From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Yates Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New key binding syntax Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 18:46:12 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20211004081724.6281.11798@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87lf2mwl68.fsf@posteo.net> <874k99f8ev.fsf@gnus.org> <87sfwtrttu.fsf@posteo.net> <87mtn1cdbh.fsf@gnus.org> <87o87hrte4.fsf@posteo.net> <878rylccyi.fsf@gnus.org> <87fssssz57.fsf@posteo.net> <87v91oc49k.fsf@gnus.org> <877de2a746.fsf@gnus.org> <87lf2d5obc.fsf@gnus.org> <87ee82r8p0.fsf@gnus.org> <87v91dnsxg.fsf@gnus.org> <87czngmfbc.fsf@gmail.com> <87cznfvod7.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16936"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Robert Pluim , Richard Stallman , Emacs developers To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 04 23:47:48 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1milWN-0004Es-Cs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 23:47:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59082 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1milWL-0004Hi-JS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 18:47:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48606) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1milV5-0003b1-Nk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 18:46:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-f44.google.com ([209.85.208.44]:45986) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1milV3-00070d-Pj; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 18:46:27 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-f44.google.com with SMTP id f4so26389036edx.12; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 15:46:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kvfFWKkcgP8w6+bblu+e3aNsGOe4QY4d7Ge1ZMtrOMc=; b=m9Bc3zCl6nLF5DeMNtGIMGTajBRrG75K46kvk/xMvDxqmLH23ka//pXEO6TzSKZItU Dde4j75w07j67VmcGBOsIZ9f/GGD18BjoL8zXykjsFU60OCu1d6+qe550gTOgpp2a2xU 2SYcj7C+o7E6j47XS/wEft3TefcpLVIqNtj+5GvU9zWjfVH4/tqG2cj2Gs8AjMibDo/l +oqnw4NpME4dm21fZqB5Lpyj/FioYkz8PbgMkBb5/EEoupXm8nvxqPssgH47jAqX4nE5 DOQW547io7SEjd+uK1NWKQo28PYIhTSye5gRv/sCRP5JSlhq+gg4EbQGzIoFtoDW+Zvo wJbg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530jOuSFgotTjdTrKeHGP7yCY1HefdtgDUGpBiwYAp+EAR92yPA1 5PYpzk+77ilU1ZPtMCnQlBBi9j+7ogJRTK2FB2c= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyUpzVtewryaphANp8YbdEqjirpCGf28U1HYz4Xtpw8pRJ3ukOr0iAF2dGiRzbUQdvrCwaKvFO9KRZf/7jvlV0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:50ce:: with SMTP id h14mr34769678edb.228.1636065983299; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 15:46:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87cznfvod7.fsf@gnus.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.208.44; envelope-from=john.yates.sheets@gmail.com; helo=mail-ed1-f44.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:278720 Archived-At: On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 1:10 PM Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Robert Pluim writes: > > In this case, John is asking: "Does this mean that there must be one > > and only one space character separating the key strokes?" > If that's what he's asking, the answer is "yes". Lars, Are you describing the behavior of the existing code or are you articulating a design stance. If the latter, would you please explain? (I shared my motivation for desiring a more permissive syntax in my original email.) /john