From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: nitish chandra Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25150: Possible reason for this bug Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 01:38:10 +0530 Message-ID: References: <86r35gamai.fsf@sungevity.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c05a8303f26a30543cc2245 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1481919857 9048 195.159.176.226 (16 Dec 2016 20:24:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 20:24:17 +0000 (UTC) To: 25150@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 16 21:24:13 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cHz35-0001Tm-5W for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 21:24:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34182 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cHz39-0004IG-FG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 15:24:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55174) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cHz30-00044w-9y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 15:24:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cHz2w-0008Gv-Cs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 15:24:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57400) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cHz2w-0008Gk-8s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 15:24:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cHz2w-0001zh-3Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 15:24:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <86r35gamai.fsf@sungevity.com> Resent-From: nitish chandra Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 20:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25150 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25150-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25150.14819197997612 (code B ref 25150); Fri, 16 Dec 2016 20:24:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25150) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Dec 2016 20:23:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44566 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cHz2F-0001yi-0X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 15:23:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qk0-f179.google.com ([209.85.220.179]:33441) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cHyo0-0001cV-8v for 25150@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 15:08:36 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-qk0-f179.google.com with SMTP id t184so48120050qkd.0 for <25150@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 12:08:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=kHZKJo5eg4yAiEg+NMWlTKZCUD5VnPa1ThWwEBmRMZ8=; b=S9TG8rP1p+zFDPaICoswME4413nUfBt1sYfL00ekowlvXsAU8oCq614fW8KVFE+KXx U0Ff7uK1c6p6SAzeErLqZeAWO+aZt1bOHy6TZIZaZNALQ72BQbHOa9w4nmGdleX9y5tA hicAvcF0VI6/yYYLyhKGB8ABsv461X9FH5FmPalL1Uy2EUAIcbcJvY/RsTXYsIvIPTsN 4Pbws8v1ec1oGWZxyC84BXslXhbo+6k2lZ7BzhrJgbwl4DtHSdvxY745auHYhCFag+3j WKEc6ZvnDLE/C+XK1T6bg0zEeq22EGyhOv9/ZtTKINp4nQ7DiNovSzqKqsOrdR0vo1ho FdgA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=kHZKJo5eg4yAiEg+NMWlTKZCUD5VnPa1ThWwEBmRMZ8=; b=CS+hT+v06J37GEGBZvpw4QppUuALqT5RJWOrxuZ+O37DD1NVvcR/TdJZk2tZHwAU3i TDw8oBcShH9SfBAc++Rdweisksj0niVUYWgCdjFfq8/HWLl0tLQXpc4kpyzpxp5LBkgA kfVC9jXWNa2Ob+Xhw6aQWl4A4+qAa8yErPl6PB1V/k4a6/nQNa5U4ZsmDVNDfQ1mqIS/ nzcp4Bh5clTkvyypiKFD9jYvxusfEje5GUBc8vopHKxdWRB5HaJTk67jkV9IdLuTm1iF q9zQK1RPTtjJgkFr+XwddcWSJFyRxZBArmVKEwxb+ES+ZMkQgzYGyw77x8N5c1OJMtHD u5fA== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJD3wZ1HXPN1ElTJClsg1EqgOWnAvG3vO+hYV4wdMvVfMEdjmX3k8+qK6jM2G97TcdCATAZ0Hwdb8505w== X-Received: by 10.55.113.69 with SMTP id m66mr2639246qkc.186.1481918910502; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 12:08:30 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.237.40.66 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 12:08:10 -0800 (PST) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 15:23:17 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:127095 Archived-At: --94eb2c05a8303f26a30543cc2245 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Message mode registers message--syntax-propertize as syntax-propertize-function. This function is used by FontLock mode to highlight the buffer. message--syntax-properties assigns comment-begin class to the ] on the second line. Because of this, it is ignored in the motion traversal. But why is this? Why should ] at the start of a line be regarded as a comment? If > is regarded as a comment, it sounds reasonable because > characters are used to cite messages. But why ]? Are there any citing formats that use ] for citing? Thanks, Nitish --94eb2c05a8303f26a30543cc2245 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message mode registers message--syntax= -propertize as syntax-propertize-function. This function is used by FontLoc= k mode to highlight the buffer.

message--syntax-properties as= signs comment-begin class to the ] on the second line. Because of this, it = is ignored in the motion traversal.

But why is this? Why shoul= d ] at the start of a line be regarded as a comment? If > is regarded as= a comment, it sounds reasonable because > characters are used to cite m= essages. But why ]? Are there any citing formats that use ] for citing?
=
Thanks,
Nitish
--94eb2c05a8303f26a30543cc2245--