From: John Kitchin <jkitchin@andrew.cmu.edu>
To: "briangpowell ." <briangpowellms@gmail.com>
Cc: org-mode-email <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: emacs build command for org-files
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2020 15:05:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJ51ETquZ3jLJViVaJG-wfL=DgAKBA8PHtFXQ3Kt0EuUmafD=A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFm0skHvRfs2QCUZsu-2ctQZY_PrU_3uKhv=YmQBE74uzaBFpw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6129 bytes --]
On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 2:39 PM briangpowell . <briangpowellms@gmail.com>
wrote:
> "don't want it to necessarily use Makefiles"
>
> Why the hey not Dr. Kitchin!?
>
1. I like all the build code in one file that also contains the document I
am building. I know I could put a makefile in a src block and tangle it
before running it, but make is not meeting my needs for this.
2. all the build code is mostly written in elisp
3. my emacs startup is slow and I don't use emacsclient so sequential build
commands that launch emacs with shell arguments are too slow compared to
the build sequences in src blocks.
>
> Make is an extremely powerful language
>
It is not as easy or readable for me to use as elisp, and probably not as
powerful. I don't like powerful programming in shell (or make) languages, I
prefer to do that in something like elisp or python where I my skills are
more developed and I have better tools for debugging.
>
> Problem is people make makefiles that are often hard for others to
> read--suggest you try hard to keep it simple & avoid the fancy ways of
> doing things
>
Sometimes you have fancy needs that require fancy ways of doing things.
>
> Make has flow control & is a very rich language
>
I don't really need flow control for this need.
> I use makefiles for every project Then Ccc to compile and/or run
> everything--in Emacs--can't get easier and faster than that--as long as you
> make the makefiles so easy that anyone can read & understand exactly what
> it does
>
When they are this easy, it is nearly equivalent to simply publishing the
org file to the target, so I am C-c C-e lo away from what I want.
>
> This is my default, which I may edit on-the-fly and just put in another
> project name:
>
> make --ignore-errors --jobs=555 -w --keep-going --warn-undefined-variables
> --environment-overrides -f ~/n/n/etc/1cv2tex2doc-project_mak.makefile
> 1cv2tex2doc-project-exe
>
This is exactly the kind of command I might put in a build source block. I
suppose you might save that as a file local variable so you can just M-x
compile away though.
>
> All slightly interesting ways to improve make have failed slightly, in one
> way or another--they catch on for a few years until they're mostly
> abandoned--for very good reasons
>
> Look at it this way: Is there anything wrong with make? Where does it
> fail?
>
Make is perfectly fine for sequences of shell commands that operate on
files. With straight latex projects, make would be my goto. With my org
files though, it is not a straight export to latex and carry on approach I
use. So, I am looking for something that is more aligned with sequences of
elisp commands on a buffer, and not in an asynchronous way. These command
sequences are usually customized on a per document basis, otherwise I would
already have wrapped them up into general export commands.
>
> Everyone should learn & use make
>
I know how to use make, and I don't like it for this purpose. The src
blocks serve my needs just fine, I am just looking for an easier way to
call them in large documents.
>
> --Brian G. Powell, M.S.--that guy that still loves Makefiles and still
> loves using asterisks ("***") as bullets in OrgMode
>
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 1:11 PM John Kitchin <jkitchin@andrew.cmu.edu>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> This is only semi-on-topic. I am looking for something like M-x compile
>> for my org-files, but I don't want it to necessarily use Makefiles. I am
>> looking for suggestions of existing solutions to this, or thoughts on how
>> to implement this.
>>
>> Actually, if it was possible to get M-x compile to run an elisp function
>> instead of a make file, it might be all I need, but it looks like it runs
>> shell commands.
>>
>> For most of my files, simple exporting is totally adequate. But, some
>> files are more complicated, and what I usually do in these cases is write
>> an elisp code block in a section that is tagged :noexport: and then I run
>> that block to build the result. A recent example was a proposal where I
>> needed a pdf of the body, and separate pdf of the references.
>>
>> I have separate elisp functions that generate these, and then I added
>> some custom cleanup code in the block to delete some intermediate
>> directories. I don't want to put these in a makefile because they are
>> specific to this document. While this works, in a large document I find it
>> a little inconvenient to make a small change say at the top, and then to
>> jump to the bottom to run the build block to see how it changed. What I
>> would prefer is to just run a command like M-x org-compile that would know
>> about this build block and run it. That block could of course be a shell
>> block that runs a makefile, but it would most often be an elisp block. I
>> could even imagine that there is a makefile block that is tangled before
>> running a shell block that runs a make command.
>>
>> What I do in a function now is something like this in a save-excursion:
>>
>> (when (not (stringp (org-babel-goto-named-src-block "build")))
>> (org-babel-execute-src-block))
>>
>> I don't use this in these projects, but they highlight some of the
>> complexities I am trying to simplify. These are book like projects with
>> special formatting needs, and multiple outputs.
>>
>> In this project (
>> https://github.com/jkitchin/pycse/blob/master/pycse.org#L15096), I have
>> multiple output targets that I would run.
>>
>> In this project (
>> https://github.com/jkitchin/dft-book/blob/master/dft.org#build) I use
>> some temporary filters to save the src blocks to files, and to embed them
>> in the pdf so they can be opened.
>>
>> Anyway, it feels like I am reinventing something here, and that there
>> might be some better approach already out there. Maybe some elisp
>> equivalent of a makefile or something?
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> John
>>
>> -----------------------------------
>> Professor John Kitchin
>> Doherty Hall A207F
>> Department of Chemical Engineering
>> Carnegie Mellon University
>> Pittsburgh, PA 15213
>> 412-268-7803
>> @johnkitchin
>> http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu
>>
>>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 9111 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-26 20:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-26 18:10 emacs build command for org-files John Kitchin
2020-01-26 19:38 ` briangpowell .
2020-01-26 20:05 ` John Kitchin [this message]
2020-01-26 21:13 ` briangpowell .
2020-01-27 15:53 ` John Kitchin
2020-01-27 17:38 ` Jack Kamm
2020-01-27 19:13 ` John Kitchin
2020-01-27 8:16 ` Stefan Nobis
2020-01-27 13:33 ` John Kitchin
2020-01-27 12:40 ` Neil Jerram
2020-01-27 13:16 ` John Kitchin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJ51ETquZ3jLJViVaJG-wfL=DgAKBA8PHtFXQ3Kt0EuUmafD=A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jkitchin@andrew.cmu.edu \
--cc=briangpowellms@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.