From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Yates Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: enabling company-capf support in cfengine.el Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 12:01:52 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87fvqtg02v.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87r497fu0h.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87haa1litl.fsf@yandex.ru> <87y53czx7e.fsf@yandex.ru> <87bo08bivm.fsf_-_@flea.lifelogs.com> <87sitkzahs.fsf@yandex.ru> <52D7DAAB.2070709@yandex.ru> <52D81960.2080408@yandex.ru> <52DA8C17.4080707@yandex.ru> <52DC00E5.3020803@yandex.ru> <52DC6A26.3020003@yandex.ru> <87k3dv9z85.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87k3dv1g69.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87wqhusp3o.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bfd05fc2a236104f069d960 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1390237327 20778 80.91.229.3 (20 Jan 2014 17:02:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 17:02:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 20 18:02:15 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W5IEn-0006cN-CW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 18:02:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53690 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5IEm-0006Yc-5U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 12:02:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37598) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5IEa-0006NL-La for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 12:02:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5IEZ-000839-Ep for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 12:02:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wg0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::22c]:35025) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5IET-00081z-J5; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 12:01:53 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id l18so6990527wgh.11 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 09:01:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=s/ZPY5JhnN5SoQC8TL+Xi/9F/mBbSJI/g+3E8f4Ebro=; b=ootPbN4ZDZaLipWfoHAweLw/b+hEXpghScfDqbZnTZqekOfUP5nVm/+bdP85JRemQO 0JqQbqTaoQkp4q7SrVVAY1iwFoqkODdgshwu8Nn0tN7H5hmzVGQXkC+59W1v24TgMOL1 s3/JN1XbuSmmGUJt+rsLN6+cYHXQJMw0HODqKR1sjlPi2S09L9G6G0Uie+4/uCphBLYv 5yiKAgTTSTPXjVzigoA8KtvfSe0BLvcO8zoxW59cqsmpdhORF5tRmExo8DagtGhCl3kc 6kDCqPCAKtjiRYojdhoWVhOrWeUOobxZ+fBBRH18ysC2AwqzCZ5E6LOExiZUpEB3Z9R5 buwA== X-Received: by 10.194.77.7 with SMTP id o7mr15093229wjw.35.1390237312490; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 09:01:52 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.194.48.110 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 09:01:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87wqhusp3o.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: EGZS1RCGET8o7Xg4UFu_kc3h1HY X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c00::22c X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:168791 Archived-At: --047d7bfd05fc2a236104f069d960 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:30 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > John Yates writes: > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 10:32 PM, =D3scar Fuentes wrot= e: > >> dragonegg is GPLed. > > Meaning it is above reproach. > > Not really. "reproach" is something concerning intent rather than > execution. Point well taken. I should have said "entirely legal". And just for the record, given awareness of the gcc project's goals and philosophy (something I am sure the dragonegg developers possess) I acknowledge that dragonegg is clearly a questionable undertaking. /john --047d7bfd05fc2a236104f069d960 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable --047d7bfd05fc2a236104f069d960--