From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: John Yates <john@yates-sheets.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: etags failing with structure members
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:42:23 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJnXXogxTyPLzBD7vm3LhWOSSpmFE+TAcU7XtyNodxVzTT_vmA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <58C25BCF.4010704@gmx.at> <831su5fpx7.fsf@gnu.org>
	<58C3D124.1070501@gmx.at> <834lz0dpjp.fsf@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1489246984 9143 195.159.176.226 (11 Mar 2017 15:43:04 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 15:43:04 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>, Emacs developers <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 11 16:42:59 2017
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17])
	by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1cmjAY-0001hY-6w
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 16:42:58 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43807 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1cmjAc-0003Tm-O0
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:43:02 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36991)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <john.yates.sheets@gmail.com>) id 1cmjA5-0003Te-22
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:42:30 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <john.yates.sheets@gmail.com>) id 1cmjA4-0008R9-B7
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:42:29 -0500
Original-Received: from mail-lf0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::232]:32876)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <john.yates.sheets@gmail.com>)
	id 1cmjA2-0008OS-OC; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:42:26 -0500
Original-Received: by mail-lf0-x232.google.com with SMTP id a6so50595820lfa.0;
	Sat, 11 Mar 2017 07:42:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
	h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
	:subject:to:cc;
	bh=sxF0nJX/jp2ZC+lHXUPu95SgneoQCKA+8OYqi4eBPCg=;
	b=B2hdaH/FRoYmPbiuKdH9bOIiKIOlqlG8U5G6nO/PMKFevm4W44t9tws6Ep9WeLUNba
	Y8wnXvcXTJudMmQtHD/bgZevbUywxhARrCEpzYOmEtA77v/TS+b8m69lOCbmEjWdK/7u
	yAEzMKA4tqc18glMdsYBPHarMc71q94b2xfan6RJle6pW0V8Ib4h8ww+Mjm6k5AObC1Z
	Rwy81tuZqduUH5OT2NU75gFe8b5AALSJ5UEvg56Zlb1YbGwgaUFaufZh3MX6kv0d4ldV
	RdD5Ul5VPs6FLIoPHNAtbgKcnaPIL+XOCUwC51XRVhEHdZCM1hnVJf7VEf6TytF4UPz1
	SeCg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
	:date:message-id:subject:to:cc;
	bh=sxF0nJX/jp2ZC+lHXUPu95SgneoQCKA+8OYqi4eBPCg=;
	b=RjIuAf60Xnluqf6rEr8KRrULr4Dgc7ZSelfO930NhHX/u2/YHm90vJOFIWeqsxnkFr
	L0Va6GfMDRwRdyCB3b8C8knZnC+4fdq9wkT/o6eyJSo/uPBZBQ+qN2g1Mvkid6HE0buz
	hIaOA6gi3P86nzgHAL85FbqnTCA2spLvRE+10z+8HKvH65ifuctQNe7WXB5H6OasmDES
	tBil3Nrjv+dK2nRjI6KK8YIZS8a4D0ir55Z/CjooOFcKH1r9srNxn77QW5ztvt51/+Rl
	Xz93rkFxfCLO7W8DNBe9a+GNzv6UFxvIoaPjXGkkL+lYokRPoppO2bCjaup4OYYEBYUf
	5tzg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mtqSO21xNupB3l7fd2FtI9Fra+kqs27OgilpLezqbaGaxKQigTcCemSKp4QDPEnYD8E3GBIJt6rAV6QQ==
X-Received: by 10.46.7.1 with SMTP id 1mr7994041ljh.21.1489246943720; Sat, 11
	Mar 2017 07:42:23 -0800 (PST)
Original-Received: by 10.25.209.8 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 07:42:23 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <834lz0dpjp.fsf@gnu.org>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: FJhyEV1SLtk2SSMIVZWiLHsbdD0
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c07::232
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:212907
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/212907>

On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> They look like a beginning of a K&R style function definition:

For many contemporary codebases support for K&R is only a liability.
Might it be possible to drop such support (at least optionally)?

/john