From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Clemente Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#71289: 30.0.50; cmcheckmagic aborts when tty_write_glyphs writes "Garbage collecting..." in some cases Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 16:51:19 +0000 Message-ID: References: <86bk4lq1lq.fsf@gnu.org> <86o78iko7q.fsf@gnu.org> <86h6eakmpn.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7578"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 71289@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 03 18:54:21 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sEAwv-0001pD-AP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2024 18:54:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sEAwR-0005pI-6G; Mon, 03 Jun 2024 12:53:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sEAwQ-0005p2-21 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2024 12:53:50 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sEAwP-0005hJ-Os for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2024 12:53:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sEAwc-0003ZR-C8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2024 12:54:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Daniel Clemente Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2024 16:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 71289 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 71289-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B71289.171743359113591 (code B ref 71289); Mon, 03 Jun 2024 16:54:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 71289) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jun 2024 16:53:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49579 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sEAvm-0003X7-NU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2024 12:53:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-vk1-f177.google.com ([209.85.221.177]:59416) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sEAvk-0003Wj-IB for 71289@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2024 12:53:09 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-vk1-f177.google.com with SMTP id 71dfb90a1353d-4df550a4d4fso1208000e0c.2 for <71289@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 03 Jun 2024 09:52:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1717433510; x=1718038310; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WHaM6BpUK0kTzOdAUKjPWLO48O/Vda7bPPGafH3IwHY=; b=j0aDwQ12BTtd7zkrdr6z3o891aTBBQZfmbA1sv4QF/jhkqIGwy3VDxi6SgAO0VhPDn 02wRM+r36650ZbJtDxYI+tj0lTkpYFDIB6aLp9DWEIZH+nDxRalJwyvtZkCkkHSMN2SR QMqUkzcaHzoqSTlES0bsRje+5lxMiCUj48p6PdpoB10I9W5rDFunY884MsCiQM1cyK36 r/J3TvhxbSBgPzqD5K9K+4ouaGciEULlSKdrgOw7i+GqH2PbOfHTYkG7CLF12H3PyZWk SnXSZlwOF1Obx4YKPCIByWMnTa6+EZh/lI8HFvaFAWFz1zIWsbaAPJY9Z00IfiEF0qpZ yxKQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1717433510; x=1718038310; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=WHaM6BpUK0kTzOdAUKjPWLO48O/Vda7bPPGafH3IwHY=; b=DISMcJ7JYYYlFnmv1jzOM4y/O1cnFavXS+YGhxsXT/OZmDQOh9/jdHYDaricGLkI8m QIjBsh7ntK9kfBhYEf4QAfYU0+OUzzB53+cvC/56x8GtXWiJC5RIxL0MHoaeDtpOaew8 JeRyFKodnW9c244cbGJaw1icDTrlCMdYmILPEOBaPrXoSaIHq3ViCnYWpQ5nm5XEeTpy 8XlDY25LK6/VrlEgF2rAZCY4wQnS4M/X/p8F14k72wmfwF5zwbly2pL/haXNqld3gT+G 4K6d8EYeiPX5C8G+vaMLn9zd9J37VfkYhv0uDrrx0FgSxMERmSIBEy1Ytc09y/3Cgnxb jNww== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxyo7C0ysBAZq92sMmqE3hbXqfpXkMetr8pPL4+oENPvFQUJeiy 2h5T7yy0ruLP1a3xeFr2J7kEcLmbe8FchTWdpoL5PL2BoZNFedCFn4NP2OWfiBK6MLRM7w2MsRo FC+P56Z0dKjRxlt3N7fVoT2152/4El+I3 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFh+gqRYGf7KSpa7wi0ufzLc8a1V+TS7pignT/7ROAJ382NWg/p7LG41AfvsIpezDVUj3pVuU7yrxPtHOjrlSo= X-Received: by 2002:ac5:c199:0:b0:4df:7ba8:5c73 with SMTP id 71dfb90a1353d-4eb02f0a581mr7279446e0c.14.1717433510011; Mon, 03 Jun 2024 09:51:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86h6eakmpn.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:286471 Archived-At: > > > > > Bug#71343 seems to describe a GUI frame (if not, what does the > > > window-manager have to do with it?). While here we are talking about > > > TTY frames, right? And killing frames is not involved in this bug > > > report, right? Or what am I missing? > > > > This one (bug 71289) seems to be about crashes involving GC messages > > and resizing the terminal. > > AFAIR, almost all of the bugs you submitted have something to do with > GC messages, so the above doesn't help in any way to make this one > stand out, or am I confused? Bug 71343 has nothing to do with GC. This one (bug 71289) does. I don't know what you mean by stand out; it doesn't need to stand out. But each bug is different, e.g.: - 71176 was a bug about GC messages not working well when opening+closing frames, in some conditions - this one (71289) is about GC messages not working well when resizing the terminal, in some conditions > > In all reports I'm using TTY frames, i.e. Emacs compiled without X > > support; it's not GUI frames. But I'm running them inside a urxvt > > window in X with a window manager. I wanted a simpler and smaller > > Emacs without any X support, but I still run it in X. > > So how is the window manager relevant here? Here (bug 71289) you need a window manager to resize the window (the X window that is running emacsclient). The particular window manager you use isn't important, in fact I saw the same errors happen in wmii and icewm. Saying this is important, because I was afraid that the problems could come from wmii (wmii failing to communicate that an X window has been resized). But the window manager isn't at fault in this bug 71289.