From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Wales Subject: Re: [RFC] Moving "manual.org" into core Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 14:00:38 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87bmhooaj9.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87tvveqi7u.fsf@bzg.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35605) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ee5gR-00065t-Jh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 16:00:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ee5gR-0004fb-20 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 16:00:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87tvveqi7u.fsf@bzg.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Bastien Guerry Cc: Achim Gratz , Org Mode List , Nicolas Goaziou i will leave style decisions to the bike shed manufacturer [those who do the work]. but i will opine anyway. i'm with the no indentation people. [except -- not implemented -- plain lists indented by 2. :]] but my reason for posting is that as a default for org, i think (setq org-src-preserve-indentation t) would surprise users less. and to congratulate for dogfooding. :]