From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Aaron Jensen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#31546: 27.0.50; macOS child frames with no mode-line mouse click problem Date: Sat, 26 May 2018 13:15:26 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20180523213124.GC36578@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <5B06679A.2020407@gmx.at> <83o9h5ax8n.fsf@gnu.org> <20180526163844.GA16324@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <20180526182215.GA18042@breton.holly.idiocy.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1527365647 26812 195.159.176.226 (26 May 2018 20:14:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 May 2018 20:14:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 31546@debbugs.gnu.org To: Alan Third Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 26 22:14:02 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fMfZi-0006ss-Bt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 May 2018 22:14:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50031 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fMfbp-0006qi-96 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 May 2018 16:16:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44135) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fMfbj-0006qd-A6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 May 2018 16:16:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fMfbe-0003bc-83 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 May 2018 16:16:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42033) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fMfbe-0003bU-3c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 May 2018 16:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fMfbd-0003Y9-Tw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 May 2018 16:16:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Aaron Jensen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 26 May 2018 20:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31546 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 31546-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31546.152736574413620 (code B ref 31546); Sat, 26 May 2018 20:16:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 31546) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 May 2018 20:15:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49930 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fMfbM-0003Xc-GG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 May 2018 16:15:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qt0-f180.google.com ([209.85.216.180]:39726) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fMfbK-0003XP-Su for 31546@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 May 2018 16:15:43 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qt0-f180.google.com with SMTP id f1-v6so10683953qtj.6 for <31546@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 26 May 2018 13:15:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VBiRhI5bPe/ojT8++aUt2chQoq27ymCcrq31pzYgFP4=; b=PygBMsFaij89qEPNyQzuWy2+Z11MEdayyGra8pU99WQriIIbq9NdCh18MAgjJNsIhQ zVz6sL6cNke9R4uqDqp5sL7iJss2F/7uJfz2aJi/qdR5+h1Yv9HxYBgw7qtrmKNPOk9q U5iOlhn8yqZoLUia7x9QfauXN4w2tkjEsQT70eg968xV8CfixGe3U4qV4BDlvDi9JXJn ilxaJcxpLHouLqIjx5zbQL3yg4Jd9+DXtSpsV6FRxl7GCZOTyr6k4gCDfp0+XfV8rMsc P/q70BLJi+UpDTp2sUXSgs4/FaLztxGMBk+X9ywUamAEVEpPJpPvA4tRjEqK2NG6rzFf rwNw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VBiRhI5bPe/ojT8++aUt2chQoq27ymCcrq31pzYgFP4=; b=Aq9DQjwvxOJhIaq+8jS3bnS/PbO2HgxNH+Rd5dkHqMdk53l0JIvYhdGGNMIJsD2cJ4 JWuqMQO2aXMuMSK4VkLuMQ/r/uvri1SIn/rl15JZaJUG7ZnJSfLXSt8Cjz+DjXWskkxa 1ohCJSRuixO2EZQGDmPGETvD7v8MTtONP49+lnnWqK8yhYwJp1tp+Qa8Rv2TWFHcVB4U /XOzsrwZXE8qRYbHM8w9OVI0SCj3Cln8gqikGWTDQDALgd3Ahd22Z+Jj3aYx9Rt94qdb Yl72dQnXtqAKmD+nfdBcTlmi2cW+RXgKiSUaHxvR0iTse1CQk0QKMz7v09hcaCs1riKF bZdg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwe0SnnGXFU8WlSxEqicHFIczy9N/ubgqdBV0uamGsSBYQCV2xcz wJXueYCstJ3H0gPY/6funwLiut2Kr4mPz+2BmkA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKKHwqpKI4NigL3WO/vdXk4BHAbvv+MaK89b2z8llf0URZH/je+M+WV3HW+FaHK5zGG6rjfRucBJPknQkstv3tU= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:ac8:: with SMTP id g8-v6mr7104231qti.127.1527365737380; Sat, 26 May 2018 13:15:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20180526182215.GA18042@breton.holly.idiocy.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:146578 Archived-At: On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 11:22 AM Alan Third wrote: > Ah yeah. I must have been getting confused. I just seem to be adding > confusion to this thread. Sorry for the noise. No problem, this is a confusing issue. I appreciate you looking into this and reproducing it. > I=E2=80=99d have thought so, but it works in every other situation withou= t the > patch so I can=E2=80=99t help thinking the patch must change the behaviou= r > where it previously worked. On X, if you C-h k and then click in that area (when the new frame does not overlap the original frame), does it register a mouse-drag-region and mouse-set-point? I'm also confused as to why it is harder to repro when the new frame is overlapping the original frame. If they're not overlapping, it repros every time. Another hint: If I repro it, then scroll with the mousewheel down to restore it to the original scroll position and click again w/o moving the mouse, then click again, it does not repro. If I move my mouse before clicking it repros again. A question: Should frames with no-accept-focus still accept mouse events? I imagine the answer is yes, but just want to check in case that's the thing that is different between X and NS