From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Peter Vasil Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14860: [Peter Vasil] emacs 24.3.50.1: Byte compile warning Warning: function used to take 0+ arguments, now takes 0 Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 20:28:05 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1373826553 17979 80.91.229.3 (14 Jul 2013 18:29:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 18:29:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 14860@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 14 20:29:12 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UyR2k-0006ch-IU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 20:29:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53356 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UyR2k-0003kZ-6V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 14:29:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60340) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UyR2f-0003kP-5l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 14:29:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UyR2c-0000fi-LP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 14:29:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59852) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UyR2c-0000fd-J4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 14:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UyR2c-0003kA-5P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 14:29:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Peter Vasil Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 18:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14860 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.137382650514323 (code B ref -1); Sun, 14 Jul 2013 18:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jul 2013 18:28:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54168 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UyR20-0003iw-Vs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 14:28:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58511) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UyR1y-0003ie-Kq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 14:28:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UyR1p-0000Z4-Fv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 14:28:17 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:52678) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UyR1p-0000Z0-Ca for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 14:28:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60204) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UyR1m-0003iB-Ak for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 14:28:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UyR1k-0000YH-09 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 14:28:10 -0400 Original-Received: from serv32.loswebos.de ([213.187.93.131]:49731) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UyR1j-0000XE-Q6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 14:28:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com (mail-wg0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by serv32.loswebos.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E8D01994A6B for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 20:27:12 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id f11so9491469wgh.15 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 11:28:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=a0II0DCfpIdfq18SNYyteHLaurm2Vowcta5v+nx3dIo=; b=Q+BNVIWUb1iCn5KLYHFOk1g0+djGKARmnHh/kYP2LBhsFPYmKwZGQRVJpjbXGChNgz dv7wZY7ziCrW37ViiFq9VaTfTIR7Yf3jPEKB6kxnl4wnhD21mjVZVd75IiDoFvUoozsb KHbU60IChdGlctNuCtzLjbcV/690zH2v3npjSjRW0n2rwN02xi0rHgkkxkoqGAjsHlwy FQonUlT6GZEUUkP/vvUOj/q4+VXRUkyUpFkrugrcouT3T+hvs3AhWCFmzjcqV7FRe2tw K1ZQW5EdGN+3SiT9006wYDHuZnZp4hTO25pSoSCJ55mmsfT9v2akt7dxfooQQqi7m9u1 04Gw== X-Received: by 10.180.78.39 with SMTP id y7mr6830725wiw.4.1373826485310; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 11:28:05 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.216.22.132 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 11:28:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:76353 Archived-At: I had the advice only because I adviced the regular goto-line to call hs-show-block and when I added the got-line-with-feedback I just copied the first advice and did not realize that it makes no sense. I have removed the advice now and I've put the hs-show-block into got-line-with-feedback function. Sorry for the noise. Peter On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> Indeed, I have an advice on that function >> (defadvice goto-line-with-feedback >> (after >> expand-after-goto-line-with-feedback >> activate compile) >> "hideshow-expand affected block when using >> goto-line-with-feedback in a collapsed buffer" >> (save-excursion >> (hs-show-block))) > > Than it's a known issue. I do wonder, tho: why on earth do you have an > advice on your hand-written function? > > > Stefan