From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Simen =?UTF-8?Q?Endsj=C3=B8?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#70914: 29.3; Crashes often on Windows Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 08:42:42 +0200 Message-ID: References: <86msouxamh.fsf@gnu.org> <86h6f0wsbv.fsf@gnu.org> <86seyjtgvd.fsf@gnu.org> <86ttizjdwm.fsf@gnu.org> <86h6eykiuk.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36251"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 70914@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu May 16 08:45:26 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1s7Urm-0009CQ-7P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 16 May 2024 08:45:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s7UrP-0001h2-Cy; Thu, 16 May 2024 02:45:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s7UrN-0001ea-1X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2024 02:45:01 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s7UrM-0003h0-D6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2024 02:45:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s7UrO-0006qG-Ek for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2024 02:45:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Simen =?UTF-8?Q?Endsj=C3=B8?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 06:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 70914 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 70914-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B70914.171584184626264 (code B ref 70914); Thu, 16 May 2024 06:45:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 70914) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 May 2024 06:44:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46937 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s7UqT-0006pY-O6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2024 02:44:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lf1-f54.google.com ([209.85.167.54]:55491) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s7UqR-0006p4-9j for 70914@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2024 02:44:04 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-f54.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-51f60817e34so484343e87.2 for <70914@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 15 May 2024 23:44:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1715841775; x=1716446575; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=11+SbIEHLRtP/wJBBlAfy0sJqYfWpRh97kvRRZxgXvs=; b=auoKHy7c8wIYX59pG1j6qI2C8185NedSO3QTTMyyDCzEmXzuXo09tHsMWZ2ntJ0Ffh 8pWPtz5biVRbTPQKUYTxROypKFKisOGZfvLZKzwkatcPbvuTKIvM7mk3wpEcsIbK7bjQ tM4mZKIUBtN3f7s8zJsSM+GdkTCUDNhawUyl5XZF5rGc0w613vlT0WO4kIAmxjNTh9q3 eQ76OH4AlmK1sK+xywBAYjEL0b2o8x6/Tnro7yBt0m703bwyqnEa//O16+01ypsscCKt FF7M0mIeAjKWMJjGpJF9uOeuoe1Ws9hPVhGzUdupcx15bIXhcCvjPHK47vaervFJ3dUW HvYQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1715841775; x=1716446575; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=11+SbIEHLRtP/wJBBlAfy0sJqYfWpRh97kvRRZxgXvs=; b=o/jYqFSx/ObtHELxG8F0ckn1o8pVuUoE3br+5qkrqZR3+wrriUgVHmfLATyr/YSlZ5 qqcAsb4R/fLT4KR+0pW5Z7iPDWNaNTEQFkADkFRcNYhxTc3+G1gMKi8OfGLs+utVJn1V cisTwiNvBId0VXskSe4yVks1NGbw1/1BJ/NyLyx0abgIMycH78eZDnh5rm6plXWrLlOf WxfeYL+A3s+g3/1emJgV0kdQucEjjjs21yW9+bkUolGICyU4ZcvLNG3uN01vngc6ASBg OhhaOPcPDJAmOsy0hlaoErb5buPi4aBEDBSKNNUSYsZQUQ0/4RRlhVDwge9jnEmNQBCN vmng== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxQT+oCYEV/dMbCOvaOtfzF9sKMOz2wUVzuVH/3e0MSHRaEk4+a jIHiq1gGitFWIJ4IQQcgDlEoEvccTWuRR4/58najHa9k6dZ5LC9J5wWaffUxpjI/ZPSSwbuxhH+ qlMOWPcqA28SySkeKWNZBaAmWmoE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHksXphl4Vaq3JzqCG/h6n1eq57vZO5dU0OLUl2ByehdJKS3EE9ZqEZH/rMS5EbbJGU5rpjy8xpByPy/A1/OnI= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:51b3:0:b0:523:ac80:e660 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-523ac80e702mr1265213e87.38.1715841774961; Wed, 15 May 2024 23:42:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86h6eykiuk.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:285130 Archived-At: > Did you say you see these problems on other machines as well? If not, > I'd suspect something basic, like hardware problem. I don't have problems with other software, so it doesn't seem like a hardwa= re problem. I did a full hardware scan during the night, and it didn't uncover any problems. On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 8:53=E2=80=AFPM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > From: Simen Endsj=C3=B8 > > Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 20:21:36 +0200 > > Cc: 70914@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > (process:13240): GLib-GIO-WARNING **: 20:15:06.678: Unexpectedly, > > UWP app `Microsoft.OutlookForWindows_1.2023.1101.300_x64__8wekyb3d8bbwe= ' > > (AUMId `Microsoft.OutlookForWindows_8wekyb3d8bbwe!Microsoft.OutlookforW= indows') > > supports 1 extensions but has no verbs > > What are these warnings from Glib, and why should Emacs care about > problems with Outlook? > > > gdb: Target exception EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION at 0x0 > > > > Thread 1 received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > > 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () > > That exception says that Emacs somehow tried to execute code at > address zero, which is invalid. It fits the fact that the stack shows > zero address. > > But how did that zero address end up there in the first place? > > IME, Defender is not a problem, but FTR I have excluded the eln-cache > and the directories where the preloaded *.eln files live from > Defender's scans (for speed, mostly -- I don't think I had any false > alarms for those files). > > Did you say you see these problems on other machines as well? If not, > I'd suspect something basic, like hardware problem. I again suggest > to review all the software installed there, maybe something will stand > out. > > And I note that when it crashes, there's always at least one reader > thread which waits for output from a subprocess.