From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Matt McClure Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Make fci-mode coexist better with line-move-visual Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 17:34:29 -0400 Message-ID: References: <8338rj5ww4.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b111c9993b02c04e1574612 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1373664874 22653 80.91.229.3 (12 Jul 2013 21:34:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 21:34:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 12 23:34:37 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Uxkz7-0000N8-61 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 23:34:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52291 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uxkz6-0008B6-Pv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 17:34:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60176) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uxkz3-0008At-GK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 17:34:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uxkz2-00013F-ID for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 17:34:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pd0-x22f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22f]:48722) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uxkz0-00012G-E4; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 17:34:30 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pd0-f175.google.com with SMTP id 4so8965147pdd.6 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:34:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=K71AaB2IrcmypnOzq+tB2wn0H3t4E+/qN8wodJgCb50=; b=g3bU75XjwkaAhl31/RUeh4DJXBWUaQN1pa8rUgZHhG1JaZCo0z9EnT2jFBiy2nlg9t c07cQFWaZM5TOs5L8smWn/m5H72TlNEr9PdXMMYqWo5AqvHXf3hde7fZb0vyST9Fukm6 Ew00Zow9KKBK+w1BDRIVD9qZqnq+lar97fLC2HzQBH8aCYGihOn+xE1G0NgjYqaWpaaF rhKN1INYmnu2kvjw38M4iPG8hpNWY5PGag9J2vpKZTNhOlbG5OCZfm8gf5/xUUwwNbYL 6gS6ui9SZEbqnTg/xF1dFW+QLAs0dloTyroxFsFYu2zdJOTC/C4UByfh1LZtSbrLybSv kROw== X-Received: by 10.68.115.131 with SMTP id jo3mr43945374pbb.133.1373664869329; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:34:29 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.69.0.35 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:34:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8338rj5ww4.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22f X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:161843 Archived-At: --047d7b111c9993b02c04e1574612 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I think it's posn-at-point. Look at what it returns at the leftmost > position of the 2nd line, and you will see why next-line moves to > column 2. > Interesting. In the leftmost position on line 2, in both scenarios in my original message, posn-at-point returns: (# 2 (497 . 15) 0 nil 2 (3 . 1) nil (0 . 0) (7 . 15)) I think you're saying the (COL . ROW) value (3 . 1) should be (0 . 2). Right? -- Matt McClure http://matthewlmcclure.com http://www.mapmyfitness.com/profile/matthewlmcclure --047d7b111c9993b02c04e1574612 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wro= te:
I think it's posn-at-point. =A0Look at what it returns at the leftmost<= br> position of the 2nd line, and you will see why next-line moves to
column 2.

Interesting. In the leftmost position on line 2, in = both scenarios in my original message, posn-at-point returns:

=A0 =A0 (#<window 0x106810050 on *scratch*> 2 (497 . 15) 0 nil = 2 (3 . 1) nil (0 . 0) (7 . 15))

I think you're saying the (COL . ROW) value (3 . 1)= should be (0 . 2). Right?

--047d7b111c9993b02c04e1574612--