From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Aaron Jensen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23928: 25.0.95; Performance regression observable with smartparens Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 02:48:16 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83wpkug2zs.fsf@gnu.org> <83h9bxftx4.fsf@gnu.org> <83y459eah8.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3b1e7q2.fsf@gnu.org> <558772bd-cab7-3358-a7f0-4071d338f0f9@yandex.ru> <83furhe2ra.fsf@gnu.org> <83d1mle1vm.fsf@gnu.org> <6055e15a-5939-bfa9-a975-2482c74cb58d@yandex.ru> <83bn24ewn4.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c05f87eb14a2e0537532f3a X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1468205365 14799 80.91.229.3 (11 Jul 2016 02:49:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 02:49:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net, 23928@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 11 04:49:16 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bMRHX-00011k-Um for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 04:49:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57567 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMRHU-0004Hy-4r for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 22:49:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40731) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMRHO-0004Hr-97 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 22:49:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMRHK-0006z0-1s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 22:49:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:33466) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMRHJ-0006yk-Uy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 22:49:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bMRHJ-0004Yp-Qa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 22:49:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Aaron Jensen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 02:49:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23928 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 23928-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23928.146820531217488 (code B ref 23928); Mon, 11 Jul 2016 02:49:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23928) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jul 2016 02:48:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45803 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bMRGq-0004Y0-7Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 22:48:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-it0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:35923) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bMRGp-0004Xm-2A for 23928@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 22:48:31 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-it0-f41.google.com with SMTP id f6so43835840ith.1 for <23928@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 19:48:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qdjaZU6jG3IlV3xildTEe9vU6LOgq/M4xQltdsnRtS0=; b=ZwfQSqXcWLLcSuyee8RFD4VM5SWPc6+zc24BM9HyH0ekSZAqWdYfd5DR+lKLvSVktZ dSI3rKehNWfOd5kLMu3qYosl81RzpuqPvBqnej8lfTSeZxHboBltP/AOzTmX3bs1jK0+ 8/0rg9EntNAEhHXQymqFFOGHSfzp9dBwcYLTpSxa0vwcwFHstBUKQM3M2hBv2jterhz6 Y594Hnrt/DQADfqiWurkeBONq4Y2ZAtKPTQ2dTfsA44EkpVpRcEQHUM2DvLfBEj4iE8M V0K70/YxFVhfWqFS1kzRv5/5xZKyTYkiQg6GDj+BRQG09UY9PyYMRGdcDx1CKY9iJLqH lI6A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qdjaZU6jG3IlV3xildTEe9vU6LOgq/M4xQltdsnRtS0=; b=evty4TC6+SCHbCMAKqyUNAdwxfUyqJeWSYIhQZEqeAn6lEMPLj2hA7KE4ROlo9L7Dn BdVjCfyjZ9VLWqLScylYHjJZov+cZWErUdWaJQV1qr13FNccZAG5D2wzLcMy4ErV1eSt hBmBgCz3o0o1bzCpBJZ+B7Tu7DGc2rglq4bqRudmJzZwznZaNqsOA6/DuO5lPMM+oNNt c8hXglXgAa1H6cDiKAr4QjV9EylgiRizbHuyPUluQ4/cAGZPKZQvOG3oFfrHXmUblc1J rEwIBqIgo+M+UCTOA00PXUw974HkJB29eJylJpluYXCEa+A3M6nkQYOxdt9hmAGxpSra khrw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIwhsGx3yB4AWbWkJEB2yMkWM3WooonDeu6Ke4aHOjLJI0xUwEiaevb97/wLh3kEaOxkXYz12OBDrqg1w== X-Received: by 10.36.158.197 with SMTP id p188mr7731301itd.97.1468205305512; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 19:48:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83bn24ewn4.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:120826 Archived-At: --94eb2c05f87eb14a2e0537532f3a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 7:28 PM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > I see. Then I think we should figure out why it's become more expensive > > in Emacs 25 (if that is indeed the case). > > It isn't yet clear that this is what happened. Can someone time this > in both versions compiled with the same optimization options? > I=E2=80=99m not thinking that this is the case anymore=E2=80=A6 at least, I= don=E2=80=99t have any evidence to point to that. I still don=E2=80=99t know exactly what state em= acs has to be in for it to be super painfully slow. The fix/workaround, while it helped, only really shaved off 4ms or so from a typometer avg, which is significant, but it wasn=E2=80=99t as bad as I had seen it in the slow case= , so I=E2=80=99m probably missing something in the repro. Any way, I=E2=80=99m happy to consider this bug closed if you all are, thou= gh I think that adding additional caveats to the docs would be wonderful, this is a particularly nasty/surprising thing. Thank you all for your help. --=20 Aaron --94eb2c05f87eb14a2e0537532f3a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Sun= , Jul 10, 2016 at 7:28 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> I see. Then I think we should figure out why it's become more expe= nsive
> in Emacs 25 (if that is indeed the case).

It isn't yet clear that this is what happened.=C2=A0 Can someone time t= his
in both versions compiled with the same optimization options?

I=E2=80=99m not thinking that this is the case anymo= re=E2=80=A6 at least, I don=E2=80=99t have any evidence to point to that. I= still don=E2=80=99t know exactly what state emacs has to be in for it to b= e super painfully slow. The fix/workaround, while it helped, only really sh= aved off 4ms or so from a typometer avg, which is significant, but it wasn= =E2=80=99t as bad as I had seen it in the slow case, so I=E2=80=99m probabl= y missing something in the repro.

Any way, I=E2=80= =99m happy to consider this bug closed if you all are, though I think that = adding additional caveats to the docs would be wonderful, this is a particu= larly nasty/surprising thing.

Thank you all for yo= ur help.
--
Aaron
--94eb2c05f87eb14a2e0537532f3a--