7Cs4+/yWnHQbZp4JqFqhTK17xjkRxoqF/OzSoOWHVaHmUZL06FUGP38ugEgCIJenXV qlP7Ad63NRnG60fdWHygoDMBPSVj2XII+89R/FlLBtGjzvG73/epOl88o3L1mDtThUvc p6iu0r2olXFNtJR2cQkN4ivyFO+HoXuNBNwnL5rTOeXaB+wihNjuypFGaOOS9YB6Wf9/ juKQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lUsXWHT+GibTbjVhNQrXCBFApSfd6KclMVfgZv7qqo0=; b=Zvj2uIDlds4+vTbQ01QLyov7FombFnxZ1D1M71k5uoXMJNEgYkwU7Qkcple1KAlpks YonujB3WCbLbGjZN+ep2/u43RqUMwnrYFp1t5aA4qT6Htq4sqonjfP2KeNQalPSbgmkO sl9q6e+g4okzyuGiXxHPh9gvlBAtElF4DdUuI8nybuEDd+wRvh+0W7jF/YU1FdMmV9nI JEFJhEG6q3L6YiClSynF/ItYkZSygPhKlWmkXvN6b0OKNuxUChtxYa8qO4iwb/gRX7cc sned4giZvWqUlWCK0C0VzB7jCPLOJ0A7KKFKwKzEYLel2htrz9Lw2Ihd6leoVjO4GBer 66WQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaVPpdzbDzwKqxcJAHVLFWf+wUD2jG19FtgStoutkLTPpgIGBOc0 qzbd2c7ujXoIgW4Nrn05nCgvFT6XDNtZ7w53u+0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QD0nQEwk1AEcpzEchHIDRNBhB+D4WKZkd3itWDeuFv2vBRnBqriHj3eKOmMmZOHVtZr1NbuEUYVi8mIuoFZMjs= X-Received: by 10.157.65.207 with SMTP id v15mr3675404oti.452.1507727511700; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 06:11:51 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.168.167.199 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 06:11:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <59DDD72B.3040003@gmx.at> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:138220 Archived-At: On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 10:32 AM, martin rudalics wrote: >>>> The area where the scroll bars "meet" is currently blank which looks >>>> weird but I'm not sure it's related. >>> >>> Do you see the same effect with scaling turned off? >> >> Yes. > > Hmm... What did you want to see there instead? I'm not sure. It just looks like something is missing when there is a white square there instead of some scroll bar theme color. >>>> The frame is still resized to have fewer lines each time I turn >>>> vertical scroll bars on or off. >>> >>> Does it happen without scaling? >> >> No. >> When scaling is off the frame is enlarged to make room for the scroll >> bar, and then shrunk back again when the scroll bar is disabled. > > So with scaling on, shrinking the frame is essentially the right thing > to do and is also done correctly at the monent scroll bars are disabled. > But the frame fails to enlarge appropriately at the moment scroll bars > are enabled. Is that interpretation correct? I see the same behaviour as Robert. -- Ola Nilsson