From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Yates Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Your commit 7409a79 Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 13:54:04 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83h9x917il.fsf@gnu.org> <85k324h0hg.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83k324yv44.fsf@gnu.org> <85tx17dqzy.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83y4qixhq8.fsf@gnu.org> <83egsaxbwy.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01183f625ab5f40509b8f32a X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1418064947 15231 80.91.229.3 (8 Dec 2014 18:55:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 18:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stephen Leake , Emacs developers To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 08 19:55:40 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xy3T8-0003vf-Bu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 19:55:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35555 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xy3T7-0000lf-Oh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 13:55:37 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57026) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xy3ST-0000dg-FK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 13:55:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xy3Rw-0004UP-Cq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 13:54:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-yh0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c01::236]:53338) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xy3Rd-0004F6-Hp; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 13:54:05 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-yh0-f54.google.com with SMTP id 29so2798766yhl.27 for ; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 10:54:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=musi87Zdrxy7jrBVy7t+/fVHLzwi7DwsMAoSDkQSRDY=; b=nCwCC63yAsHulM5isbTKSgyd3CFEh349tqUlJZWZxNmCWtyGo6iFwdF39VSkEX7gIE 5woUkjMeWLcM4FFZznb/kaC1wowdZ+9GT4IAFiSha3AQ6xdbT9Yvnp/y7+gFL1RnsnqT cVIeSAY1F+gpE/3OiGyyFJZ9T3W8UKxj1t81eSEjDdRL0PhmC3nTPaWttfbr1yGIk9sa hDnoOWGNgK/VPXESihZ8SoDChk7EoPsyeU5UVANM3VKm5rGUtdLuv+//dbCAUnmUfptg tKcpF2K/1RY5MhaNwbP7yTFPXHJqmC/qTapSq947K+LMFJVK+8irF5XJG+OsLHLczUVy 3kFw== X-Received: by 10.236.41.201 with SMTP id h49mr14617371yhb.182.1418064844991; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 10:54:04 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.170.224.5 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 10:54:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83egsaxbwy.fsf@gnu.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: Ewq7ROxJiiWFQOqd3NJNfksrJ0Q X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4002:c01::236 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:179444 Archived-At: --089e01183f625ab5f40509b8f32a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Not sure what your point is here. My comment above was in teh context > of a request to use full sentences as summary lines. Is that a > "failure to practice git subject line hygiene"? If so, in what ways? > My apologies for being obtuse. Perhaps as a git user for some while I assumed more familiarity with git culture than exists in this thread. I was merely pointing out that across many important projects there are rather stringent standards for the subject line of a git commit. These cover line length, no trailing period, imperative mood, etc. So actually Eli I was supporting your stance of resisting "lowering the barriers". /john --089e01183f625ab5f40509b8f32a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On M= on, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:<= br>
Not sure what your point is here.=C2=A0 M= y comment above was in teh context
of a request to use full sentences as summary lines.=C2=A0 Is that a
"failure to practice git subject line hygiene"?=C2=A0 If so, in w= hat ways?

My apologies for being obtuse= .=C2=A0 Perhaps as a git user for some while
I assumed more famil= iarity with git culture than exists in this thread.

I was merely pointing out that across many important projects there
=
are rather stringent standards for the subject line of a git commit.
These cover line length, no trailing period, imperative mood, etc.=

So actually Eli I was supporting your stance of r= esisting "lowering
the barriers".

<= div>/john

--089e01183f625ab5f40509b8f32a--