* bug#73857: [PATCH] * lisp/progmodes/eglot.el: add support for insertReplaceEdit
@ 2024-10-18 0:54 Casey Banner
2024-10-18 5:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Casey Banner @ 2024-10-18 0:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 73857
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2320 bytes --]
Since 3.16, LSP supports the capability `insertReplaceSupport`. This
allows textEdit to be an `InsertReplaceEdit` see:
(
https://microsoft.github.io/language-server-protocol/specifications/lsp/3.17/specification/#insertReplaceEdit
)
This patch adds support for this capability, and uses the `replace`
field of the `InsertReplaceEdit`. Original functionality (ie.
`TextEdit`) is preserved.
The benefits of this were originally discussed here:
https://github.com/joaotavora/eglot/discussions/1456, but this is a summary:
Consider this file:
```
const Foo = struct {
correct_name: u32,
};
fn example(foo: Foo) u32 {
return foo.correct_name;
}
```
1. Place the cursor on 6:22 (the _ in correct_name)
2. Backspace once to delete the t
3. Receive the following LSP message: `<-- textDocument/completion[20]
{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":20,"result":{"isIncomplete":false,"items":[{"label":"correct_name","kind":5,"detail":"u32","documentation":{"kind":"plaintext","value":""},"sortText":"2_correct_name","textEdit":{"range":{"start":{"line":5,"character":15},"end":{"line":5,"character":21}},"newText":"correct_name"}}]}}`
4. Accept the completion
5. The buffer now contains ` return foo.correct_name_name;` on line 6
I expected it to replace the entire token, resulting in ` return
foo.correct_name;`.
Indeed with this patch applied (and an LSP that supports the
capability), the behaviour I expected is now what happens.
This is the first real elisp that I've written besides configuration, so
I'm not sure if this is the correct way, but it seems to work for me.
Patch is attached.
Thanks!
Casey
In GNU Emacs 30.0.91 (build 1, x86_64-w64-mingw32) of 2024-10-17 built
on DESKTOP-EK25TL1
Repository revision: 50620e96d763bd21854a95c580b572687eebc319
Repository branch: eglot_insert_replace_edit
Windowing system distributor 'Microsoft Corp.', version 10.0.19045
System Description: Microsoft Windows 10 Pro (v10.0.2009.19045.5011)
Configured using:
'configure -prefix=/e/dev/emacs-src --without-dbus --without-pop
--with-native-compilation --with-xml2 --with-wide-int
--without-compress-install 'CFLAGS=-O2 -mtune=native -march=native
-fomit-frame-pointer -ftree-vectorize'
PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/mingw64/lib/pkgconfig:/mingw64/share/pkgconfig'
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3009 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-lisp-progmodes-eglot.el-add-support-for-insertReplac.patch --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 3939 bytes --]
From bbf79f95636d699ccf9ba7028e6c3dce23af2378 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: kcbanner <kcbanner@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 00:43:32 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] * lisp/progmodes/eglot.el: add support for insertReplaceEdit
---
lisp/progmodes/eglot.el | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lisp/progmodes/eglot.el b/lisp/progmodes/eglot.el
index 0a14146a245..8285506928f 100644
--- a/lisp/progmodes/eglot.el
+++ b/lisp/progmodes/eglot.el
@@ -647,6 +647,7 @@ eglot--uri-path-allowed-chars
(:detail :deprecated :children))
(TextDocumentEdit (:textDocument :edits) ())
(TextEdit (:range :newText))
+ (InsertReplaceEdit (:newText :insert :replace))
(VersionedTextDocumentIdentifier (:uri :version) ())
(WorkDoneProgress (:kind) (:title :message :percentage :cancellable))
(WorkspaceEdit () (:changes :documentChanges))
@@ -959,7 +960,8 @@ eglot-client-capabilities
["documentation"
"details"
"additionalTextEdits"])
- :tagSupport (:valueSet [1]))
+ :tagSupport (:valueSet [1])
+ :insertReplaceSupport t)
:contextSupport t)
:hover (list :dynamicRegistration :json-false
:contentFormat (eglot--accepted-formats))
@@ -3368,12 +3370,19 @@ eglot-completion-at-point
;; state, _not_ the current "foo.bar".
(delete-region orig-pos (point))
(insert (substring bounds-string (- orig-pos (car bounds))))
- (eglot--dbind ((TextEdit) range newText) textEdit
- (pcase-let ((`(,beg . ,end)
+ (eglot--dcase textEdit
+ (((TextEdit) range newText)
+ (pcase-let ((`(,beg . ,end)
(eglot-range-region range)))
(delete-region beg end)
(goto-char beg)
- (funcall (or snippet-fn #'insert) newText))))
+ (funcall (or snippet-fn #'insert) newText)))
+ (((InsertReplaceEdit) newText replace)
+ (pcase-let ((`(,beg . ,end)
+ (eglot-range-region replace)))
+ (delete-region beg end)
+ (goto-char beg)
+ (funcall (or snippet-fn #'insert) newText)))))
(snippet-fn
;; A snippet should be inserted, but using plain
;; `insertText'. This requires us to delete the
@@ -3602,8 +3611,12 @@ eglot--apply-text-edits
(replace-buffer-contents temp)))
(when reporter
(eglot--reporter-update reporter (cl-incf done))))))))
- (mapcar (eglot--lambda ((TextEdit) range newText)
- (cons newText (eglot-range-region range 'markers)))
+ (mapcar (lambda (text-edit-or-insert-replace-edit)
+ (eglot--dcase text-edit-or-insert-replace-edit
+ (((TextEdit) range newText)
+ (cons newText (eglot-range-region range 'markers)))
+ (((InsertReplaceEdit) newText replace)
+ (cons newText (eglot-range-region replace 'markers)))))
(reverse edits)))
(undo-amalgamate-change-group change-group)
(when reporter
--
2.46.0.windows.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* bug#73857: [PATCH] * lisp/progmodes/eglot.el: add support for insertReplaceEdit
2024-10-18 0:54 bug#73857: [PATCH] * lisp/progmodes/eglot.el: add support for insertReplaceEdit Casey Banner
@ 2024-10-18 5:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-11-02 11:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2024-10-18 5:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Casey Banner, João Távora; +Cc: 73857
> From: Casey Banner <kcbanner@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 20:54:38 -0400
>
> Since 3.16, LSP supports the capability `insertReplaceSupport`. This
> allows textEdit to be an `InsertReplaceEdit` see:
> (https://microsoft.github.io/language-server-protocol/specifications/lsp/3.17/specification/#insertReplaceEdit)
>
> This patch adds support for this capability, and uses the `replace`
> field of the `InsertReplaceEdit`. Original functionality (ie.
> `TextEdit`) is preserved.
>
> The benefits of this were originally discussed here:
> https://github.com/joaotavora/eglot/discussions/1456, but this is a summary:
>
> Consider this file:
>
> ```
> const Foo = struct {
> correct_name: u32,
> };
>
> fn example(foo: Foo) u32 {
> return foo.correct_name;
> }
> ```
>
> 1. Place the cursor on 6:22 (the _ in correct_name)
> 2. Backspace once to delete the t
> 3. Receive the following LSP message: `<-- textDocument/completion[20] {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":20,"result":
> {"isIncomplete":false,"items":[{"label":"correct_name","kind":5,"detail":"u32","documentation":
> {"kind":"plaintext","value":""},"sortText":"2_correct_name","textEdit":{"range":{"start":
> {"line":5,"character":15},"end":{"line":5,"character":21}},"newText":"correct_name"}}]}}`
> 4. Accept the completion
> 5. The buffer now contains ` return foo.correct_name_name;` on line 6
>
> I expected it to replace the entire token, resulting in ` return foo.correct_name;`.
>
> Indeed with this patch applied (and an LSP that supports the
> capability), the behaviour I expected is now what happens.
>
> This is the first real elisp that I've written besides configuration, so
> I'm not sure if this is the correct way, but it seems to work for me.
>
> Patch is attached.
Thanks.
João, any comments?
> From bbf79f95636d699ccf9ba7028e6c3dce23af2378 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: kcbanner <kcbanner@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 00:43:32 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] * lisp/progmodes/eglot.el: add support for insertReplaceEdit
>
> ---
> lisp/progmodes/eglot.el | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lisp/progmodes/eglot.el b/lisp/progmodes/eglot.el
> index 0a14146a245..8285506928f 100644
> --- a/lisp/progmodes/eglot.el
> +++ b/lisp/progmodes/eglot.el
> @@ -647,6 +647,7 @@ eglot--uri-path-allowed-chars
> (:detail :deprecated :children))
> (TextDocumentEdit (:textDocument :edits) ())
> (TextEdit (:range :newText))
> + (InsertReplaceEdit (:newText :insert :replace))
> (VersionedTextDocumentIdentifier (:uri :version) ())
> (WorkDoneProgress (:kind) (:title :message :percentage :cancellable))
> (WorkspaceEdit () (:changes :documentChanges))
> @@ -959,7 +960,8 @@ eglot-client-capabilities
> ["documentation"
> "details"
> "additionalTextEdits"])
> - :tagSupport (:valueSet [1]))
> + :tagSupport (:valueSet [1])
> + :insertReplaceSupport t)
> :contextSupport t)
> :hover (list :dynamicRegistration :json-false
> :contentFormat (eglot--accepted-formats))
> @@ -3368,12 +3370,19 @@ eglot-completion-at-point
> ;; state, _not_ the current "foo.bar".
> (delete-region orig-pos (point))
> (insert (substring bounds-string (- orig-pos (car bounds))))
> - (eglot--dbind ((TextEdit) range newText) textEdit
> - (pcase-let ((`(,beg . ,end)
> + (eglot--dcase textEdit
> + (((TextEdit) range newText)
> + (pcase-let ((`(,beg . ,end)
> (eglot-range-region range)))
> (delete-region beg end)
> (goto-char beg)
> - (funcall (or snippet-fn #'insert) newText))))
> + (funcall (or snippet-fn #'insert) newText)))
> + (((InsertReplaceEdit) newText replace)
> + (pcase-let ((`(,beg . ,end)
> + (eglot-range-region replace)))
> + (delete-region beg end)
> + (goto-char beg)
> + (funcall (or snippet-fn #'insert) newText)))))
> (snippet-fn
> ;; A snippet should be inserted, but using plain
> ;; `insertText'. This requires us to delete the
> @@ -3602,8 +3611,12 @@ eglot--apply-text-edits
> (replace-buffer-contents temp)))
> (when reporter
> (eglot--reporter-update reporter (cl-incf done))))))))
> - (mapcar (eglot--lambda ((TextEdit) range newText)
> - (cons newText (eglot-range-region range 'markers)))
> + (mapcar (lambda (text-edit-or-insert-replace-edit)
> + (eglot--dcase text-edit-or-insert-replace-edit
> + (((TextEdit) range newText)
> + (cons newText (eglot-range-region range 'markers)))
> + (((InsertReplaceEdit) newText replace)
> + (cons newText (eglot-range-region replace 'markers)))))
> (reverse edits)))
> (undo-amalgamate-change-group change-group)
> (when reporter
> --
> 2.46.0.windows.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* bug#73857: [PATCH] * lisp/progmodes/eglot.el: add support for insertReplaceEdit
2024-10-18 5:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2024-11-02 11:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-11-02 13:22 ` João Távora
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2024-11-02 11:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: joaotavora; +Cc: kcbanner, 73857
Ping! João, any comments to the patch or the issue in general?
> Cc: 73857@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 08:56:32 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
>
> > From: Casey Banner <kcbanner@gmail.com>
> > Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 20:54:38 -0400
> >
> > Since 3.16, LSP supports the capability `insertReplaceSupport`. This
> > allows textEdit to be an `InsertReplaceEdit` see:
> > (https://microsoft.github.io/language-server-protocol/specifications/lsp/3.17/specification/#insertReplaceEdit)
> >
> > This patch adds support for this capability, and uses the `replace`
> > field of the `InsertReplaceEdit`. Original functionality (ie.
> > `TextEdit`) is preserved.
> >
> > The benefits of this were originally discussed here:
> > https://github.com/joaotavora/eglot/discussions/1456, but this is a summary:
> >
> > Consider this file:
> >
> > ```
> > const Foo = struct {
> > correct_name: u32,
> > };
> >
> > fn example(foo: Foo) u32 {
> > return foo.correct_name;
> > }
> > ```
> >
> > 1. Place the cursor on 6:22 (the _ in correct_name)
> > 2. Backspace once to delete the t
> > 3. Receive the following LSP message: `<-- textDocument/completion[20] {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":20,"result":
> > {"isIncomplete":false,"items":[{"label":"correct_name","kind":5,"detail":"u32","documentation":
> > {"kind":"plaintext","value":""},"sortText":"2_correct_name","textEdit":{"range":{"start":
> > {"line":5,"character":15},"end":{"line":5,"character":21}},"newText":"correct_name"}}]}}`
> > 4. Accept the completion
> > 5. The buffer now contains ` return foo.correct_name_name;` on line 6
> >
> > I expected it to replace the entire token, resulting in ` return foo.correct_name;`.
> >
> > Indeed with this patch applied (and an LSP that supports the
> > capability), the behaviour I expected is now what happens.
> >
> > This is the first real elisp that I've written besides configuration, so
> > I'm not sure if this is the correct way, but it seems to work for me.
> >
> > Patch is attached.
>
> Thanks.
>
> João, any comments?
>
> > From bbf79f95636d699ccf9ba7028e6c3dce23af2378 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: kcbanner <kcbanner@gmail.com>
> > Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 00:43:32 -0400
> > Subject: [PATCH] * lisp/progmodes/eglot.el: add support for insertReplaceEdit
> >
> > ---
> > lisp/progmodes/eglot.el | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lisp/progmodes/eglot.el b/lisp/progmodes/eglot.el
> > index 0a14146a245..8285506928f 100644
> > --- a/lisp/progmodes/eglot.el
> > +++ b/lisp/progmodes/eglot.el
> > @@ -647,6 +647,7 @@ eglot--uri-path-allowed-chars
> > (:detail :deprecated :children))
> > (TextDocumentEdit (:textDocument :edits) ())
> > (TextEdit (:range :newText))
> > + (InsertReplaceEdit (:newText :insert :replace))
> > (VersionedTextDocumentIdentifier (:uri :version) ())
> > (WorkDoneProgress (:kind) (:title :message :percentage :cancellable))
> > (WorkspaceEdit () (:changes :documentChanges))
> > @@ -959,7 +960,8 @@ eglot-client-capabilities
> > ["documentation"
> > "details"
> > "additionalTextEdits"])
> > - :tagSupport (:valueSet [1]))
> > + :tagSupport (:valueSet [1])
> > + :insertReplaceSupport t)
> > :contextSupport t)
> > :hover (list :dynamicRegistration :json-false
> > :contentFormat (eglot--accepted-formats))
> > @@ -3368,12 +3370,19 @@ eglot-completion-at-point
> > ;; state, _not_ the current "foo.bar".
> > (delete-region orig-pos (point))
> > (insert (substring bounds-string (- orig-pos (car bounds))))
> > - (eglot--dbind ((TextEdit) range newText) textEdit
> > - (pcase-let ((`(,beg . ,end)
> > + (eglot--dcase textEdit
> > + (((TextEdit) range newText)
> > + (pcase-let ((`(,beg . ,end)
> > (eglot-range-region range)))
> > (delete-region beg end)
> > (goto-char beg)
> > - (funcall (or snippet-fn #'insert) newText))))
> > + (funcall (or snippet-fn #'insert) newText)))
> > + (((InsertReplaceEdit) newText replace)
> > + (pcase-let ((`(,beg . ,end)
> > + (eglot-range-region replace)))
> > + (delete-region beg end)
> > + (goto-char beg)
> > + (funcall (or snippet-fn #'insert) newText)))))
> > (snippet-fn
> > ;; A snippet should be inserted, but using plain
> > ;; `insertText'. This requires us to delete the
> > @@ -3602,8 +3611,12 @@ eglot--apply-text-edits
> > (replace-buffer-contents temp)))
> > (when reporter
> > (eglot--reporter-update reporter (cl-incf done))))))))
> > - (mapcar (eglot--lambda ((TextEdit) range newText)
> > - (cons newText (eglot-range-region range 'markers)))
> > + (mapcar (lambda (text-edit-or-insert-replace-edit)
> > + (eglot--dcase text-edit-or-insert-replace-edit
> > + (((TextEdit) range newText)
> > + (cons newText (eglot-range-region range 'markers)))
> > + (((InsertReplaceEdit) newText replace)
> > + (cons newText (eglot-range-region replace 'markers)))))
> > (reverse edits)))
> > (undo-amalgamate-change-group change-group)
> > (when reporter
> > --
> > 2.46.0.windows.1
> >
>
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* bug#73857: [PATCH] * lisp/progmodes/eglot.el: add support for insertReplaceEdit
2024-11-02 11:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2024-11-02 13:22 ` João Távora
2024-11-04 0:24 ` Dmitry Gutov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: João Távora @ 2024-11-02 13:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eli Zaretskii, Dmitry Gutov; +Cc: kcbanner, 73857
First, the patch looks good. I haven't been able to test it, but it
looks good, very good even.
The issue seems to be valid, and I've confirmed it, but I don't
fully understand it. Here, I find it somewhat dissatisfying that
what would seem to be a client-side issue (i.e. a bug in Eglot) should
be "fixed" by adding a feature so as to somehow circumvent the
problem.
But another possible explanation is that the issue is not a bug in Eglot
but a bug in certain servers (such as rust-analyzer) which given
the reasonable/common absence of a capability in the client (the one
that's being proposed by Casey) utilizes Eglot's current capabilities
in a suboptimal way that triggers a problem.
In that case -- which would have to be confirmed -- fixing the server
or adding the capability to the client are two equally valid alternatives
to solve this. We seem to have the latter in the patch.
When I find the time I will try to test this patch, unless someone
beats me to it with a convincing test (even better a convincing
automated test in eglot-tests.el). Such a person could be
Dmitry, who has worked on Eglot completion logic before. I've
added him to CC.
João
On Sat, Nov 2, 2024 at 11:56 AM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Ping! João, any comments to the patch or the issue in general?
>
> > Cc: 73857@debbugs.gnu.org
> > Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 08:56:32 +0300
> > From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> >
> > > From: Casey Banner <kcbanner@gmail.com>
> > > Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 20:54:38 -0400
> > >
> > > Since 3.16, LSP supports the capability `insertReplaceSupport`. This
> > > allows textEdit to be an `InsertReplaceEdit` see:
> > > (https://microsoft.github.io/language-server-protocol/specifications/lsp/3.17/specification/#insertReplaceEdit)
> > >
> > > This patch adds support for this capability, and uses the `replace`
> > > field of the `InsertReplaceEdit`. Original functionality (ie.
> > > `TextEdit`) is preserved.
> > >
> > > The benefits of this were originally discussed here:
> > > https://github.com/joaotavora/eglot/discussions/1456, but this is a summary:
> > >
> > > Consider this file:
> > >
> > > ```
> > > const Foo = struct {
> > > correct_name: u32,
> > > };
> > >
> > > fn example(foo: Foo) u32 {
> > > return foo.correct_name;
> > > }
> > > ```
> > >
> > > 1. Place the cursor on 6:22 (the _ in correct_name)
> > > 2. Backspace once to delete the t
> > > 3. Receive the following LSP message: `<-- textDocument/completion[20] {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":20,"result":
> > > {"isIncomplete":false,"items":[{"label":"correct_name","kind":5,"detail":"u32","documentation":
> > > {"kind":"plaintext","value":""},"sortText":"2_correct_name","textEdit":{"range":{"start":
> > > {"line":5,"character":15},"end":{"line":5,"character":21}},"newText":"correct_name"}}]}}`
> > > 4. Accept the completion
> > > 5. The buffer now contains ` return foo.correct_name_name;` on line 6
> > >
> > > I expected it to replace the entire token, resulting in ` return foo.correct_name;`.
> > >
> > > Indeed with this patch applied (and an LSP that supports the
> > > capability), the behaviour I expected is now what happens.
> > >
> > > This is the first real elisp that I've written besides configuration, so
> > > I'm not sure if this is the correct way, but it seems to work for me.
> > >
> > > Patch is attached.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > João, any comments?
> >
> > > From bbf79f95636d699ccf9ba7028e6c3dce23af2378 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: kcbanner <kcbanner@gmail.com>
> > > Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 00:43:32 -0400
> > > Subject: [PATCH] * lisp/progmodes/eglot.el: add support for insertReplaceEdit
> > >
> > > ---
> > > lisp/progmodes/eglot.el | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------
> > > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/lisp/progmodes/eglot.el b/lisp/progmodes/eglot.el
> > > index 0a14146a245..8285506928f 100644
> > > --- a/lisp/progmodes/eglot.el
> > > +++ b/lisp/progmodes/eglot.el
> > > @@ -647,6 +647,7 @@ eglot--uri-path-allowed-chars
> > > (:detail :deprecated :children))
> > > (TextDocumentEdit (:textDocument :edits) ())
> > > (TextEdit (:range :newText))
> > > + (InsertReplaceEdit (:newText :insert :replace))
> > > (VersionedTextDocumentIdentifier (:uri :version) ())
> > > (WorkDoneProgress (:kind) (:title :message :percentage :cancellable))
> > > (WorkspaceEdit () (:changes :documentChanges))
> > > @@ -959,7 +960,8 @@ eglot-client-capabilities
> > > ["documentation"
> > > "details"
> > > "additionalTextEdits"])
> > > - :tagSupport (:valueSet [1]))
> > > + :tagSupport (:valueSet [1])
> > > + :insertReplaceSupport t)
> > > :contextSupport t)
> > > :hover (list :dynamicRegistration :json-false
> > > :contentFormat (eglot--accepted-formats))
> > > @@ -3368,12 +3370,19 @@ eglot-completion-at-point
> > > ;; state, _not_ the current "foo.bar".
> > > (delete-region orig-pos (point))
> > > (insert (substring bounds-string (- orig-pos (car bounds))))
> > > - (eglot--dbind ((TextEdit) range newText) textEdit
> > > - (pcase-let ((`(,beg . ,end)
> > > + (eglot--dcase textEdit
> > > + (((TextEdit) range newText)
> > > + (pcase-let ((`(,beg . ,end)
> > > (eglot-range-region range)))
> > > (delete-region beg end)
> > > (goto-char beg)
> > > - (funcall (or snippet-fn #'insert) newText))))
> > > + (funcall (or snippet-fn #'insert) newText)))
> > > + (((InsertReplaceEdit) newText replace)
> > > + (pcase-let ((`(,beg . ,end)
> > > + (eglot-range-region replace)))
> > > + (delete-region beg end)
> > > + (goto-char beg)
> > > + (funcall (or snippet-fn #'insert) newText)))))
> > > (snippet-fn
> > > ;; A snippet should be inserted, but using plain
> > > ;; `insertText'. This requires us to delete the
> > > @@ -3602,8 +3611,12 @@ eglot--apply-text-edits
> > > (replace-buffer-contents temp)))
> > > (when reporter
> > > (eglot--reporter-update reporter (cl-incf done))))))))
> > > - (mapcar (eglot--lambda ((TextEdit) range newText)
> > > - (cons newText (eglot-range-region range 'markers)))
> > > + (mapcar (lambda (text-edit-or-insert-replace-edit)
> > > + (eglot--dcase text-edit-or-insert-replace-edit
> > > + (((TextEdit) range newText)
> > > + (cons newText (eglot-range-region range 'markers)))
> > > + (((InsertReplaceEdit) newText replace)
> > > + (cons newText (eglot-range-region replace 'markers)))))
> > > (reverse edits)))
> > > (undo-amalgamate-change-group change-group)
> > > (when reporter
> > > --
> > > 2.46.0.windows.1
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
--
João Távora
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* bug#73857: [PATCH] * lisp/progmodes/eglot.el: add support for insertReplaceEdit
2024-11-02 13:22 ` João Távora
@ 2024-11-04 0:24 ` Dmitry Gutov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Gutov @ 2024-11-04 0:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: João Távora, Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: kcbanner, 73857
Hi!
On 02/11/2024 15:22, João Távora wrote:
> First, the patch looks good. I haven't been able to test it, but it
> looks good, very good even.
>
> The issue seems to be valid, and I've confirmed it, but I don't
> fully understand it. Here, I find it somewhat dissatisfying that
> what would seem to be a client-side issue (i.e. a bug in Eglot) should
> be "fixed" by adding a feature so as to somehow circumvent the
> problem.
>
> But another possible explanation is that the issue is not a bug in Eglot
> but a bug in certain servers (such as rust-analyzer) which given
> the reasonable/common absence of a capability in the client (the one
> that's being proposed by Casey) utilizes Eglot's current capabilities
> in a suboptimal way that triggers a problem.
>
> In that case -- which would have to be confirmed -- fixing the server
> or adding the capability to the client are two equally valid alternatives
> to solve this. We seem to have the latter in the patch.
>
> When I find the time I will try to test this patch, unless someone
> beats me to it with a convincing test (even better a convincing
> automated test in eglot-tests.el). Such a person could be
> Dmitry, who has worked on Eglot completion logic before. I've
> added him to CC.
I agree that such a change should come with automated test(s). Happy to
provide pointers, or look at writing that myself in a little while.
Speaking of client-side issue, it might as well be. Or it is possible
that our original expectations were wrong, and the protocol expected the
suffix to never be replaced using the original convention. Now the next
extension allows us to ask the servers to do that instead.
Regarding capabilities, though, it seems the editors that support the
extension, so far, all include the ability to configure which of the
behaviors (insert or replace) will be used, with a way to invoke the
non-default behavior using a combination like Shift+Enter.
Is that something we want? Or, to put it differently, are we sure that
the "insert" behavior won't be preferred at least in some contexts (only
determined by the user)?
The protocol doc says this:
* Most editors support two different operations when accepting a
completion
* item. One is to insert a completion text and the other is to replace an
* existing text with a completion text. Since this can usually not be
* predetermined by a server it can report both ranges.
Examples of configurability:
* VS Code:
https://github.com/microsoft/language-server-protocol/issues/1260#issuecomment-833014788
(link to a video in a comment)
* Sublime: https://github.com/sublimelsp/LSP/pull/1809
* [dbaeumer about Eclipse]:
https://github.com/microsoft/language-server-protocol/issues/1260#issuecomment-836775280
I'm not sure which method should be used in our completion UI to say
"flip default this time", but maybe a user option would help.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-11-04 0:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-10-18 0:54 bug#73857: [PATCH] * lisp/progmodes/eglot.el: add support for insertReplaceEdit Casey Banner
2024-10-18 5:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-11-02 11:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-11-02 13:22 ` João Távora
2024-11-04 0:24 ` Dmitry Gutov
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.