Hi Glenn,

Thanks for the quick reply.

On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> wrote:

> >      ("dash" . sh-mode)
>
> Sounds good.
>

That's the one that really matters to me as many (most?) of my scripts have
no file extension.

I've never come across .bsh and .dsh used as extensions in this way.
> I find zero examples on two random RHEL6, Debian testing machines.
> The only .bsh files are LibreOffice components that are not bash scripts.
> So this seems like something for your personal .emacs.
>

I guess I suggested .bsh and .dsh for completeness.  My first encounter
with .bsh was on my newest job.  I introduced .dsh once I started using a
#!/bin/dash shebang.  Given that you found a LibreOffice conflict I am
happy to withdraw my suggestion.

/john