Re: Hide extraneous buffers?

[Aaron Meurer <asmeurer@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1212 bytes --]

There are literally dozens of packages that manage buffers. If you Google
around, you're sure to find one that fits your needs. It sounds like you
just want to create a custom next-buffer that skips those buffers you don't
want.

Aaron Meurer

On Friday, May 18, 2012, BDB wrote:

> Mark Skilbeck wrote:
> > How exactly are you cycling through the buffers? If you know the names of
> > the buffers, simply using C-x b with a partial-string can complete the
> buffer
> > name for you. If you don't know the names of the buffers you're
> interested in,
> > you're still going ot require casting an eye on the buffer list. Really,
> > what's 3 extra buffer names?
>
> I like to use next-buffer bound to a key to cycle through the open buffers.
> I googled around and found buffer-stack.el, which kind of minimizes the
> problem by keeping the less recently used buffers at the bottom of the
> stack,
> however it's still annoying to have the clutter around.  It's actually
> pretty
> surprising nobody has made a fix for this.
>
> > P.S. If you're not, you should probably be using IDO[1].
>
> Thanks, but I'm not looking to change my behavior to fit emacs, but the
> other way around :)
>


-- 
Sent from my iPad.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1493 bytes --]