From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Wales Subject: Re: Properties ID vs. CUSTOM_ID Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 10:10:45 -0700 Message-ID: References: <2016-08-25T14-36-57@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <877fb429j4.fsf@saiph.selenimh> <2016-08-25T17-05-15@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <87mvg2t8g0.fsf@artlab.createcnix.lan> <2016-12-12T12-38-45@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <2016-12-12T15-59-38@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <2016-12-18T13-12-13@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <2016-12-20T20-43-27@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <2016-12-22T11-00-17@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <2016-12-22T16-27-34@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38257) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cK6tD-0002sJ-Tn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 12:10:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cK6tD-0001uS-6G for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 12:10:47 -0500 Received: from mail-ua0-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c08::231]:32983) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cK6tD-0001u6-0z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 12:10:47 -0500 Received: by mail-ua0-x231.google.com with SMTP id y22so54856888uay.0 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 09:10:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2016-12-22T16-27-34@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Karl Voit Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 12/22/16, Karl Voit wrote: > However, the argument was that no human should set :ID: but use > :CUSTOM_ID: *instead*. See also the old thread I linked before. i don't recall anybody arguing, claiming, or implying specifically that. if you're careful, and do not need custom id features, then you're probably ok ignoring custom id. sounds like you want reassurance that you're ok?